The objective of this paper is to study the impact mechanical performance of piezoelectric materials. Therefore, the three-dimensional frictionless impact contact between a piezoelectric half-space and a conducting rigid impactor is investigated. A semi-analytical impact contact model is developed based on the second-order Newmark method and discrete convolution-fast Fourier transform algorithm. The unknown impact reaction force of the impactors is obtained by exploiting the conjugate gradient method and the dichotomy method. A detailed parametric investigation is conducted on different types of impactors to explore the influences of several parameters, including electric charge density, time step, and impact velocity. The results reveal that the impact velocity and electric charge density have significant effects on the impact response of the piezoelectric material. Higher electric charge densities lead to a smaller impact reaction force, but a larger deformation. The insights gained from this study can be applied to analyze the impact response of charged particles of arbitrary shape on piezoelectric material.
BellisCImperileS.Dynamical one-dimensional models of passive piezoelectric sensors. Math Mech Solids2014; 19(5): 451–476.
2.
ShangSMHouPFTongJ.A method for the coupled field of an orthotropic piezoelectric plate subjected to an arbitrary electro-mechanical load. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(11): 2132–2152.
3.
HuHLiZWWangXD.Modelling and analysis of piezoelectric actuators with partially debonded adhesive layers. Math Mech Solids2021; 26(5): 722–737.
4.
XuDMXuCCaoCQ, et al. Parametric modeling and singularity analysis of a novel 6-PUS parallel robot driven by piezoelectric linear actuators. J Mech Sci Technol2024; 38(6): 3131–3141.
5.
CuiYXYangTLuoHC, et al. Jellyfish-inspired bistable piezoelectric-triboelectric hybrid generator for low-frequency vibration energy harvesting. Int J Mech Sci2024; 279: 109523.
6.
FanT.Modeling of an energy harvester with porous piezoelectric/piezomagnetic nanocomposite structure. Math Mech Solids2022; 27(12): 2588–2602.
7.
AlouiRGahaRLafargeB, et al. Life cycle assessment of piezoelectric devices implemented in wind turbine condition monitoring systems. Energies2024; 17(16): 3928–3928.
8.
CovaciCGonteanA.Piezoelectric energy harvesting solutions: a review. Sensors2020; 20(12): 3512.
9.
QingXLLiWZWangYS, et al. Piezoelectric transducer-based structural health monitoring for aircraft applications. Sensors2019; 19(3): 545–545.
10.
ZhangXYWangYGaoXY, et al. High-temperature and flexible piezoelectric sensors for lamb-wave-based structural health monitoring. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13(40): 47764–47772.
11.
WangYDMaoQBHuangSZ, et al. Fault diagnosis for piezoelectric modal sensor array of helicopter blade. Chin J Sens Actuators2023; 36(5): 686–691.
12.
MaXWangZYZhouB, et al. A study on performance of distributed piezoelectric composite actuators using Galerkin method. Smart Mater Struct2019; 28(10): 105049.
13.
GuptaVSharmaMThakurN.Optimization criteria for optimal placement of piezoelectric sensors and actuators on a smart structure: a technical review. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2010; 21(12): 1227–1243.
14.
HeGYSunDYChenJ, et al. Key problems affecting the anti-erosion coating performance of aero-engine compressor: a review. Coat2019; 9(12): 821.
15.
BousserEMartinuLKlemberg-SapiehaJ.Solid particle erosion mechanisms of protective coatings for aerospace applications. Surf Coat Technol2014; 257: 165–181.
16.
QiuLDengXLYuanSF, et al. Impact monitoring for aircraft smart composite skins based on a lightweight sensor network and characteristic digital sequences [J]. Sensors2018; 18(7): 2218–2218.
17.
ZhuCXuZYHouC, et al. Flexible, monolithic piezoelectric sensors for large-area structural impact monitoring via MUSIC-assisted machine learning. Struct Health Monit2024; 23(1): 121–136.
18.
HuJHTjiuN.Dependence of electric energy output from a lead zirconate titanate ceramic piezoelectric element on impact conditions. Mater Chem Phys2011; 128(1–2): 172–176.
19.
SikdarSMirgalPBanerjeeS.Lowvelocity impact source localization in a composite sandwich structure using a broadband piezoelectric sensor network. Compos Struct2022; 291: 115619.
20.
HwangMYKangLH.Characteristics and fabrication of piezoelectric GFRP using smart resin prepreg for detecting impact signals. Compos Sci Technol2018; 167: 224–233.
21.
PanQSZhaoMFWangY, et al. Design, simulation, and motion characteristics of a novel impact piezoelectric actuator using double stators. Smart Mater Struct2022; 31(7): 075012.
22.
LopesMVDiasAPCEckertJJ, et al. Design of triple-beam internal-impact piezoelectric harvester optimized for energy and bandwidth. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(6): 242.
ShivashankarHWonTK.Detection of physical signal and time-frequency analysis owing to the impact on rubber material using a piezoelectric sensor. J Mech Sci Technol2024; 38(5): 2455–2463.
25.
JirungnimitsakulSSomwanSLimpichaipanitA, et al. Electrical signal of piezoelectric buzzer by impact testing. Integr Ferroelectr2019; 195(1): 178–186.
26.
XieJH. Simulation Analysis on impact location detection for piezoelectric smart structures. Int Conf Mech Ind Manuf Eng2011; 36–39.
27.
SunSCaoSJiangN, et al. Experimental study on a impact piezoelectric generator. J Vib Shock2012; 31(17): 95–98.
28.
SuiYWangWZZhangHB.Effects of electromagnetic fields on the contact of magnetoelectroelastic materials. Int J Mech Sci2022; 223: 107283.
29.
SuiYWangWZZhangHB, et al. 3D frictional contact of graded magneto-electro-elastic film-substrate system under electromagnetic fields. Int J Solids Struct2023; 269: 112217.
30.
GongWHXieHYWangYH.Semi-analytical and semi-numerical method for dynamic analysis of foundation. Appl Math Mech2006; 27(5): 607–615.
31.
ZhangXWangZShenHM, et al. Frictional contact involving a multiferroic thin film subjected to surface magnetoelectroelastic effects. Int J Mech Sci2017; 131–132: 633–648.
32.
WangZJJinXQZhouQH, et al. An efficient numerical method with a parallel computational strategy for solving arbitrarily shaped inclusions in elastoplastic contact problems. J Tribol2013; 135(3): 031401.
33.
ZhangXWangZJShenHM, et al. An efficient model for the frictional contact between two multiferroic bodies. Int J Solids Struct2018; 130: 133–152.
34.
JacqCNé’liasDLormandG, et al. Development of a three-dimensional semi-analytical elastic-plastic contact code. J Tribol2002; 124(4): 653–667.
35.
QiKZhouQYangW.Impact contact mechanical performance evaluation of coated medium by semi-analytical method. Surf Coat Technol2022; 444: 128689.
36.
ChaiseTNeliasDSadeghiF.On the effect of isotropic hardening on the coefficient of restitution for single or repeated impacts using a semi-analytical method. Tribol Trans2011; 54(5): 714–722.
37.
YangWBaiPFangJ, et al. Impact contact behaviors of elastic coated medium with imperfect interfaces. Int J Mech Sci2022; 236: 107743.
38.
QiKAZhouQHYangWY, et al. A semi-analytical approach for elastoplastic impact-contact involving coated medium. Int J Solids Struct2023; 283: 112467.
39.
PolonskyIAKeerLM.A numerical method for solving rough contact problems based on the multilevel multisummation and conjugate gradient techniques. Wear1999; 231(2): 206–219.
40.
DingHJChenBLiangJ.General solutions for coupled equations for piezoelectric media. Int J Solids Struct1996; 33(16): 2283–2298.
41.
WangXMShenYP.The conservation laws and path-independent integrals with an application for linear electro/magneto-elastic media. Int J Solids Struct1996; 33(6): 865–878.
42.
ChenWQ.On piezoelastic contact problem for a smooth punch. Int J Solids Struct2000; 37(16): 2331–2340.
43.
ChenWQPanEWangH, et al. Theory of indentation on multiferroic composite materials. J Mech Phys Solids2010; 58(10): 1524–1551.
44.
YuCJWangZJWangQJ.Analytical frequency response functions for contact of multilayered materials. Mech Mater2014; 76: 102–120.
45.
WangZJYuCJWangQ.An efficient method for solving three-dimensional fretting contact problems involving multilayered or functionally graded materials. Int J Solids Structs2015; 66: 46–61.
46.
TaroMChaiseTNeliasD.Modeling of ultra-high-speed impact at the surface of an elastic half-space. Wave Motion2015; 58: 77–100.
47.
WangXTLiuJHuB, et al. Wave propagation responses of porous bidirectional functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic nanoshells via nonlocal strain gradient theory. Appl Math Mech2023; 44(10): 1821–1840.
