About the number of hinges at failure of semicircular and pointed masonry arches

Abstract

The collapse of masonry arches under static loads mainly occurs because some voussoir interfaces open and form hinges and eventually transform the structure into a mechanism. There is an interest in the maximum number of concurrent hinges at a given arch geometry and stereotomy, which latter refers to the cutting pattern of the voussoirs. This paper applies the governing equations of a geometrically exact rod to thrust line analysis while it adopts the Heymanian assumptions. With the new model, the number of concurrent hinges can be investigated in an organized and predictive manner generalizing the numerical and analytical results of the literature. Specifically, this paper proves that the number of hinges for a symmetric, circular pointed arch loaded by self-weight cannot exceed seven in the cases of vertical stereotomy and constant thickness in the vertical or normal directions. The maximum number of hinges is also seven for an arch with constant thickness and radial stereotomy.

Keywords

Masonry arch failure mode thrust line geometrically exact rod equations maximal number of hinges

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Heyman

Safety of masonry arches. Int J Mech Sci 1969; 11: 363–385.

Cocchetti

Colasante

Rizzi

On the analysis of minimum thickness in circular masonry arches. Appl Mech Rev 2012; 64(5): 050802.

Gáspár

Sipos

Sajtos

Effect of stereotomy on the lower bound value of minimum thickness of semi-circular masonry arches. Int J Arch Herit 2018; 12(6): 899–921.

Fallacara

Gadaleta

Stereotomy: architecture and mathematics. In: Sriraman

(ed.) Handbook of the mathematics of the arts and sciences. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 1325–1344.

Alexakis

Makris

Minimum thickness of elliptical masonry arches. Acta Mech 2013; 224: 2977–2991.

Bagi

When Heyman’s Safe Theorem of rigid block systems fails: non-Heymanian collapse modes of masonry structures. Int J Solids Struct 2014; 51(14): 2696–2705.

Rizzi

Colasante

Frigerio

, et al. On the mixed collapse mechanism of semi-circular masonry arches. In: SAHC2012: 8th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Wroclaw, 15–17 October 2012, pp. 541–549. Wroclaw: DWE.

Nikolić

Thrust line analysis and the minimum thickness of pointed masonry arches. Acta Mech 2017; 228(6): 2219–2236.

Romano

Ochsendorf

JA.

The mechanics of gothic masonry arches. Int J Arch Herit 2010; 4(1): 59–82.

10.

Lengyel

Minimum thickness of the gothic arch. Arch Appl Mech 2018; 88: 769–788.

11.

Gáspár

Sajtos

Sipos

AA.

Multi-hinge failure mechanisms of masonry arches subject to self-weight as derived from minimum thickness analysis. Int J Arch Herit 2022; 17: 1–29. (Accepted for publication).

12.

Antman

Nonlinear problems in elasticity. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2005.

13.

Schuricht

A variational approach to obstacle problems for shearable nonlinearly elastic rods. Arch Rat Mech Anal 1997; 140(2): 103–159.

14.

van der Heijden

GHM

. A robust variational formulation for a rod subject to inequality constraints. In: Gao

(ed.) Complementarity, duality and symmetry in nonlinear mechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2004, pp. 313–325.

15.

Nikolić

A note on the catenary arch bending ‘moment’ free paradox. Meccanica 2022; 57: 1457–1462.

16.

Healey

Mehta

PG.

Straightforward computation of spatial equilibria of geometrically exact Cosserat rods. Int J Bifur Chaos 2005; 15(3): 949–965.

17.

Gáspár

Sipos

AÁ

Sajtos

. The role of rotational collapse mode and catenary-type thrust lines in the limit state analysis of masonry arches. In: Proceedings of IASS annual symposia, Barcelona, 7–10 October 2019, pp. 1–8. Madrid: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS).