This article expands the research on the Internet as a tool in election campaigning beyond the U.S. context. With regard to Web campaigning, the Nordic countries, including Finland, stand out as being of special interest, since they have a world lead in Internet users per capita. Empirically, the candidates' Web sites in the 1999 Finnish parliamentary election campaign are analyzed. First, the characteristics of the Web candidates (n = 1,046) are scrutinized. More often than not, the Web candidates are incumbents, female, and rather young. Second, a random sample of sites is analyzed. The sites generally resemble traditional campaign material and rarely include real interactive features. Thus, as has also been observed in studies of U.S. Web campaigns, the candidates rely on the downward dissemination of conventional and positive campaign messages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altheide, David L. , and Robert P. Snow. 1992. Media Worlds in the Postjournalism Era. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
2.
Asp, Kent , and Peter Esaiasson. 1996. “The Modernization of Swedish Campaigns: Individualization, Professionalization, and Medialization.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, ed. David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini. Westport, CT: Praeger.
3.
Blumler, Jay G. , and Michael Gurevitch. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
4.
Djupsund, Göran , and Lars Svåsand, eds. 1990. Partiorganisationer: Studier i strukturer og processer i finske, norske og svenske partier (Party Organizations: Studies in Structures and Processes in Finnish, Norwegian, and Swedish Parties). Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.
5.
Dulio, David A. , Donald L. Goff, and James A. Thurber. 1999. “Untangled Web: Internet Use during the 1998 Election.”PS: Political Science & Politics32(1):53-59.
6.
Farrell, David M. 1996. “Campaign Strategies and Tactics.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. Lawrence Leduc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Faucheaux, Ron . 1998. “How Campaigns Are Using the Internet: An Exclusive Nationwide Survey.”Campaigns & Elections19(9):22-25.
8.
Gibson, Rachel , and Stephen J. Ward. 1998. “U. K. Political Parties and the Internet: `Politics as Usual' in the New Media?”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics3(3):14-38.
9.
Holsti, Ole R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Humphreys, Peter J. 1996. Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
11.
Isotalus, Pekka . 1998. “Euroehdokkaat kotisivuillaan” (The Eurocandidates on their Homepages). In Kaveri vai peluri. Poliitikko mediassa, ed. Pekka Isotalus. Jyväskylä: Atena.
12.
Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla . 1999. “Campaigning on the Internet in the Elections of 1998.” In Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World, ed. Elaine Ciulla Kamarck and Joseph S. Nye, Jr.Hollis, NH: Hollis.
13.
Katz, Richard S. , and Peter Mair, eds. 1994. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaption in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
14.
Klotz, Robert . 1998. “Virtual Criticism: Negative Advertising on the Internet in the 1996 Senate Races.”Political Communication15(3):347-365.
15.
Margolis, Michael , David Resnick, and Chin-Chang Tu. 1997. “Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and Candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 Primary Season.”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics2(1):59-78.
16.
Margolis, Michael , David Resnick, and Joel D. Wolfe. 1999. “Party Competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain.”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics4(4):24-47.
17.
Noble, Phil . 1996. “Net the Vote.”Campaigns & Elections17(7):27-28.
18.
Norris, Pippa . 1999. “Who Surfs? New Technology, Old Voters and Virtual Democracy.” In Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World, ed. Elaine Ciulla Kamarck and Joseph S. Nye, Jr.Hollis, NH: Hollis.
19.
Norris, Pippa . 2000. “The Internet in Europe: A New North-South Divide?”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5(1):1-12.
20.
Roper, Juliet . 1998. “New Zealand Political Parties Online: The World Wide Web as a Tool for Democratization or for Political Marketing?” In The Politics of Cyberspace, ed. Chris Toulouse and Timothy W. Luke. London: Routledge.
21.
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer . 1998. “The Web as a Window on Campaigns: Candidates Offer Polls and Adwatches; Press Offer Issue Information.” On-line report from the Campaign Quality Project at the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania. Available at http://appcpenn.org/appc/reports//webaswindow.pdf.
22.
Sundberg, Jan , and Stefan Högnabba. 1992. “Finland: The 1991 Campaign.” In Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing, ed. Shaun Bowler and David M. Farrell. New York: St Martin's Press.
23.
Swanson, David L. , and Paolo Mancini, eds. 1996. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
24.
Tedesco, John C. , Jerry L. Miller, and Julia A. Spiker. 1999. “Presidential Campaigning on the Information Superhighway: An Exploration of Content and Form.” In The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign Communication, ed. Lynda L. Kaid and Dianne G. Bystrom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Trent, Judith S. , and Robert V. Friedenberg. 1991. Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices. 2nd Edition. New York: Praeger.
26.
Vaalirahoituskomitea . 1999. Vaalirahoituskomitean mietintö (Report of the Election Campaign Financing Committee). Helsinki: Ministry of Justice.
27.
Whillock, Rita K. 1998. “Digital Democracy: The '96 Presidential Campaign On-Line.” In The 1996 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective, ed. Robert E. Denton. Westport, CT: Praeger.
