A theory for two-dimensional (2D) beams is presented for the case of considering new constitutive equations, wherein the linearized (infinitesimal) strain tensor is assumed to be a nonlinear function of the Cauchy stress tensor. An incremental formulation is developed to solve numerically the resultant equations. Three constitutive equations for elastic bodies are considered: a model wherein we have strain-limiting behavior, a nonlinear model for rock, and a bimodular constitutive equation for rock (which can also be considered as a nonlinear model for rock). Two boundary value problems are studied: the deformation of a cantilever beam with a point load, and a three-point beam with a point load applied on the middle. The numerical results are compared with the predictions of the classical theory for beams for the case of linearized elastic solids. The results for the stresses can be notoriously different, when comparing the predictions of the nonlinear constitutive equations with the results obtained using the linearized theory of elasticity.
RajagopalKR.The elasticity of elasticity. Z Angew Math Phys2007; 58: 309–317.
6.
RajagopalKR.On a new class of models in elasticity. Math Comput Appl2010; 15: 506–528.
7.
RajagopalKR.Conspectus of concepts of elasticity. Math Mech Solids2011; 16: 536–562.
8.
RajagopalKR.Non-linear elastic bodies exhibiting limiting small strain. Math Mech Solids2011; 16: 122–139.
9.
RajagopalKR.On the nonlinear elastic response of bodies in the small strain range. Acta Mech2014; 225: 1545–1553.
10.
RajagopalKR.An implicit constitutive relation for describing the small strain response of porous elastic solids whose material moduli are dependent on the density. Math Mech Solids2021; 26: 1138–1146.
11.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR.A review of implicit constitutive theories to describe the response of elastic bodies. In: MerodioJOgdenRW (eds) Constitutive modelling of solid continua. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 187–230.
12.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR.Solutions of some boundary value problems for a new class of elastic bodies undergoing small strains. Comparison with the predictions of the classical theory of linearized elasticity: part I. Problems with cylindrical symmetry. Acta Mech2015; 226: 1815–1838.
13.
BustamanteRRajagopalKR.A nonlinear model for describing the mechanical behaviour of rock. Acta Mech2018; 229: 251–272.
14.
BustamanteRMonteroSOrtiz-BernardinA.A novel nonlinear constitutive model for rock: numerical assessment and benchmarking. Appl Eng Sci2020; 2: 100012.
15.
GrasleyZEl-HelouRD’AmbrosiaM, et al. Model of infinitesimal nonlinear elastic response of concrete subjected to uniaxial compression. J Eng Mech2015; 141: 04015008.
16.
ShariffMHBMBustamanteR.A consistent isotropic spectral constitutive equation: the infinitesimal strain depends nonlinearly on the stress. Appl Eng Sci2020; 1: 100007.
17.
ShariffMHBMBustamanteR.A spectral approach for nonlinear transversely isotropic elastic bodies, for a new class of constitutive equation: applications to rock mechanics. Acta Mech2020; 231: 4803–4818.
18.
BustamanteROrtizC.A bimodular nonlinear constitutive equation for rock. Appl Eng Sci2021; 8: 100067.
19.
TimoshenkoS.Strength of materials: part I. Elementary theory and problems. 2nd ed.Toronto, ON, Canada; New York; London: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., 1940.
20.
TimoshenkoSGoodierSN.Theory of elasticity. New York; Toronto, ON, Canada: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1951.
21.
ExadaktylosGEVardoulakisIKourkoulisSK.Influence of nonlinearity and double elasticity on flexure of rock beams—I. Technical theory. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38: 4091–4117.
22.
ExadaktylosGEVardoulakisIKourkoulisSK.Influence of nonlinearity and double elasticity on flexure of rock beams—II. Characterization of Dionysos marble. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38: 4119–4145.
23.
PatelSMartinCD.Evaluation of tensile Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of a bi-modular rock from the displacement measurements in a Brazilian test. Rock Mech Rock Eng2018; 51: 361–379.
24.
ChuangTMaiYW.Flexural behavior of strain-softening solids. Int J Solids Struct1989; 25: 1427–1443.
25.
BertCW.Prediction of bending rupture strength of nonlinear materials with different behavior in tension and compression. Int J Non Linear Mech1983; 18: 353–361.
26.
LawsV.Derivation of the tensile stress-strain curve from bending data. J Mater Sci1981; 16: 1299–1304.
27.
JanečkaAPrůšaVRajagopalKR.Euler Bernoulli type theory for elastic bodies with nonlinear response in the small strain range. Arch Mech2016; 68: 3–25.
28.
GuDFuCDaiH, et al. Asymptotic beam theory for non-classical elastic materials. Int J Mech Sci2021; 189: 105950.
29.
WangZSrinivasaARRajagopalKR, et al. Simulation of inextensible elasto-plastic beams based on an implicit rate type model. Int J Non Linear Mech2018; 99: 165–172.
30.
TruesdellCAToupinR.The classical field theories. In: FlüggeS (ed.) Handbuch der Physik, vol. III/1. Berlin: Springer, 1960, pp. 226–793.
31.
DevendiranVKSandeepRKKannanK, et al. A thermodynamically consistent constitutive equation for describing the response exhibited by several alloys and the study of a meaningful physical problem. Int J Solid Struct2017; 108: 1–10.
32.
SrinivasaAR.On a class of Gibbs potential-based nonlinear elastic model with small strains. Acta Mech2015; 226: 571–583.
33.
PrůšaVRajagopalKRTůmaK.Gibbs free energy based representation formula within the context of implicit constitutive relations for elastic solid. Int J Non Linear Mech2020; 121: 103433.
34.
GokulnathCSaravananURajagopalKR.Representations for implicit constitutive relations describing non-dissipative response of isotropic materials. Z Angew Math Phys2017; 68: 1–14.
35.
RajagopalKR.A note on the linearization of the constitutive relations of non-linear elastic bodies. Mech Res Commun2018; 93: 132–137.
