Grape skin is a wine by-product with a high fiber and phenolic compound content, with potential application as an ingredient in food products. This work aimed to study the hedonic and sensory perception of the consumer using the Check-all-that-apply about cereal bars made with grape skin flour (GSF) obtained from wine residue. Grape skin flour with different granulometric ranges (coarse and fine) was added to the cereal bars in different proportions (10, 15, and 20%) to replace the oat flakes present in the formulation. Sensory acceptance results showed that all bars had good acceptance scores (>6.42) and presented different sensory profiles. The cereal bar containing 15% of coarse GSF had good sensory acceptance with attributes “few dark spots,” “light color,” and “softer,” with desirable sensory characteristics and from the nutritional point of view with high fiber content and bioactive compounds and it was considered the best formulation. Therefore, the incorporation of wine by-products in cereal bars showed excellent acceptability and the possibility of insertion in the market.
AbeLTDa MotaRVLajoloFM, et al. (2007) Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Vitis labrusca and Vitis vinifera cultivars. Food Science and Technology27(2): 394–400.
2.
ANVISA (2000) National Health Surveillance Agency. Resolution RDC n° 53, of June 15, 2000. Technical Regulation for Fixing the Identity and Quality of Mixture Based on Cereal Bran. Available at: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2000/rdc0053_15_06_ 2000.html (accessed 20 September 2022).
AOAC (2010) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 18th ed. Washington, D C.
6.
AOCS (2005) Official Methods and Recommended Practices, 5th ed. Urbana, USA: American Oil Chemists Society.
7.
AresGBarreiroCDelizaR, et al. (2010) Application of a check-all-that-apply question to the development of chocolate milk desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies25(1): 67–86.
8.
BenderABBDe Mello LuvielmoM, et al. (2016) Obtaining and characterizing grape skin flour and its use in extruded snacks. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology19(2): 10–19.
9.
BeresCFreitasSPGodoyRLO, et al. (2019) Antioxidant dietary fibre from grape pomace flour or extract: Does it make any difference on the nutritional and functional value?Journal of Functional Foods56: 276–285.
10.
BeresCSimas-TosinFFCabezudoI, et al. (2016) Antioxidant dietary fibre recovery from Brazilian pinot noir grape pomace. Food Chemistry201: 145–152.
11.
CaldasTWMazzaKELTelesASC, et al. (2018) Phenolic compounds recovery from grape skin using conventional and nonconventional extraction methods. Industrial Crops & Products111: 86–91.
12.
CarvalhoVSConti-SilvaAC (2018) Cereal bars produced with banana peel flour: Evaluation of acceptability and sensory profile. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture98(1): 134–139.
13.
Cascaes TelesASChávezDWHCoelhoMAZ, et al. (2021) Combination of enzyme-assisted extraction and high hydrostatic pressure for phenolic compounds recovery from grape pomace. Journal of Food Engineering288: 110–128.
14.
ChávezDWHAscheriJLRCarvalhoCWP, et al. (2021) Physicochemical properties, characteristics, and consumer acceptance of whole grain Sorghum expanded extrudates. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation45(10): 1–13.
15.
DengQPennerMHZhaoY (2011) Chemical composition of dietary fiber and polyphenols of five different varieties of wine grape pomace skins. Food Research International44(9): 2712–2720.
16.
DifonzoGTroiloMAllegrettaI, et al. (2023) Grape skin and seed flours as functional ingredients of pizza: Potential and drawbacks related to nutritional, physicochemical and sensory attributes. LWT - Food Science and Technology175: 114494.
17.
DutcoskySD (2007) Análise sensorial de alimentos. Curitiba: Pucpress.
18.
European Union (2006) Commission regulation (EC) n° 1924/2006 of nutrition and health claims made on food. Journal of the European UnionL404: 9–25.
19.
GeorgéSBratPAlterP, et al. (2005) Rapid determination of polyphenols and vitamin C in plant-derived products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry53(5): 1370–1373.
20.
GondimJAMMouraMFVDantasAS, et al. (2005) Composição centesimal e de minerais em cascas de frutas. Food Science and Technology25(4): 825–827.
21.
Institute of Medicine (2022) Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI). Available at: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/ (accessed 20 September 2022).
22.
KalliELappaIBouchagierP, et al. (2018) Novel application and industrial exploitation of winery by-products. Bioresources and Bioprocessing5: 46.
23.
KimDOJeongSWLeeCY (2003) Antioxidant capacity of phenolic phytochemicals from various cultivars of plums. Food Chemistry81: 231–326.
24.
KimEHJCorriganVKHedderleyDI, et al. (2009) Predicting the sensory texture of cereal snack bars using instrumental measurements. Journal of Texture Studies40: 457–481.
25.
KornackiJLJohnsonJL (2001) Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, and Escherichia coli as quality and safety indicators. In: DowensFPItoK (eds) Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. Washington: American Public Health Association 4, 69–82.
26.
KuchtováVKohajdováZKarovičováJ, et al. (2018) Physical, textural and sensory properties of cookies incorporated with grape skin and seed preparations. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences68(4): 309–317.
27.
KyILorrainBKolbasN, et al. (2014) Wine by-products: Phenolic characterization and antioxidant activity evaluation of grapes and grape pomaces from six different French grape varieties. Molecules19(1): 482–506.
28.
LiuJTetensIBredieWLP (2022) Consumer perception and sensory properties of bakery products fortified with chicken protein for older adults. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science27: 100484.
29.
MacfieHJBratchellNGreenhoffK, et al. (1989) Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in Hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies4(2): 129–148.
30.
MalacridaCRDa MottaS (2005) Total phenolic compounds and anthocyanins in grape juice. Food Science and Technology25(4): 659–664.
31.
MarquesTRCorrêaADAlvesAPC, et al. (2015) Cereal bars enriched with antioxidant substances and rich in fiber, prepared with flours of acerola residues. Journal of Food Science and Technology52(8): 5084–5092.
32.
MattosMCNogueiraLC (2021) Elaboração de uma barra de cereal isenta de glúten, com alto valor nutricional e propriedades funcionais. Alimentos: Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente1(7): 143–170.
OliveiraMDuarteE (2016) Integrated approach to winery waste: Waste generation and data consolidation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering10(1): 168–176.
35.
PereiraRNCoelhoMIGenishevaZ, et al. (2020) Using ohmic heating effect on grape skins as a pretreatment for anthocyanins extraction. Food and Bioproducts Processing124: 320–328.
36.
R Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org (accessed 12 August 2016).
37.
ReRPellegriniNProteggenteA, et al. (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine26(9): 1231–1237.
38.
RodriguesCS (2013) Development of cereal bars with prebiotic and probiotic ingredients. MSc dissertation, State University of Campinas, BR.
39.
RufinoMDSAlvesREBritoDSE, et al. (2007) Scientific methodology: Determination of total antioxidant activity in fruits for the capture of radical livre ABTS +. Technical Communication Embrapa128: 0–3.
40.
Ruíz-GarcíaYBeresCChávezDWH, et al. (2019) Influence of processing conditions on bioactive compound extraction from Vitis vinifera L. Var. Alicante bouschet grape skin. Journal of Food Science and Technology56(2): 1066–1072.
41.
SaadSMI (2006) Probiotics and prebiotics: The state of the art. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences42(1): 1–16.
42.
SilvaIQOliveiraBCFLopesAS, et al. (2009) Obtenção de barra de cereais adicionada do resíduo industrial de maracujá. Alimentos e Nutrição20(2): 321–329.
43.
SudhaMLRamasarmaPRVenkateswara RaoG (2011) Wheat bran stabilization and its use in the preparation of high-fiber pasta. Food Science and Technology International17(1): 47–53.
44.
TsengAZhaoY (2012) Effect of different drying methods and storage time on the retention of bioactive compounds and antibacterial activity of wine grape pomace (Pinot Noir and Merlot). Journal of Food Science77(9): 192–201.
45.
United Nations (2016) The sustainable development goals report 2016. United Nations Publications, Org. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/ (accessed 12 August 2016).
46.
VarelaPAresG (2012) Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International48(2): 893–908.
47.
VedanaMISZiemerCGomesMO, et al. (2008) Effect of processing on the antioxidant activity of grapes. Alimentos e Nutrição Araraquara19(2): 159–165.
48.
VossGBCamposDAPintadoMM, et al. (2021) Cereal bars added with probiotics and prebiotics. In: CruzAGSenaka RanadheeraCNazzaroF (eds) Probiotics and Prebiotics in Foods: Challenges, Innovations, and Advances. 1 Ed., London, United Kingdom: Elsevier, pp. 201–217.
49.
WanyoPChomnawangCSiriamornpunS (2009) Substitution of wheat flour with rice flour and rice bran in flake products: Effects on chemical, physical and antioxidant properties. World Applied Sciences Journal7(1): 49–56.
50.
WHO (2011) Food Contaminant Metals: Aluminum. Geneva.: World Health Organization.
51.
XiaEQDengGFGuoYJ, et al. (2010) Biological activities of polyphenols from grapes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences11(2): 622–646.
52.
YuLPerretJDavyB, et al. (2002) Antioxidant properties of cereal products. Journal of Food Science67(7): 2600–2603.
53.
ZhuFMDuBLiJ (2014) Effect of ultrafine grinding on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of dietary fiber from wine grape pomace. Food Science and Technology International20(1): 55–62.
54.
ZuluetaAEsteveMJFrígolaA (2009) ORAC and TEAC assays comparison to measure the antioxidant capacity of food products. Food Chemistry114(1): 310–316.
