There has been recently increased interest in sorghum to substitute the gluten containing cereals in the diet of people suffering from celiac disease. The response surface methodology was used to determine the influence of malting parameters (degree of steeping, germination temperature and time) on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Each parameter was varied at three levels. Malting attributes, considered important to produce high quality malt for the production of lactic acid fermented beverages, were analyzed. The optimized conditions were: degree of steeping 41%, germination temperature 27℃ after 7 days of germination. Under these conditions, the following values of the studied attributes can be obtained: α-amylase 139 U/g, β-amylase 60 U/g, extract 83.8%, free amino nitrogen 117.8 mg/100 g, Kolbach index 26.6%, water-extractable arabinoxylan 0.3 g/L and vitamin B2 114.9 µg/L. Among the tested parameters, the germination time had the highest effect on malting attributes. Although the activity of amylolytic enzymes α- and β-amylase were low, the value of extract was high and comparable to that of barley malt. The obtained results showed that sorghum malt is a promising raw material for the production of lactic acid fermented beverages.
BriggsDEBoultonCABrookesPAStevensR (2004) Brewing: Science and Practice, New York: CRC Press.
5.
BwangangaJ-CBéraFThonartP (2013) Modelling the β-amylase activity during red sorghum malting when Bacillus subtilis is used to control mould growth. Journal of Cereal Science57: 115–119.
6.
CapanzanaMVBuckleKA (1997) Optimisation of germination conditions by response surface methodology of a high amylose rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie30: 155–163.
7.
CharalampopoulosDPandiellaSS (2010) Survival of human derived Lactobacillus plantarum in fermented cereal extracts during refrigerated storage. LWT -- Food Science and Technology43: 431–435.
8.
CharalampopoulosDPandiellaSSWebbC (2002) Growth studies of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria in cereal-based substrates. Journal of Applied Microbiology92: 851–859.
9.
ClaverIPZhangHLiQZhouHZhuK (2010) Optimized conditions of steeping and germination and their effect on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] composition. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition9: 686–695.
10.
CorreiaINunesADuarteIFBarrosADelgadilloI (2005) Sorghum fermentation followed by spectroscopic techniques. Food Chemistry90: 853–859.
11.
DendyDAV (1995) Sorghum and Millets: Chemistry and Technology, St. Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists.
12.
Dewar J. (2003). Influence of malting on sorghum protein quality. In: Proceedings of AFRIPRO workshop on the proteins of sorghum and millets: enhancing nutritional and functional properties for Africa (eds PS Belton and JRN Taylor), Pretoria, South Africa. Available at: www.afripro.org.uk/papers/Paper18Dewar.pdf.
13.
DewarJTaylorJRNBerjakP (1997) Effect of germination conditions, with optimised steeping, on sorghum malt quality-with particular reference to free amino nitrogen. Journal of the Institute of Brewing103: 171–175.
14.
DufourJPMelotteLSrebrnikS (1992) Sorghum malts for the production of a lager beer. American Society of Brewing Chemists50: 110–119.
15.
ElkhalifaAEOSchifflerBBernhardtR (2005) Effect of fermentation on the functional properties of sorghum flour. Food Chemistry92: 1–5.
16.
EtokakpanOUPalmerGH (1990) Comparative studies of the development of endosperm-degrading enzymes in malting sorghum and barley. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology6: 408–417.
17.
ICC. (2004). Standardmethoden der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Getreidewissenschaft und -technologie. Methodennummer 303: Einfacher und spezifischer Test zur Bestimmung der alpha-Amylase in Getreide, Wien.
18.
IwuohaCIAinaJO (1997) Effects of steeping condition and germination time on the alpha-amylase activity, phenolics content and malting loss of Nigerian local red and hybrid short Kaura sorghum malts. Food Chemistry58: 289–295.
19.
JoglekarAMMayAT (1987) Product excellence through design of experiments. Cereal Foods World32: 857–868.
20.
KhuriAICornellJA (1987) Response Surface Design and Analyses, New York: Marcel Dekker.
21.
KrahlMHagelCZarnkowMBackWKreiszS (2008) Changes of the content of water-soluble bioactive compounds during the malting process of spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum var. spelta). BrewingScience61: 170–174.
22.
KrahlMZarnkowMBackWBeckerT (2010) Determination of the influence of malting parameters on the water-extractable arabinoxylan content of wheat (Triticum aestivum), rye (Secale cereale), and spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum spp. spelta). Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists68: 34–40.
23.
LasekanOOIdowuMALasekanW (1994) Effect of germination and degree of grind (coarse/fine) on the extract and sugar contents of sorghum malts. Food Chemistry53: 125–128.
24.
MalleshiNGDesikacharHSR (1986) Studies on comparative malting characteristics of some tropical cereals and millets. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. Institute of Brewing (Great Britain)92: 174–176.
25.
McClearyBVCoddR (1989) Measurement of beta-amylase in cereal flours and commercial enzyme preparations. Journal of Cereal Science9: 17–33.
26.
MontgomeryDC (2001) Response surface methodology. In: Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York: Wiley, pp. 457–461.
27.
Muñoz-InsaAGastlMZarnkowMBeckerT (2011) Optimization of the malting process of oat (Avena sativa L.) as a raw material for fermented beverages. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research9: 510–523.
28.
Muoria J. (2002). Malt and wort properties of Kenyan sorghum varieties germinated for different time periods. Available at: http://ift.confex.com/ift/2002/techprogram/paper_12110.htm.
29.
MuoriaJKBechtelPJ (1998) Diastatic power and alpha-amylase activity in millet, sorghum, and barley grains and malt. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists56: 131–135.
30.
NarzißL (1999) Die Technologie der Malzbereitung, die Bierbrauerei, Stuttgart, Germany: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.
31.
OchandaSOOnyangoCAMwasaruAMOchiengJKMathookoFM (2010) Effects of malting and fermentation treatments on group B-vitamins of red sorghum, white sorghum and pearl millets in Kenya. Journal of Applied Biosciences34: 2128–2134.
32.
OgbonnaACObiSKCOkoloBN (2004) Optimization of proteolytic activities in malting sorghum. Process Biochemistry39: 713–718.
33.
OkoliEVOkoloBNMonekeANIreFS (2010) Effects of cultivar and germination time on amylolytic potential, extract yield and wort fermenting properties of malting sorghum. Asian Journal of Biotechnology2: 14–26.
34.
PalmerGH (1991) Enzymic degradation of the endosperm cell walls of germinated sorghum. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology7: 17–21.
35.
PalmerGH (1992) Sorghum–food, beverage and brewing potentials. Process Biochemistry27: 145–153.
36.
PalmerGHEtokakpanOUIgyorMA (1989) Sorghum as brewing material. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology5: 265–275.
37.
RatnavathiCVRaviSB (1991) Effect of different durations of steeping and malting on the production of Alpha-amylase in sorghum. Journal of Cereal Science14: 287–296.
38.
RooneyLWSaldivarSO(2003) Sorghum. In: BenjaminC (ed.) Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 5370–5375.
39.
Rozada-SanchezRSatturAPThomasKPandiellaSS (2008) Evaluation of Bifidobacterium spp. for the production of a potentially probiotic malt-based beverage. Process Biochemistry43: 848–854.
40.
TaylorJRNRobbinsDJ (1993) Factors influencing beta-amylase activity in sorghum malt. Journal of the Institute of Brewing99: 413–416.
41.
TaylorJRNSchoberTJBeanSR (2006) Novel food and non-food uses for sorghum and millets. Journal of Cereal Science44: 252–271.
42.
ToppingDLCliftonPM (2001) Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiological Reveiws81(3): 1031–1064.
43.
TsapatsarisSKotzekidouP (2004) Application of central composite design and response surface methodology to the fermentation of olive juice by Lactobacillus plantarum and Debaryomyces hansenii. International Journal of Food Microbiology95: 157–168.
44.
UriyoMEigelWE (1999) Duration of kilning treatment on α-amylase, β-amylase and endo-(1,3)(1,4)-β-d-glucanase activity of malted sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Process Biochemistry35: 433–436.
45.
WaniskaRDRooneyLWMcDonoughCM(2004) Sorghum: utilization. In: ColinW (ed.) Encyclopedia of Grain Science, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 126–136.
46.
ZarnkowMMauchABurbergFBackWArendtEAKreiszS (2009) Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) a Sustainable Raw Material for the Malting and Brewing Process. BrewingScience Monatsschrift für Brauwissenschaft62: 119–140. (July/August).
47.
ZarnkowMAlmaguerCBurbergFBackWArendtEKKreiszS (2008) The use of response surface methodology to optimise malting conditions of Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) as a raw material for gluten-free foods. BrewingScience Monatsschrift für Brauwissenschaft61(5/6): 94–104.
