In this paper, we corroborate the main theorems establishing the justification of Koiter’s model, established by Ciarlet and his associates, for all the types of linearly elastic shells via a set of numerical experiments.
KoiterWT. A consistent first approximation in the general theory of thin elastic shells. In: Proceedings of the symposium on thin elastic shells, Delft, 24–28 August 1959, pp. 12–33. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2.
KoiterWT. On the foundations of the linear theory of thin elastic shells. I, II. Nederl Akad Wetensch Proc Ser B1970; 73: 169–182 and 183–195.
3.
CiarletPG. Mathematical elasticity: theory of shells. Vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2000.
4.
CiarletPGLodsV. Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic shells. III. Justification of Koiter’s shell equations. Arch Rational Mech Anal1996; 136: 191–200.
5.
CaillerieDSánchez-PalenciaE.A new kind of singular stiff problems and application to thin elastic shells. Math Models Methods Appl Sci1995; 5(1): 47–66.
6.
CaillerieDSánchez-PalenciaE.Elastic thin shells: asymptotic theory in the anisotropic and heterogeneous cases. Math Models Methods Appl Sci1995; 5(4): 473–496.
7.
TelegaJJLewińskiT. Homogenization of linear elastic shells: Γ-convergence and duality. Part I. Formulation of the problem and the effective model. Bull Polish Acad Sci Techincal Sci1998; 46: 1–9.
8.
TelegaJJLewińskiT. Homogenization of linear elastic shells: Γ-convergence and duality. Part II. Dual homogenization. Bull Polish Acad Sci, Techincal Sci1998; 46: 11–21.
9.
CiarletPGLodsV.On the ellipticity of linear membrane shell equations. J Math Pures Appl1996; 75: 107–124.
10.
CiarletPGLodsV. Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic shells. I. Justification of membrane shell equations. Arch Rational Mech Anal1996; 136: 119–161.
11.
CiarletPGPiersantiP.Obstacle problems for Koiter’s shells. Math Mech Solids2019; 24: 3061–3079.
12.
CiarletPGPiersantiP.A confinement problem for a linearly elastic Koiter’s shell. CR Acad Sci Paris Sér I2019; 357: 221–230.
13.
CiarletPGLodsVMiaraB. Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic shells. II. Justification of flexural shell equations. Arch Rational Mech Anal1996; 136: 163–190.
14.
CiarletPGMardareCPiersantiP.Un problème de confinement pour une coque membranaire linéairement élastique de type elliptique. C R Math Acad Sci Paris2018; 356(10): 1040–1051.
15.
CiarletPGMardareCPiersantiP.An obstacle problem for elliptic membrane shells. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(5): 1503–1529.
16.
BockIJarušekJ.On hyperbolic contact problems. Tatra Mt Math Publ2009; 43: 25–40.
17.
BockIJarušekJ.Dynamic contact problem for viscoelastic von Kármán–Donnell shells. ZAMM Z Angew Math Mech2013; 93: 733–744.
18.
BockIJarušekJŠilhavýM.On the solutions of a dynamic contact problem for a thermoelastic von Kármán plate. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl2016; 32: 111–135.
19.
PiersantiP.A time-dependent obstacle problem in linearised elasticity. Nonlinear Anal2020; 192: 111660.
20.
PiersantiP.An existence and uniqueness theorem for the dynamics of flexural shells. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(2): 317–336.
21.
PiersantiP.On the justification of Koiter’s model for thermoelastic shells. J Differential Equations2021; 296: 50–106.
22.
ShenXLiH.The time-dependent Koiter model and its numerical computation. Appl Math Model2018; 55: 131–144.
23.
PiersantiP.On the improved interior regularity of the solution of a fourth order elliptic problem modelling the displacement of a linearly elastic shallow shell lying subject to an obstacle. Asymptot Anal2022; 127(1–2): 35–55.
24.
PiersantiP.Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic elliptic membrane shells subjected to an obstacle. J Differential Equations2022; 320: 114–142.
25.
PiersantiPShenX.Numerical methods for static shallow shells lying over an obstacle. Numer Algorithms2020; 85: 623–652.
26.
PiersantiPWhiteKDragneaB, et al. Modelling virus contact mechanics under atomic force imaging conditions. Appl Anal2022; 101(11): 3947–3957.
27.
PiersantiPWhiteKDragneaB, et al. A three-dimensional discrete model for approximating the deformation of a viral capsid subject to lying over a flat surface. Anal Appl2022; 20(6): 1159–1191.
28.
Rodríguez-ArósA.Mathematical justification of the obstacle problem for elastic elliptic membrane shells. Applicable Anal2018; 97: 1261–1280.
29.
ShenXJiaJZhuS, et al. The time-dependent generalized membrane shell model and its numerical computation. Comput Method Appl M2019; 344: 54–70.
30.
ShenXPiersantiLPiersantiP.Numerical simulations for the dynamics of flexural shells. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(4): 887–912.
31.
ShenXYangQLinB, et al. Numerical approximation of the dynamic Koiter’s model for the hyperbolic parabolic shell. Appl Numer Math2020; 150: 194–205.
32.
ShenXYangQLinB, et al. Full discretization scheme for the dynamic of elliptic membrane shell. Commun Comput Phys2021; 29(1): 186–210.
33.
CiarletPG.An introduction to differential geometry with applications to elasticity. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
34.
CiarletPG.Mathematical elasticity: three-dimensional elasticity. Vol. I. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988.
BernadouMCiarletPG.Sur l’ellipticité du modèle linéaire de coques de W. T. Koiter. In: Computing methods in applied sciences and engineering (second international symposium), Versailles, 15– 19 December 1975, pp. 89–136. Berlin: Springer.
37.
BernadouMCiarletPGMiaraB.Existence theorems for two-dimensional linear shell theories. J Elasticity1994; 34: 111–138.
38.
CiarletPGDestuynderP.A justification of the two-dimensional linear plate model. J Mécanique1979; 18: 315–344.
39.
CiarletPG.The finite element method for elliptic problems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978.
40.
HechtF.New development in FreeFem ++. Numer Math2012; 20(3–4): 251–265.
41.
AhrensJGeveciBLawC.Paraview: an end-user tool for large data visualization. The visualization handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
42.
MATLAB version 7.10.0 (R2010a). Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc., 2010.
ZienkiewiczOCTaylorRLZhuJZ.The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. 7th ed.Amsterdam: Butterworth Heinemann, 2013.
45.
MardareC.The generalized membrane problem for linearly elastic shells with hyperbolic or parabolic middle surface. J Elasticity1998; 51(2): 145–165.
46.
ShenXXueYYangQ, et al. Finite element method coupling penalty method for flexural shell. Appl Math Mech2021; 14: 365–385.
47.
XiaoL.Asymptotic analysis of dynamic problems for linearly elastic shells—justification of equations for dynamic Koiter shells. Chin Ann Math Ser B2001; 22(3): 267–274.
48.
XiaoL.Asymptotic analysis of dynamic problems for linearly elastic shells—justification of equations for dynamic flexural shells. Chin Ann Math Ser B2001; 22(1): 13–22.
49.
Cao-RialMTCastiñeiraGRodríguez-ArósÁ, et al. Asymptotic analysis of elliptic membrane shells in thermoelastodynamics. J Elasticity2021; 143(2): 385–409.
