It is well known that the linearized theory of elasticity admits the logically inconsistent solution of singular strains when applied to certain naive models of fracture while the theory is a first-order approximation to finite elasticity in the asymptotic limit of infinitesimal displacement gradient. Meanwhile, the strain-limiting models, a special subclass of nonlinear implicit constitutive relations, predict uniformly bounded strain in the whole material body including at the strain-concentrator such as a crack tip or reentrant corner. Such a nonlinear approximation cannot be possible within the standard linearization procedure of either Cauchy or Green elasticity. In this work, we examine a finite-element discretization for several boundary value problems to study the state of stress–strain in the solid body of which response is described by a nonlinear strain-limiting theory of elasticity. The problems of notches, oriented cracks, and an interface crack in anti-plane shear are analyzed. The numerical results indicate that the linearized strain remains below a value that can be fixed a priori, therefore, ensuring the validity of the nonlinear model. In addition, we find high stress values in the neighborhood of the crack tip in every example, thereby suggesting that the crack tip acts as a singular energy sink for a stationary crack. We also calculate the stress intensity factor (SIF) in this study. The computed value of SIF in the nonlinear strain-limiting model is corresponding to that of the classical linear model, and thereby providing a tenet for a possible local criterion for fracture. The framework of strain-limiting theories, within which the linearized strain bears a nonlinear relationship with the stress, can provide a rational basis for developing physically meaningful models to study a crack evolution in elastic solids.
GurtinMEMurdochAI.A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch Rat Mech Anal1975; 57(4): 291–323.
6.
SendovaTWaltonJR.A new approach to the modeling and analysis of fracture through extension of continuum mechanics to the nanoscale. Math Mech Solids2010; 15(3): 368–413.
7.
MallikarjunaiahSM.On Two Theories for Brittle Fracture: Modeling and Direct Numerical Simulations. PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2015.
8.
FergusonLAMuddamallappaMWaltonJR.Numerical simulation of mode-III fracture incorporating interfacial mechanics. Int J Fracture2015; 192(1): 47–56.
9.
ZemlyanovaAYWaltonJR.Modeling of a curvilinear planar crack with a curvature-dependent surface tension. SIAM J Appl Math2012; 72(5): 1474–1492.
10.
WaltonJRMuddamallappaM.Plane strain fracture with surface mechanics: Non-local boundary regularization. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Congresses on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ICTAM), 21–26 August 2016, Montreal, Canada.
11.
BrobergKB.Cracks and Fracture. New York: Academic Press, 1999.
12.
KnowlesJKSternbergE.Large deformations near a tip of an interface-crack between two neo-Hookean sheets. J Elasticity1983; 13(3): 257–293.
13.
TarantinoAM.Nonlinear fracture mechanics for an elastic bell material. Q J Mech Appl Math1997; 50(3): 435–456.
RajagopalKR.The elasticity of elasticity. Z Angew Math Phys2007; 58(2): 309–317.
16.
RajagopalKRSrinivasaAR. On the response of non-dissipative solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci463: 357–367.
17.
RajagopalKRSrinivasaAR. On a class of non-dissipative materials that are not hyperelastic. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci465: 493–500.
18.
RajagopalKR.Non-linear elastic bodies exhibiting limiting small strain. Math Mech Solids2011; 16(1): 122–139.
19.
RajagopalKR.Conspectus of concepts of elasticity. Math Mech Solids2011; 16(5): 536–562.
20.
RajagopalKR.On the nonlinear elastic response of bodies in the small strain range. Acta Mechanica2014; 225(6): 1545–1553.
21.
RajagopalKRSaccomandiG.A novel approach to the description of constitutive relations. Front Mater2016; 3: 36.
22.
RajagopalKR.A note on the linearization of the constitutive relations of non-linear elastic bodies. Mech Res Commun2018; 93: 132–137.
23.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR.A note on plane strain and plane stress problems for a new class of elastic bodies. Math Mech Solids2010; 15(2): 229–238.
24.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR.A note on some new classes of constitutive relations for elastic bodies. IMA J Appl Math2015; 80(5): 1287–1299.
25.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR.A nonlinear model for describing the mechanical behaviour of rock. Acta Mechanica2018; 229(1): 251–272.
26.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR. A review of implicit constitutive theories to describe the response of elastic bodies. In:
Constitutive Modelling of Solid Continua, pp. 187–230. New York: Springer, 2020.
27.
RajagopalKRWaltonJR.Modeling fracture in the context of a strain-limiting theory of elasticity: A single anti-plane shear crack. Int J Fracture2011; 169(1): 39–48.
28.
GouKMallikarjunaiahSMRajagopalKRWaltonJR.Modeling fracture in the context of a strain-limiting theory of elasticity: A single plane-strain crack. Int J Eng Sci2015; 88: 73–82.
29.
MallikarjunaiahSMWaltonJR.On the direct numerical simulation of plane-strain fracture in a class of strain-limiting anisotropic elastic bodies. Int J Fracture2015; 192(2): 217–232.
30.
KulvaitVMálekJRajagopalKR.Anti-plane stress state of a plate with a V-notch for a new class of elastic solids. Int J Fracture2013; 179(1-2): 59–73.
31.
BulíčekMMálekJRajagopalKRWaltonJR.Existence of solutions for the anti-plane stress for a new class of “strain-limiting” elastic bodies. Calc Variat Partial Differ Eqns2015; 54(2): 2115–2147.
32.
RajagopalKRZappalortoM.Bodies described by non-monotonic strain–stress constitutive equations containing a crack subject to anti-plane shear stress. Int J Mech Sci2018; 149: 494–499.
33.
KulvaitVMálekJRajagopalKR.The state of stress and strain adjacent to notches in a new class of nonlinear elastic bodies. J Elasticity2019; 135(1–2): 375–397.
34.
OrtizABustamanteRRajagopalKR.A numerical study of a plate with a hole for a new class of elastic bodies. Acta Mechanica2012; 223(9): 1971–1981.
35.
Ortiz-BernardinABustamanteRRajagopalKR.A numerical study of elastic bodies that are described by constitutive equations that exhibit limited strains. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51(3–4): 875–885.
36.
BridgesCRajagopalKR.Implicit constitutive models with a thermodynamic basis: a study of stress concentration. Z angew Math Phys2015; 66(1): 191–208.
37.
KambapalliMKannanKRajagopalKR.Circumferential stress waves in a non-linear cylindrical annulus in a new class of elastic materials. Q J Mech Appl Math2014; 67(2): 193–203.
38.
KannanKRajagopalKRSaccomandiG.Unsteady motions of a new class of elastic solids. Wave Motion2014; 51(5): 833–843.
39.
BustamanteRSfyrisD.Direct determination of stresses from the stress equations of motion and wave propagation for a new class of elastic bodies. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(1): 80–91.
40.
MaganABMasonDPHarleyC.Two-dimensional nonlinear stress and displacement waves for a new class of constitutive equations. Wave Motion2018; 77: 156–185.
41.
MaganABMasonDPHarleyC.Elastic waves in a circular cylinder and cylindrical annulus for a subclass of implicit constitutive equations. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(2): 201–233.
42.
ErbayHAŞengülY.Traveling waves in one-dimensional non-linear models of strain-limiting viscoelasticity. Int J Non-Lin Mech2015; 77: 61–68.
43.
ItouiHKovtunenkoVARajagopalKR.On the states of stress and strain adjacent to a crack in a strain-limiting viscoelastic body. Math Mech Solids2018; 23(3): 433–444.
44.
ZhuHMulianaARajagopalKR.On the nonlinear viscoelastic deformations of composites with prestressed inclusions. Composite Struct2016; 149: 279–291.
45.
ŞengülY.Viscoelasticity with limiting strain. Discrete Contin Dynam Syst2021; 14(1): 57–70.
46.
BulčekMMálekJRajagopalKRSüliE.On elastic solids with limiting small strain: modeling and analysis. EMS Surv Math Sci2014; 1(2): 293–342.
47.
BulčekMMálekJSüliE.Analysis and approximation of a strain-limiting nonlinear elastic model. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(1): 92–118.
48.
GelmettiNSuliE.Spectral approximation of a strain-limiting nonlinear elastic model. Matematički Vesnik2018; 71(1-2).
49.
BonitoAGiraultVSüliE.Finite element approximation of a strain-limiting elastic model. IMA J Numer Anal2020; 40(1): 29–86.
50.
TruesdellC.Hypo-elasticity. J Rat Mech Anal1955; 4: 83–1020.
51.
MaiTWaltonJR.On strong ellipticity for implicit and strain-limiting theories of elasticity. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(2): 121–139.
52.
MaiTWaltonJR.On monotonicity for strain-limiting theories of elasticity. J Elasticity2015; 120(1): 39–65.
53.
BustamanteR.Some topics on a new class of elastic bodies. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2009; 465(2105): 1377–1392.
54.
BulčekMMálekJRajagopalKR, et al. Existence of solutions for the anti-plane stress for a new class of “strain-limiting” elastic bodies. Calc Variat Partial Differ Eqns2015; 54(2): 2115–2147.
55.
CiarletPG.The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2002.
56.
SaadY.Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2003.
57.
EisenstatSC.Efficient implementation of a class of preconditioned conjugate gradient methods. SIAM J Sci Statist Comput1981; 2(1): 1–4.
58.
AlzettaGArndtDBangerthW, et al. The deal. II library, version 9.0. J Numer Math2018; 26(4): 173–183.
59.
BangerthWHeisterTKanschatG.deal.IIDifferential Equations Analysis Library, Technical Reference, 2013. Available at: http://www.dealii.org (accessed 15 May 2021).
60.
IrwinG.Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J Appl Mech1957; 24: 361–364.
61.
BelytschkoTBlackT.Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng1999; 45(5): 601–620.
