Prato cheese is one of the most consumed dairy products around the word, mainly in Brazil, being the second most produced cheese in the country. However, a great variation in the cheeses sensory profiles is observed. Therefore, knowledge about the attributes that drives the product acceptance is important for Prato cheese standardization, targeting the best production conditions for obtaining cheese quality improvement. Moreover, this study also contributes with information about the TDS and CATA methodologies for the sensory field. TDS and CATA were useful tools determining liking directors of Brazilian Prato cheese. Creamy, Salt and soft attributes were indicated as drivers of liking of Prato cheese, while hard, rubbery and bitter taste contributed negatively to the acceptance of the product.
AdhikariKHeymannHHuffHE. (2003).
Textural characteristics of low fat, full fat, and smoked cheeses: Sensory and instrumental approaches. Food Quality and Preference14(3): 211–218.
3.
AlbertASalvadorASchlichPFiszmanS. (2012).
Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food Quality and Preference24(1): 111–118.
4.
AresGAlcaireFAntúnezL, Vidal L, Giménez A and Castura JCC. (2017).
Identification of drivers of (dis)liking based on dynamic sensory profiles: Comparison of temporal dominance of sensations and temporal check-all-that-apply. Food Research International92: 79–87.
5.
AresGBarreiroCDelizaRGiménez A and Gambaro A. (2010).
Application of check all that applu questions to the development of chocolate milk desserts. Sensory Studies25: 67–86.
6.
AresGDauberCFernándezCGiménezAVarelaP. (2014).
Penalty analysis based on CATA questions to identify drivers of liking and directions for product reformulation. Food Quality and Preference32: 65–76.
7.
BarrosCMVRibeiroACOViottoWH. (2006).
Impact of low concentration factor ultrafiltration on the composition and yield of reduced fat Prato cheese. Desalination200(1-3): 555–556.
8.
BraghieriaAPiazzollaNCarlucciABragaglio A and Napolitano F. (2016).
Sensory properties, consumer liking and choice determinants of lucanian dry cured sausages. Meat Science111: 122–129.
9.
BrownJAFoegedingEADaubertCRDrake MA and Gumpertz M. (2003).
Relationships among rheological and sensorial properties of young cheeses. Journal of Dairy Science86(10): 3054–3067.
10.
CasturaJCLiM. (2016).
Using TDS dyads and other dominance sequences to characterize products and investigate liking changes. Food Quality and Preference47(A): 109–121.
11.
ChenLOparaUL. (2013).
Texture measurement approaches in fresh and processed foods – A review. Food Research International51(2): 823–835.
12.
CichosckiAJValdugaEValdugaATTornadijoMEFresnoJM. (2002).
Characterization of Prato cheese, a Brazilian semi-hard cow variety: Evolution of physico-chemical parameters and mineral composition during ripening. Food Control13(4–5): 329–336.
13.
Cais‐SokolińskaDKaczyńskiLKBierzuńskaPSkotarczakEDobekE. (2020).
Consumer acceptance in context: Texture, melting, and sensory properties of fried ripened curd cheese. International Journal of Dairy Technology74(1): 225–234.
14.
DeeganKCHeikintaloNRitvanenTPutkonenTRekonenJMcSweeneyPLH, et al. (2013).
Effects of low-pressure homogenisation on the sensory and chemical properties of emmental cheese. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies19: 104–114.
15.
Della LuciaSMMinimVPR. (2006). Grupo de foco. In: MinimVPR (ed.) Análise Sensorial: estudos Com Consumidores.
Vol. 4.
Viçosa:
Editora UFV, pp.85–109.
16.
EsmerinoEAPaixãoJACruzAG, et al. (2015).
Survival analysis: a consumer-friendly method to estimate the optimum sucrose level in probiotic petit Suisse. Journal of Dairy Science98(11): 7544–7551.
17.
EverardCDO’CallaghanDJHowardTVO’DonnellCPSheehanEMDelahuntyCM, et al. (2006).
Relationships between sensory and rheological measurements of texture in maturing commercial cheddar cheese over a range of moisture and pH at the point of manufacture. Journal of Texture Studies37(4): 361–382.
18.
FelicioTLEsmerinoEACruzAG. (2013).
Cheese. What is its contribution to the sodium intake of Brazilians?Appetite66: 84–88.
19.
GalmariniMVVisalliMSchlichP. (2016).
Advances in representation and analysis of mono and multi-intake temporal dominance of sensations data. Food Quality and Preference56: 247–255.
20.
García‐GómezBRomero‐RodríguezÁVázquez‐OdérizLMuñoz‐FerreiroNVázquezM. (2019).
Sensory quality and consumer acceptance of skim yoghurt produced with transglutaminase at pilot plant scale. International Journal of Dairy Technology72: 388–394.
21.
GomesAPCruzAGCadenaRSCeleghiniRMSFariaJAFBoliniHMA, et al. (2011).
Manufacture of low-sodium minas fresh cheese: Effect of the partial replacement of sodium chloride with potassium chloride. Journal of Dairy Science94(6): 2701–2706.
22.
HansenC. (2006). Maturação de queijos. Biotec, Valinhos, mar/abr. n.92, pp.6–10.
23.
ISO 8586 (2012). Sensory Analysis. General Guidelines for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Expert Sensory Assessors.
Geneva:
International Organization for Standardization
24.
ISO 8589 (2007). International Standard 8589.Sensory analysis – General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms.Ref. No.ISO 8589:2007 (E).
Genève:
International Organization for Standardization.
25.
JudacewskiPLosPRLimaLSAlbertiAZielinskiAAFNogueiraA, et al. (2019).
Perceptions of Brazilian consumers regarding white mould surface‐ripened cheese using free word association. International Journal of Dairy Technology72(4): 585–590.
26.
Jalabert-MalbosM-LMishellany-DutourAWodaAPeyronM-A. (2007).
Particle size distribution in the food bolus after mastication of natural foods. Food Quality and Preference18(5): 803–812.
27.
LahneJTrubekABPelchatML. (2014).
Consumer sensory perception of cheese depends on context: A study using comment analysis and linear mixed models. Food Quality and Preference32(C): 184–197.
28.
Lawless HT and Heymann H. (2010). Principles of good practice. In: Lawless HT and Heymann H (eds) Sensory Evaluation of Food -- Principles and Practices.
New York:
Springer, pp.57–77.
29.
LemieuxLPuchadesRSimardRE. (1989).
Simard size-exclusion HPLC separation of bitter and astringent fractions from cheddar cheese made with added lactobacillus strains to accelerate ripening. Journal of Food Science54(5): 1234–1237.
30.
LenfantFLoretCPineauNHartmannCMartinN. (2009).
Perception of food oral breakdown: The concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite53(3): 473–667.
31.
Mendes MO, Morais MF and Rodrigues JF. (2019). A2A2 milk: Brazilian consumers' opinions and effect on sensory characteristics of Petit Suisse and Minas cheeses. LWT -- Food Science and Technology 108: 207--213.
32.
Merheb-DiniCGarciaGACPennaALBGomesEda SilvaR. (2012).
Use of a new milk-clotting protease from thermomucorindicae-seudaticae N31 as coagulant and changes during ripening of Prato cheese. Food Chemistry130(4): 859–865.
33.
Meyners M. (2010). On the design, analysis and interpretation of temporal dominance of sensations data. Proceedings of the 11th European symposium on statistical methods for the food industry (AgroStat), Benevento, Italy, February 23–26, 2010 (pp. 45–53). Afragola (Na): Academy School.
34.
NgMLawlorJBChandraSChayaCHewsonLHortJ. (2012).
Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference25(2): 121–134.
35.
OrdóñezJA. (2005).
Tecnologia de alimentos: alimentos de origem animal. Porto Alegre: Artmed2: 279.
36.
PineauNSchlichPCordelleSMathonnièreCIssanchouSImbertA, et al. (2009).
Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference20(6): 450–455.
37.
Pineau, N., Bouillé, A. G., Lepage, M., Lenfant, F., Schlich, P., Martin, N., & Rytz, A. (2012). Temporal dominance of sensations: What is a good attribute list? Food Quality and Preference 26: 159--116.
38.
PinheiroACMNunesCAVietorisV. (2013).
SensoMaker: A tool for sensorial characterization of food products. Ciência e Agrotecnologia37(3): 199–201.
39.
PlaehnD. (2012).
CATA penalty/reward. Food Quality and Preference24(1): 141–152.
40.
RodriguesJFCondinoJPFPinheiroACMNunesCA. (2016).
Temporal dominance of sensations of chocolate bars with different cocoa contents: Multivariate approaches to assess TDS profiles. Food Quality and Preference47: 91–96.
41.
RodriguesJFSouzaVRLimaRRCruzAGPinheiroACM. (2018).
TDS of cheese: Implications of analyzing texture and taste simultaneously. Food Research International106: 1–10.
42.
RodriguesJFGonçalvesCSPereiraRC. (2014).
Utilization of temporal dominance of sensations and time intensity methodology for development of low-sodium mozzarella cheese using a mixture of salts. Journal of Dairy Science97: 4733–4744.
43.
RosenthalAJ. (1999). Food Texture: Measurement and Perception.
Chapman & Hall Food Science Book. Gaithersburg:
Aspen Publishers.
44.
RuyssenTJanssensMVan GasseBVan LaereDVan der EeckenNDe MeerleerM, et al. (2013).
Characterisation of gouda cheeses based on sensory, analytical and high-field 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy determinations: Effect of adjunct cultures and brine composition on sodium-reduced gouda cheese. International Dairy Journal33(2): 142–152.
45.
Saint-EveAPanouilléMCapitaineCDélérisISouchonI. (2015).
Dynamic aspects of texture perception during cheese consumption and relationship with bolus properties. Food Hydrocolloids46: 144–152.
46.
Sant’anaAMSBezerrilFFMadrugaMS. (2013).
Nutritional and sensory characteristics of minas fresh cheese made with goat milk, cow milk, or a mixture of both. Journal of Dairy Science96: 7442–7453.
47.
SilvaHMLBalthazarCFSilvaR, et al. (2018).
Sodium reduction and flavor enhancer addition in probiotic Prato cheese: Contributions of quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations for sensory profiling. Journal of Dairy Science101: 8837–8846.
48.
SinopoliDALawlessHT. (2012).
Taste properties of potassium chloride alone and in mixtures with sodium chloride using a check‐all‐that‐apply method. Journal of Food Science77: S319–S322.
49.
SmitGSmitBAEngelsWJM. (2005).
Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products. FEMS Microbiology Reviews29(3): 591–610.
50.
SmitGVerheulAvan KranenburgRAyadESiezenREngelsW, et al. (2000).
Cheese flavour development by enzymatic conversions of peptides and amino acids. Food Research International33(3–4): 153–160.
51.
SobralDBueno CostaRGMachadoGMJacinto de PaulaJCMartins TeodoroVANunesNM, et al. (2016).
Can lutein replace annatto in the manufacture of Prato cheese?LWT – Food Science and Technology68: 349–355.
52.
TarancónPFiszmanSMSalvadorATárregaA. (2013).
Formulating biscuits with healthier fats. Consumer profiling of textural and flavour sensations during consumption. Food Research International53(1): 134–140.
53.
TorresFREsmerinoEACarrBT, Ferrão, LL, Granato D and Pimentel TC. (2017).
Rapid consumer-based sensory characterization of requeijão cremoso, a spreadable processed cheese: Performance of new statistical approaches to evaluate check-all-that-apply data. Journal of Dairy Science100: 6100–6110.
54.
VandenbergheEChoucharinaSLucaSDe KetelaereBDe BaerdemaekerJClaesJ, et al. (2014).
Spatio-temporal gradients of dry matter content and fundamental material parameters of gouda cheese. Journal of Food Engineering142: 31–38.
55.
VisserS. (1993).
Proteolytic enzymes and their relation to cheese ripening and flavor: An overview. Journal of Dairy Science76(1): 329–350.
56.
WakelingINMacfieHJH. (1995).
Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from may be tested. Food Quality and Preference6(4): 299–308.
