We present a one-dimensional variant of the Irving–Kirkwood–Noll procedure to derive microscopic expressions of internal contact force and moment in one-dimensional nanostructures. We show that these expressions must contain both the potential and kinetic parts: just the potential part does not yield meaningful continuum results. We further specialize these expressions for helically repeating one-dimensional nanostructures for their extension, torsion, and bending deformation. As the Irving–Kirkwood–Noll procedure does not yield expressions of stiffnesses, we resort to a thermodynamic equilibrium approach to first obtain the Helmholtz free energy of the supercell of helically repeating nanostructures. We then obtain expressions of axial force, twisting moment, bending moment, and the associated stiffnesses by taking the first and second derivatives of the Helmholtz free energy with respect to conjugate strain measures. The derived expressions are used in finite-temperature molecular dynamics simulation to study extension, torsion, and bending of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their buckling.
TannerSMGrayJMRogersCT, et al. High-Q GaN nanowire resonators and oscillators. Appl Phys Lett2007; 91(20): 203117.
6.
WangWJiaFHuangQ, et al. A new type of low power thermoelectric micro-generator fabricated by nanowire array thermoelectric material. Microelectron Eng2005; 77(3–4): 223–229.
7.
AlexeMSenzSSchubertMA, et al. Energy harvesting using nanowires?Adv Mater2008; 20(21): 4021–4026.
8.
ChandrasekerKMukherjeeSPaciJT, et al. An atomistic-continuum Cosserat rod model of carbon nanotubes. J Mech Phys Solids2009; 57(6): 932–958.
9.
FangCKumarAMukherjeeS.Finite element analysis of single-walled carbon nanotubes based on a rod model including in-plane cross-sectional deformation. Int J Solids Struct2013; 50(1): 49–56.
10.
GouldTBurtonDA.A Cosserat rod model with microstructure. New J Phys2006; 8(8): 137.
11.
KumarAMukherjeeSPaciJT, et al. A rod model for three dimensional deformations of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Solids Struct2011; 48(20): 2849–2858.
12.
KumarAKumarSGuptaP.A helical Cauchy–Born rule for special Cosserat rod modeling of nano and continuum rods. J Elast2016; 124(1): 81–106.
13.
CauchyAL.On the equilibrium and motion of a system of material points solicited by forces of attraction or mutual repulsion. Exercises in Mathematics1828; 3(1822): 1827.
14.
ClausiusR.XVI. On a mechanical theorem applicable to heat. London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philos Mag J Sci1870; 40(265): 122–127.
15.
IrvingJHKirkwoodJG. The statistical mechanical theory of transport processes. IV. The equations of hydrodynamics. J Chem Phys1950; 18(6): 817–829.
16.
NollW.Die Herleitung der Grundgleichungen der Thermomechanik der Kontinua aus der statistischen Mechanik. J Ration Mech Anal1955; 4: 627–646.
17.
AdmalNCTadmorEB.A unified interpretation of stress in molecular systems. J Elast2010; 100(1–2): 63–143.
18.
HardyRJ.Formulas for determining local properties in molecular dynamics simulation: Shock waves. J Chem Phys1982; 76(1): 622–628.
19.
MurdochAI.The motivation of continuum concepts and relations from discrete considerations. Q J Mech Appl Math1983; 36(2): 163–187.
20.
HardyRJRootSSwansonDR.Continuum properties from molecular simulations. AIP Conf Proc2002; 620(1): 363–366.
21.
ZimmermanJAWebblllEBHoytJJ, et al. Calculation of stress in atomistic simulation. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng2004; 12(4): S319.
22.
LutskoJF.Generalized expressions for the calculation of elastic constants by computer simulation. J Appl Phys1989; 65(8): 2991–2997.
23.
JiangHHuangYHwangKC.A finite-temperature continuum theory based on interatomic potentials. J Eng Mater Technol2005; 127(4): 408–416.
24.
TangZZhaoHLiG, et al. (2006). Finite-temperature quasicontinuum method for multiscale analysis of silicon nanostructures. Phys Rev B74(6): 064110.
25.
ZhaoHBianLPanJ.A temperature related study on bifurcation strain and force of carbon nanotubes. Comput Mater Sci2015; 109: 129–136.
26.
IijimaSBrabecCMaitiA, et al. Structural flexibility of carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys1996; 104(5): 2089–2092.
27.
ZhangCLShenHS.Buckling and postbuckling analysis of single-walled carbon nanotubes in thermal environments via molecular dynamics simulation. Carbon2006; 44(13): 2608–2616.
NikiforovIZhangDBJamesRD, et al. Wavelike rippling in multiwalled carbon nanotubes under pure bending. Appl Phys Lett2010; 96(12): 123107.
31.
HakobyanYTadmorEBJamesRD.Objective quasicontinuum approach for rod problems. Phys Rev B2012; 86(24): 245435.
32.
WangCGLiuYPAl-GhalithJ, et al. Buckling behavior of carbon nanotubes under bending: From ripple to kink. Carbon2016; 102: 224–235.
33.
CaiWFongWElsenE, et al. Torsion and bending periodic boundary conditions for modeling the intrinsic strength of nanowires. J Mech Phys Solids2008; 56(11): 3242–3258.
34.
ZhouM.A new look at the atomic level virial stress: On continuum–molecular system equivalence. Proc R Soc London, Ser A2003; 459(2037): 2347–2392.
35.
ZhangYYWangCMTanVBC. Buckling of carbon nanotubes at high temperatures. Nanotechnology2009; 20(21): 215702.
36.
ZhangCLShenHS.Buckling and postbuckling of single-walled carbon nanotubes under combined axial compression and torsion in thermal environments. Phys Rev B2007; 75(4): 045408.
37.
GhatakADasAL.Kink instability of a highly deformable elastic cylinder. Phys Rev Lett2007; 99(7): 076101.
