In this paper, we present a novel theoretical model of bone evolution. The model takes into account growth of the blood vessels network as a real issue during the process. The stimulation of this growth is controlled by the signals from overloaded dying cells. A system of integro-differential equations describes changes in the density of blood vessels, bone cells and Young modulus, all of which define how the bone tissue evolves over time. The model considers several biomechanical signals such as changes in the density of elastic strain energy and nutrients. Two examples of changing bone tissue were examined to test the model: bone healing around a tooth implant and formation of osteophytes during osteoarthritis. In both cases, the effects of mechanical loading in the bone tissue evolution which are in agreement with the medical observations can be observed.
StreetJBaoMdeGuzmanL, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates bone repair by promoting angiogenesis and bone turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2002; 99(15): 9656–9661.
2.
HankensonKDDishowitzMGrayC, et al. Angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Injury2011; 42(6): 556–561.
3.
SaranUPiperniSGChatterjeeS.Role of angiogenesis in bone repair. Arch Biochem Biophys2014; 561: 109–117.
4.
WazenRMCurreyJAGuoH, et al. Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces. Acta Biomater2013; 9(5): 6663–6674.
5.
LeuchtPKimJBWazenR, et al. Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants. Bone2007; 40(4): 919–930.
6.
GiorgioISpagnuoloMAndreausU, et al. In-depth gaze at the astonishing mechanical behavior of bone: A review for designing bio-inspired hierarchical metamaterials. Math Mech Solids2020; 25: 944–962.
7.
GiorgioIAndreausUScerratoD, et al. Modeling of a non-local stimulus for bone remodeling process under cyclic load: Application to a dental implant using a bioresorbable porous material. Math Mech Solids2017; 22(9): 1790–1805.
8.
GiorgioIdell’IsolaFAndreausU, et al. On mechanically driven biological stimulus for bone remodeling as a diffusive phenomenon. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2019; 18(6): 1617–1663.
9.
GiorgioIAndreausUMadeoA.The influence of different loads on the remodeling process of a bone and bio-resorbable material mixture with voids. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2016; 28(1–2): 21–40.
10.
GeorgeDAllenaRRémondY.A multiphysics stimulus for continuum mechanics bone remodeling. Math Mech Complex Syst2018; 6(4): 307–319.
11.
GeorgeDAllenaRBourzacC, et al. A new comprehensive approach for bone remodeling under medium and high mechanical load based on cellular activity. Math Mech Complex Syst2020; 8(4): 287–306.
12.
LinDLiQLiW, et al. Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant. J Biomech2010; 43(2): 287–293.
13.
CaranoRFilvaroffE.Angiogenesis and bone repair. Drug Discov Today2003; 8(21): 980–989.
14.
GerisL.Mathematical modelling of bone regeneration during fracture healing and implant osseointegration. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2007.
15.
LinDLiQLiW, et al. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2009; 2(5): 410–432.
16.
Della CorteAGiorgioIScerratoD. A review of recent developments in mathematical modeling of bone remodeling. Proc IMechE H J Eng Med2020; 234(3): 273–281.
17.
PlacidiLBarchiesiE.Energy approach to brittle fracture in strain-gradient modelling. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2018; 474(2210): 20170878.
18.
PlacidiLMisraABarchiesiE.Simulation results for damage with evolving microstructure and growing strain gradient moduli. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(4): 1143–1163.
19.
PlacidiLMisraABarchiesiE.Two-dimensional strain gradient damage modeling: a variational approach. Z angew Math Phys2018; 69(3): 56.
20.
PlacidiLBarchiesiEMisraA.A strain gradient variational approach to damage: A comparison with damage gradient models and numerical results. Math Mech Complex Syst2018; 6(2): 77–100.
21.
EremeyevVASkrzatAVinakuravaA.Application of the micropolar theory to the strength analysis of bioceramic materials for bone reconstruction. Strength Mater2016; 48(4): 573–582.
22.
EremeyevVASkrzatAStachowiczF.Linear micropolar elasticity analysis of stresses in bones under static loads. Strength Mater2017; 49(4): 575–585.
23.
BarchiesiESpagnuoloMPlacidiL.Mechanical metamaterials: A state of the art. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(1): 212–234.
24.
dell’IsolaFAndreausUPlacidiL.At the origins and in the vanguard of peridynamics, non-local and higher-gradient continuum mechanics: An underestimated and still topical contribution of Gabrio Piola. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(8): 887–928.
25.
LaudatoMCiallellaA.Perspectives in generalized continua. In: AbaliBEGiorgioI (eds.) Developments and Novel Approaches in Biomechanics and Metamaterials. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 1–13.
26.
AlibertJJSeppecherPdell’IsolaF.Truss modular beams with deformation energy depending on higher displacement gradients. Math Mech Solids2003; 8(1): 51–73.
27.
GerisLGerischASlotenJV, et al. Angiogenesis in bone fracture healing: A bioregulatory model. J Theoret Biol2008; 251: 137–158.
28.
MoreoPGarcía-AznarMJMDoblaréM.Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model. J Theoret Biol2009; 260(1): 1–12.
29.
ChouHYJagodnikJJMuftuS.Predictions of bone remodeling around dental implant systems. J Biomech2008; 41: 1365–1373.
30.
ScerratoDBersaniAGiorgioI.Bio-inspired design of a porous resorbable scaffold for bone reconstruction: A preliminary study. Biomimetics2021; 6: 1–20.
31.
PeirceSM.Computational and mathematical modeling of angiogenesis. Microcirculation2008; 15(8): 739–751.
32.
ChecaSPrendergastP.A mechanobiological model for tissue differentiation that includes angiogenesis: A lattice-based modeling approach. Ann Biomed Eng2009; 31(7): 129–145.
33.
ChecaSPrendergastPJ.Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: A mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. J Biomech2010; 45(5): 961–968.
34.
PrendergastPJHuiskesRSøballeK.Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech1997; 30(6): 539–548.
35.
BednarczykELekszyckiTGlinkowskiW.Effect of micro-cracks on the angiogenesis and osteophyte development during degenerative joint disease. Comput Assist Meth Eng Sci2017; 24(3): 149–156.
36.
KanczlerJOreffoR.Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone. Eur Cells Mater2008; 15: 100–114.
37.
BednarczykELekszyckiT.A novel mathematical model for growth of capillaries and nutrient supply with application to prediction of osteophyte onset. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(4): 1–14.
38.
BednarczykELekszyckiT.Osteophyte development during osteoarthritis (OA) – consideration of angiogenesis, mechanical loading and tissue microstructure. Eng Trans2016; 64(4): 533–540.
39.
MonodJ.The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu Rev Microbiol1949; 3: 371–394.
40.
BersaniAMBersaniEDell’AcquaG, et al. New trends and perspectives in nonlinear intracellular dynamics: One century from Michaelis–Menten paper. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2015; 27(4-5): 659–684.
41.
ColuzziBBersaniAMBersaniE.An alternative approach to Michaelis–Menten kinetics that is based on the renormalization group. Math Biosci2018; 299: 28–50.
42.
CarmelietPJainRK.Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature2000; 204: 249–257.
43.
ForsterJCHarriss-PhillipsWMDouglassMJJ, et al. A review of the development of tumor vasculature and its effects on the tumor microenvironment. Hypoxia2017; 5: 21–32.
44.
DissauxCWagnerDGeorgeD, et al. Mechanical impairment on alveolar bone graft: A literature review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg2019; 47(1): 149–157.
Portal-NunezSLozanoDEsbritP.Role of angiogenesis on bone formation. Histol Histopathol2012; 27: 559–566.
47.
PlacidiLAndreausUDella CorteA, et al. Gedanken experiments for the determination of two-dimensional linear second gradient elasticity coefficients. Z angew Math Phys2015; 66(6): 3699–3725.
48.
De AngeloMBarchiesiEGiorgioI, et al. Numerical identification of constitutive parameters in reduced-order bi-dimensional models for pantographic structures: Application to out-of-plane buckling. Arch Appl Mech2019; 89(7): 1333–1358.
49.
GiorgioIHarrisonPdell’IsolaF, et al. Wrinkling in engineering fabrics: A comparison between two different comprehensive modelling approaches. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2018; 474(2216): 20180063.
50.
AbaliBEWuCCMüllerWH.An energy-based method to determine material constants in nonlinear rheology with applications. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2016; 28(5): 1221–1246.
51.
FedeleRRakaBHildF, et al. Identification of adhesive properties in glare assemblies using digital image correlation. J Mech Phys Solids2009; 57(7): 1003–1016.
52.
ValorosoNFedeleR.Characterization of a cohesive-zone model describing damage and de-cohesion at bonded interfaces. Sensitivity analysis and mode-I parameter identification. Int J Solids Struct2010; 47(13): 1666–1677.
53.
BarchiesiEEugsterSRdell’IsolaF, et al. Large in-plane elastic deformations of bi-pantographic fabrics: Asymptotic homogenization and experimental validation. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(3): 739–767.
54.
BilottaAMorassiATurcoE.The use of quasi-isospectral operators for damage detection in rods. Meccanica2018; 53(1): 319–345.
55.
TurcoE.Tools for the numerical solution of inverse problems in structural mechanics: Review and research perspectives. Eur J Environ Civ Eng2016; 21: 509–554. DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2015.1134673.
