In this article 11 commercial sweet cherry cultivars were selected to evaluate sensory, nutritive and functional properties over the maturation process on tree. Fruit quality was significantly different among cultivars and maturity stages at harvest, with the highest quality scores being found in the harvest which was 4 days beyond current commercial harvest maturity for all the cultivars tested. Taking into account all of the measured parameters (weight, firmness, color, acidity and total soluble solids), ‘NY-6479’, ‘Prime Giant’ and ‘Sunburst’ could be classified as having the highest quality in terms of sensory attributes. However, ‘Cristalina’ and ‘Sonata’ had the highest functional quality, as determined by the measurement of bioactive compound content and antioxidant capacity. We conclude that a delay of a few days in harvesting of sweet cherries would lead to achieve maximal nutritional (highest sugar and organic acid contents), sensory (greatest firmness and color development) and functional (greatest phenolics content, anthocyanins and antioxidant capacity) quality to provide both eating enjoyment and health benefits to the consumer.
Arnao M.B., Cano A. and Acosta M. ( 2001). The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry73: 239-244.
2.
Batisse C., Buret M. and Coulomb P.J. ( 1996). Biochemical differences in cell wall of cherry fruit between soft and crisp fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry44: 453-457.
3.
Beyer M., Hahn R., Peschel S., Harz M. and Knoche M. ( 2002). Analysing fruit shape in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) . Scientia Horticulturae96: 139-150.
4.
Chaovanalikit A. and Wrolstad R.E. ( 2004). Total anthocyanin and total phenolics of fresh and processed cherries and their antioxidant properties. Journal of Food Science69: FCT67-FCT72.
5.
Chistesen J.V. ( 1995). Evaluation of fruit characteristics of 20 sweet cherry cultivars. Fruit Varieties Journal49: 113-117.
6.
Crisosto C.H. ( 1994). Stone fruit indices: a descriptive review. Postharvest News Information5: 65N-68N.
7.
Crisosto C.H., Crisosto G.M. and Metheney P. ( 2003). Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biology and Technology28: 159-167.
8.
Crisosto C.H., Crisosto G.M. and Ritenour M.A. ( 2002). Testing the reliability of skin color as an indicator of quality for early season ‘Brooks’ (Prunus avium L.) cherry . Postharvest Biology and Technology24: 147-154.
9.
Drake S.R. and Elfving D.C. ( 2002). Indicators of maturity and storage quality of ‘Lapins’ sweet cherry. HortTechnology12: 687-690.
10.
Esti M., Cinquante L., Sinesio F., Moneta E. and Matteo M. ( 2002). Physicochemical and sensory fruit characteristic of two sweet cherry cultivars after cool storage. Food Chemistry76: 399-405.
11.
FAO (2005). Statistical Databases . Available at: http://faostat.fao.org. (accessed July 2008).
12.
Gao L. and Mazza G. ( 1995). Characterization, quantification, and distribution of anthocyanins and colorless phenolic in sweet cherries. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry43: 343-346.
13.
Gerardi C., Blando F., Santino A. and Zacheo G. ( 2001). Purification and characterisation of a β-glucosidase abundantly expressed in ripe sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit. Plant Science160: 795-805.
14.
Girard B. and Kopp T.G. ( 1998). Physicochemical characteristics of selected sweet cherry cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry46: 471-476.
15.
Gonçalves B., Landbo A.K., Knudse D., Silva A.P., Moutinho-Pereia J., Rosa E. and Meyer A.S. ( 2004). Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the phenolic profiles of cherries (Prunus avium L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry52: 523-530.
16.
Gonçalves B., Moutinho-Pereira J., Santos A., Silva A.P., Barcelar E., Correira C. and Rosa E. ( 2006). Scion-rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiology26: 93-104.
17.
Kang S.Y., Seeram N.P., Nair M.G. and Bourquin L.D. ( 2003). Tart cherry anthocyanins inhibit tumor development in ApcMin mice and reduce proliferation of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Letters194: 13-19.
18.
Kaur C. and Kapoor H.C. ( 2001). Antioxidants in fruit and vegetables- The millennium’ health. International Journal of Food Science and Technology36: 703-725.
19.
Kim D.O., Heo H.J., Kim Y.J., Yang H.S. and Lee C.Y. ( 2005). Sweet and sour cherry and their protective effects on neuronal cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry53: 9921-9927.
20.
Kris-Etherton P.M., Hecker K.D., Bonanome A., Coval S.M., Binkoski A.E., Hilpert K.F., Grield A.E. and Etherton T.D. ( 2002). Bioactive compounds in foods: their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. American Journal of Medicine113: 71-88.
21.
Mozetiĉ B., Simĉiĉ M. and Trebse P. ( 2006). Anthocyanins and hydroxycinnamic acids of Lambert Compact cherries (Prunus avium L.) after cold storage and 1-methylcyclorpoene treatments . Food Chemistry97: 302-309.
22.
Mozetiĉ B., Trebse P., Simĉiĉ M. and Hribar J. ( 2004). Changes of anthocyanins and hydroxycinnamic acids affecting the skin color during maturation of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Lebensmittel Wisssenchaft und Technologie37: 123-128.
23.
Mozetiĉ B., Trebse P. and Hribar J. ( 2002). Determination and quanitation of anthocyanins and hydroxycinnamic acids in different cultivars of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) from Nova Gorica Region (Slovenia). Food Technology and Biotechnology40: 207-212.
24.
Muskovics G., Felföldi J., Kovács E., Perlaki R. and Kállay T. ( 2006). Changes in physical properties during fruit ripening of Hungarian sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. Postharvest Biology and Technology40: 56-63.
25.
Predieri S., Dris R. and Rapparini F. ( 2004). Influence of growing conditions on yield and quality of cherry: II. Fruit quality. Food, Agriculture and Environment2: 307-309.
26.
Pretel M.T., Botella M.A., Zapata P.J., Amorós A. and Serrano M. ( 2004). Antioxidative activity and general fruit characteristics in different traditional orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) varieties. European Food Research and Technology219: 474-478.
27.
Romano G.S., Cittadini E.D., Pugh B. and Schouten R. ( 2006). Sweet cherry quality in the horticultural production chain. Stewart Postharvest Review6(2): 1-7.
28.
Scalbert A., Manach C., Morand C., Rémésy C. and Jiménez L. ( 2005). Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases . Critical Review Food Science and Nutrition45: 287-306.
29.
Schreiner M. and Huyskens-Keil S. ( 2006). Phytochemicals in fruit and vegetables: health promotion and postharvest elicitors. Critical Review in Plant Science25: 267-278.
30.
Serrano M., Guillén F., Martínez-Romero D., Castillo S. and Valero D. ( 2005a). Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry53: 2741-2745.
31.
Serrano M., Martínez-Romero D., Castillo S., Guillén F. and Valero D. ( 2005b). The use of antifungal compounds improves the beneficial effect of MAP in sweet cherry storage. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies6: 115-123.
32.
Singleton V.L., Orthofer R. and Lamuela-Raventos R.M. ( 1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin- Ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology299: 152-178.
33.
Tall J.M., Seeram N.P., Zhao C., Nair M.G., Meyer R.A. and Raja S.N. ( 2004). Tart cherry anthocyanins suppress inflammation-induced pain behaviour in rat. Behavioural Brain Research153: 181-188.
34.
Tomás-Barberán F.A. and Espín J.C. (2001). Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture81: 853-876.
35.
Tomás-Barberán F.A. , Gil M.I., Cremin P., Waterhouse A.L., Hess-Pierce B. and Kader A.A. (2001). HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry49: 4748-4760.
36.
Usenik V., Fabčič J. and Štampar F. ( 2008). Sugars, organic acids, phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Food Chemistry107: 185-192.
37.
Usenik V., Kastelec D. and Štampar F. ( 2005). Physicochemical changes of sweet cherry fruits related to application of gibberellic acid. Food Chemistry90: 663-671.
38.
Wang H., Cao G. and Prior R.L. ( 1996). Total antioxidant capacity of fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry44: 701-705.
39.
Wu X., Beecher G.R., Holden J.M., Haytowitz D.B., Gebhardt S.E. and Prior R.L. ( 2004). Lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant capacities of common foods in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry52: 4026-4037.
40.
Zuzunaga M., Serrano M., Martínez-Romero D., Valero D. and Riquelme F. ( 2001). Comparative study of two plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cultivars during growth and ripening. Food Science and Technology International7: 123-130.
