A study has been carried out in order to determine the effect of the lactic acid bacteria inoculation time on the kinetic of vinification and on chemical and sensory characteristics of Cabernet Franc wines. Traditional vinifications, with lactic acid bacteria inoculated after completion of alcoholic fermentation were compared with vinifications where yeast and bacteria were co-inoculated at the beginning of vinification. One commercial yeast strain and an autochthonous Oenococcus oeni strain (C22L9), previously identified and selected at our laboratory, were used. Monitoring of alcoholic and malolactic fermentations was carried out by yeast and lactic acid bacteria counts and by measuring l-malic acid concentration. Wines were chemically characterized and analysed for volatile compounds content. A sensory analysis, consisting of a descriptive and a triangular test, was also carried out. Results from this study showed that the concurrent yeast/bacteria inoculation of musts at the beginning of vinification produced a reduction in duration of the process without an excessive increase in volatile acidity. Differences in volatile compounds content and the corresponding impact on the sensorial profile of wines were also displayed. These results suggest that co-inoculation is a worthwhile alternative for winemaking of Cabernet Franc wines, if compared with traditional post-alcoholic fermentation lactic acid bacteria inoculation.
AbrahamseCEBartowskyEJ (2012) Timing of MLF in Shiraz grape must and wine: Influence on chemical composition. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology28: 255–265.
2.
AlexandreHCostelloPJRemizeFGuzzoJGuilloux-BenatierM (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae–Oenococcus oeni interaction in wine: current knowledge and perspectives. International Journal of Food Microbiology93: 141–154.
3.
Antalick G. (2010). Bilan biochimique et sensoriel des modifications de la note fruitée des vins rouges lors de la fermentation malolactique: rôle particulier des esters. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences. École Doctorale en Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé (Bordeaux).
4.
AzzoliniMTosiEVagnoliPKriegerSZapparoliG (2010) Evaluation of technological effects of yeast-bacterial co-inoculation in red table wine production. Italian Journal of Food Science3: 257–263.
5.
BauerRDicksLMT (2004) Control of malolactic fermentation in wine. A review. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture25: 74–88.
6.
BoidoEMedinaKFariaLCarrauFVersiniGDellacassaE (2009) The effect of bacterial strain and aging on the secondary volatile metabolites produced during malolactic fermentation of Tannat red wine. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry57: 6271–6278.
7.
D’InceccoNBartowskyEKassaraSLanteASpettoliPHenschkeP (2004) Release of glycosidically bound flavour compounds of Chardonnay by Oenococcus oeni during malolactic fermentation. Food Microbiology21: 257–265.
8.
FerreiraVFernándezPGraciaJPCachoJF (1995) Identification of volatile constituents in wines from Vitis vinifera var. Viradillo and sensory contribution of the different wine flavour fraction. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture69: 229–310.
9.
GerbauxVBriffoxCDumontASibylleK (2009) Influence of inoculation with malolactic bacteria on volatile phenols in wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture60: 233–235.
10.
GilJVMateoJJJiménezMPastorAHuertaT (1996) Aroma compounds in wine as influenced by apiculate yeasts. Journal of Food Science61: 1247–1249.
11.
Hernández-OrtePCersosimoMLoscosNCachoJGarcía-MorunoEFerreiraV (2009) Aroma development frond non-floral grape precursors by wine lactic acid bacteria. Food Research International42: 773–781.
12.
IbarzMFerreiraVHernandez-OrtePLoscosNCachoJ (2006) Optimization and evaluation of a procedure for the gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of the aromas generated by fast acid hydrolysis of flavors precursors extracted from grapes. Journal of Chromatography1116: 217–229.
13.
ISO Standard 11035 (1994) Sensory Analysis. Identification and Selection of Descriptors for Establishing a Sensory Profile, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
14.
ISO Standard 4120 (1983) Sensory Analysis. Methodology for Triangular Test, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
15.
IzquierdoPMGarcíaEGómezSPalopMLl (2008) Changes in the aromatic composition of Tempranillo wines during spontaneous malolactic fermentation. Journal of Food Composition Analysis21: 724–730.
16.
Izquierdo CañasPMPérez MartínFGarcía RomeroESeseña PrietoSPalop HerrerosMLI (2012) Influence of inoculation time of an autochthonous selected malolactic bacterium on volatile and sensory profile of Tempranillo and Merlot wines. International Journal of Food Microbiology156: 245–254.
17.
KriegerSZapparoliGVeneriGTosiEVagnoliP (2007) Comparison between simultaneous and sequential alcoholic and malolactic fermentations for partially dried grapes in the production of Amarone style wine. Australian NZ Grapegrower winemaker517: 71–77.
18.
LermEEngelbrechtLdu ToitM (2010) Malolactic fermentation: The ABC’s of MLF. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture31: 186–212.
19.
Lonvaud-FunelA (1999) Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek76: 317–331.
20.
MasseraASoriaACataniaCKriegerSCombinaM (2009) Simultaneous inoculation of Malbec (Vitis vinifera) musts with yeast and bacteria: Effects on fermentation performance, sensory and sanitary attributes of wines. Food Technology and Biotechnology47: 192–201.
21.
MendozaLMMerínMGMorataVIFaríasME (2011) Characterization of wines produced by mixed culture of autochthonous yeasts and Oenococcus oeni from the northwest region of Argentina. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology38: 1777–1785.
22.
NagelCWGloriesY (1991) Use a modified dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde reagent for analysis of flavanols. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture42: 364–366.
23.
OIV (2011) Compendium of International Methods of Wine and Must Analysis, Edition 2009, Paris: International Organization of Vine and Wine.
24.
Ribéreau-GayonPDubourdieuDDonècheBLonvaud-FunelA (2006) Handbook of Enology: The Microbiology of Wine and Vinifications, 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons.
25.
Ribéreau-GayonJPeynaudESudraudPRibereau-GayonP (1989) Tratado de Enología, Ciencias y Técnicas del Vino, Argentina: Hemisferio Sur.
26.
Ribereau-GayonPStronestreetE (1965) Le dosage des anthocyanes dans les vins rouges. Bulletin Société Chimie9: 2649–2652.
27.
RuizPIzquierdoPMSeseñaSGarcíaEPalopMLl (2012) Malolactic fermentation and secondary metabolite production by Oenococcus oeni strains in low pH wines. Journal of Food Science77: 579–585.
28.
RuizPIzquierdoPMSeseñaSPalopMLl (2010) Selection of autochthonous Oenococcus oeni strains according to their oenological properties and vinification results. International Journal of Food Microbiology137: 230–235.
29.
SieczkowskiN (2004) Maîtrise et intérêts de la co-inoculation levures-bactéries. Revue Française d’œnologie207: 24–28.
30.
SmithPA (2005) Development of an assay to quantify tannins in grape and wine samples. Australian Wine Research Institute Technical Review154: 37–38.
31.
SomersTCEvansME (1977) Spectral evaluation of young red wines: Anthocyanin equilibria, total phenolics, free and molecular SO2, “chemical age”. Journal of Science Food and Agriculture28: 279–287.
32.
UglianoMHenschkePA (2008) Yeasts and wine flavour. In: Moreno-ArribasMVPoloC (eds) Wine chemistry and biochemistry, New York: Springer, pp. 328–348.
33.
UglianoMMoioL (2006) The influence of malolactic fermentation and Oenococcus oeni strain on glycosidic aroma precursors and related volatile compounds of red wine. Journal of Science Food and Agriculture86: 2468–2476.
34.
VivasNGloriesVLaguneLSancierCAugustinM (1994) Estimation de degreé de polymérisation des procyanidines du raisin et du vin par la méthode au p-dimethylaminocinnamaldéhyde. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin28: 319–336.
35.
ZapparoliGTosiEAzzoliniMVagnoliPKriegerS (2009) Bacterial inoculation strategies for the achievement of malolactic fermentation in high alcohol wines. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture30: 49–55.
