Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries in US trail sports are understudied as trail sport popularity grows. This study describes MSK injury patterns among hikers, trail runners, and mountain bikers from 2002 through 2021 and investigates MSK injury trends acquired during mountain sports.

Methods

The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to identify US emergency department (ED) patients from 2002-2021 (inclusive) who endured MSK injuries during hiking, trail running, or mountain biking. Injury rates and national estimates were calculated across demographics.

Results

9835 injuries were included (48.4% male, 51.6% female). Injuries increased over time, with 1213 from 2002-2005 versus 2417 from 2018-2021. No sex differences existed before 2010, after which female injury rates exceeded those of males. The following findings were statistically significant, with P<0.05: females endured more fractures and strains/sprains; males endured more lacerations; concussions and head injuries were higher among those <18 y; dislocations and strains/sprains were higher for 18 to 65 y; fractures were higher for >65 y; <18 y had high mountain-biking and low running rates; 18 to 65 y had high running rates; and >65 y had low biking and running rates. Although all diagnoses increased in number over time, no significant differences existed in the proportion of any given diagnosis relative to total injuries.

Conclusions

MSK injuries during trail sports have increased since 2002. Males endured more injuries until 2009, after which females endured more. Significant sex and age differences were found regarding injury diagnosis and body parts. Further studies are needed to confirm these trends and their causes.

Keywords

hiking running biking sports medicine trauma

Introduction

Trail sports are popular sources of recreational activity, with participation increasing over the past 2 decades.^1–3 More than half of the US population participates in outdoor activities, and the US National Park Service saw a nearly 20% rise in annual recreation visits over the past 15 y.^4–6

With trail-sport participation comes injury risk. One study found that 5.2 per 100 000 Yellowstone visitors were injured between 2003 and 2004.⁷ Although studies have reported mortality rates among summer mountain sports⁸ and injury patterns for specific trail activities (eg, hiking) or locations,⁹ literature is lacking regarding musculoskeletal-specific (MSK-specific) injury patterns across various summer mountain and trail sports throughout the United States.

The aim of this study was to describe MSK injury patterns and prevalence in the United States due to hiking, trail running, or mountain biking (herein referred to as “trail sports”). Given that NEISS is limited to the past 2 decades, we included all available data from 2002 to 2021.

Methods

Data source

We retrospectively reviewed the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database from the US Consumer Product Safety Commission. NEISS collects and reports data on injuries related to consumer products. 100 hospitals across the United States contribute data, serving as a representative sample of all US hospitals with emergency departments (EDs).^10,11 Limitations of NEISS include time constraints to only the preceding 2 decades, possibility that the selected sample and its national estimates do not accurately represent national data, and limited product codes under which to categorize injuries, which could lead to inconsistent injury categorizations.¹²

Reported parameters include age, sex (male, female, nonbinary/other), race, Hispanic ethnicity status, injured body part and diagnosis, injury location, fire involvement, use of substances surrounding incident, product code, narrative description, and statistical weight for national estimates. Existing studies have used NEISS to describe activity-specific injury patterns and report epidemiological trends among US EDs.^13–19 Specifics regarding the source of NEISS data and updates are available through the US Consumer Product Safety Commission website.¹⁰

Because this database includes publicly accessible, de-identified data that are freely published through a government website, this study was exempt from review through the institutional review board.

Data extraction

We first filtered data by diagnosis code (ie, injury type). Included codes were 50 (amputation), 52 (concussion), 53 (contusions, abrasions), 54 (crushing), 55 (dislocation), 57 (fracture), 59 (laceration), 61 (nerve damage), 63 (puncture), and 64 (strain, sprain).

To narrow the sample to trail sports, we filtered by the following product codes: exercise without equipment (code 3299); and two-wheeled, powered, off-road equipment (code 5036).²⁰ We applied a formula in Microsoft Excel (Version 16.59, Microsoft, Redmond, WA) to search narratives for terms related to “hiking,” “running,” “jogging,” or “biking” that co-occurred with “mountain” or “trail.” This formula included wildcards to control for misspellings and reduce missed data. Narratives that included terms related to biking, running, or jogging with no mention of “trail” or “mountain” were excluded.

This process was repeated for each annual report from 2002 to 2021. Data were organized into the following subgroups: year (2002-2005, 2006-2009, 2010-2013, 2014-2017, 2018-2021), activity (hiking, running, biking), sex (male, female; no nonbinary/other data), and age (<18 y, 18-65 y, >65 y).

Statistical analysis

Analyses were based on previous published studies that used NEISS.²¹ The svyset Stata function (SE 17.0, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX) was used to calculate national estimates, 95% confidence intervals, and adjusted Wald tests with weighted survey data. Data were present in weighted calculations, and subpopulation analyses were used to compare observations.²²

Results

Only statistically significant (P<0.05) results are reported.

Characteristics by sex

9835 total injuries were included (4725 [48.4%] males, 5110 [51.5%] females). From this sample, the national estimate was 1,146,630 total MSK injuries attributable to trail sports. Injuries increased over time, from 1213 in 2002-2005 versus 2417 by 2018-2021. Females had higher injury rates from 2010-2013, 2014-2017, and 2018-2021, with no sex difference before 2010 (Table 1, Figure 1). Female injury rates were higher than those of males in the 18-65 y and >65 y groups, with no sex difference in the <18 y group. Among Whites and American Indian/Alaskan Natives, females had higher injury rates. Females also had higher injury rates among the ethnicity subgroup “Not Hispanic” (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Total number of MSK trail sport injuries presented to US EDs by sex, 2002-2021.

Table 1.

Demographics.

Category		Male (n=4725, 48.4%)			Female (n=5110, 51.6%)
Category		National estimates (N)	Observations (n)	%	National estimates (N)	Observations (n)	%	P value^*
Years	2002-2005	76 183	666	54.1	64 630	547	45.9	0.66
	2006-2009	86 985	774	52.6	78 294	698	47.4	0.84
	2010-2013	98 775	896	49.0	102 943	942	51.0	0.05
	2014-2017	117 109	1042	45.3	141 340	1212	54.7	<0.01
	2018-2021	135 608	1064	44.1	172 085	1353	55.9	<0.01
Age range (y)	<18	101 773	818	58.1	73 531	583	42.0	0.08
	18-65	358 651	3213	45.8	425 190	3712	54.2	<0.01
	>65	54 236	411	47.2	60 571	457	52.8	<0.01
Race	Not stated in ED record	107 880	1194	48.6	114 032	1247	51.4	0.13
	White	372 434	2892	48.1	401 493	3068	51.9	<0.01
	Black/ African American	9128	87	46.2	10 610	108	53.8	0.16
	Other	18 406	191	44.7	22 794	230	55.3	0.08
	Asian	5700	67	43.9	7278	75	56.1	0.25
	American Indian/ Alaska Native	694	8	20.8	2644	21	79.2	<0.01
	Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander	418	3	48.7	441	3	51.3	0.82
Ethnicity	Not reported	15 208	125	42.8	20 346	156	57.2	0.03
	Hispanic, Latino/ Latina, or of Spanish origin	6258	61	42.0	8645	96	58.0	0.17
	Not Hispanic	79 488	619	43.3	104 182	813	56.7	<0.01

P value significance is defined as <0.05.

Outdoor activity participation exhibited racial disparities, with 72% of participants identifying as White in 2021.²³ Therefore, observed sex differences may not accurately represent female injury trends for underrepresented groups.

Injury patterns

Trail running had a higher rate of injuries from 2002-2005 compared to its nationally estimated proportion of total injuries. Mountain biking accounted for a lower proportion of injuries from 2014-2017 and 2018-2021, as did hiking from 2014-2017 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Total number of injuries by activity type over time.

Years	Mountain biking			Hiking			Trail running
Years	N (%)^†	n (%)^‡	P value^§	N (%)	n (%)	P value	N (%)	n (%)	P value	Totals (n)
2002-2005	22 797 (16.2%)	169 (13.9%)	0.26	116 647 (82.8%)	1028 (84.7%)	0.31	1369 (1.0%)	16 (1.3%)	<0.01	1213
2006-2009	16 769 (10.1%)	121 (8.2%)	0.36	145 026 (87.7%)	1311 (89.1%)	0.39	3484 (2.1%)	40 (2.7%)	0.99	1472
2010-2013	7923 (3.9%)	52 (2.8%)	0.12	189 475 (93.9%)	1717 (93.4%)	0.20	4320 (2.1%)	69 (3.8%)	0.96	1838
2014-2017	7893 (3.1%)	59 (2.6%)	<0.01	245 011 (94.8%)	2120 (94.1%)	<0.01	5545 (2.1%)	75 (3.3%)	0.95	2254
2018-2021	10 152 (3.3%)	59 (2.4%)	0.02	289 563 (94.1%)	2284 (94.5%)	0.11	7978 (2.6%)	74 (3.1%)	0.33	2417
Totals (n, %)	460, 5.0%	8,460, 92.0%	274, 3.0%	9,194, 100.0%

^†

N (%): National estimates (number and % of population)

^‡

n: Observations

^§

P value significance is defined as <0.05.

Males were more likely to endure shoulder, upper trunk, and hand injuries, whereas females were more likely to endure elbow, wrist, knee, lower leg, or ankle injuries. Females were more likely to sustain strain/sprains and fractures, whereas males were more likely to sustain lacerations. Females were also more likely than males to be treated, examined, and released versus admitted or transferred to a higher level of care (Table 3).

Table 3.

Injury characteristics by sex.

Category		Male			Female
Category		N^**	n^††	%	N	n	%	P value^‡‡
Body part	Shoulder	27 431	234	66.6	13 730	118	33.4	<0.01
	Upper trunk	28 277	251	62.9	16 668	150	37.1	<0.01
	Elbow	9887	85	41.2	14 090	120	58.8	0.03
	Lower arm	19 368	158	45.9	22 835	162	54.1	0.24
	Wrist	20 113	175	30.3	46 263	380	69.7	<0.01
	Knee	57 238	468	45.9	67 592	544	54.1	0.02
	Lower leg	42 609	387	46.5	49 030	424	53.5	0.02
	Ankle	99 641	904	38.9	156 389	1388	61.1	<0.01
	Pubic region	345	3	34.0	670	5	66.0	N.D.^§§
	Head	29 606	238	57.4	21 945	177	42.6	0.07
	Face	33 847	286	54.2	28 636	236	45.8	0.38
	Lower trunk	31 482	286	50.3	31 143	277	49.7	0.51
	Upper arm	4474	39	40.5	6583	56	59.5	0.11
	Upper leg	8663	80	60.6	5640	52	39.4	0.08
	Hand	20 950	166	61.0	13 378	102	39.0	<0.01
	Foot	33 874	290	51.7	31 669	284	48.3	0.85
	Not Stated/Unk	67	3	8.4	731	7	91.6	N.D.
	Neck	4882	53	55.1	3973	34	44.9	0.78
	Finger	23 388	188	61.1	14 886	119	38.9	0.13
	Toe	6270	55	56.8	4769	47	43.2	0.84
Diagnosis	Amputation	115	1	70.6	48	1	29.4	N.D.
	Concussions	12 199	109	52.6	10 995	94	47.4	0.53
	Contusions, abrasions	79 371	660	51.9	73 432	619	48.1	0.18
	Crushing	1137	8	69.0	512	3	31.0	N.D.
	Dislocation	19 967	173	62.5	11 968	96	37.5	0.15
	Fracture	139 605	1220	44.4	175 132	1501	55.6	<0.01
	Laceration	95 597	758	59.1	66 260	534	40.9	0.04
	Nerve damage	2393	20	46.2	2788	30	53.8	0.40
	Puncture	6304	64	51.8	5862	44	48.2	0.41
	Strain, sprain	157 972	1429	42.7	212 295	1830	57.3	<0.01
Disposition	Treated/ Examined and released	475 899	4031	47.4	528 229	4432	52.6	<0.01
	Treated and transferred	5724	36	60.0	3820	23	40.0	0.29
	Treated and admitted/ hospitalized	28 845	331	54.1	24 461	265	45.9	0.45
	Held for observation	2769	26	57.7	2034	25	42.3	0.40
	Left without being seen	1192	17	61.4	748	7	38.6	0.49
	Unknown, not stated	231	1	100.0	0	0	0	N.D.

^**

N: National estimates

^††

n: Observations

^‡‡

P value significance is defined as <0.05.

^§§

N.D.: CPSC considers this national estimate unstable and potentially unreliable because the estimate is fewer than 1200, the number of records used is fewer than 20, or the coefficient of variation exceeds 33%. Therefore, no statistical data are provided.

The >65 y group comprised a lower proportion of the injured cohort than expected from 2002-2005 and 2006-2009, whereas the 18-65 y group had a higher proportion from 2006-2009. Among females, the <18 y group comprised a lower proportion of the injured cohort than expected, whereas the 18-65 y group had higher than expected rates (Table 4).

Table 4.

Characteristics and injury patterns by age.

Category		<18 y(% N^***=16.2%, n=1489)			18-65 y(% N=72.8%, n=7383)			>65 y(% N=11.0%, n= 963)
Category		N (%)^†††	n^‡‡‡ (%)	P value^§§§	N (%)	n (%)	P value	N (%)	n (%)	P value
Years	2002-2005	33 075 (23.5%)	262 (21.6%)	0.36	98 924 (70.3%)	885 (73.0%)	0.70	8814 (6.3%)	66 (5.4%)	<0.01
	2006-2009	27 938 (16.9%)	227 (15.4%)	0.77	125 930 (76.2%)	1147 (77.9%)	0.04	11 411 (6.9%)	98 (6.7%)	<0.01
	2010-2013	33 192 (16.5%)	268 (14.6%)	0.92	150 556 (74.6%)	1425 (77.5%)	0.28	17 970 (8.9%)	145 (7.9%)	0.17
	2014-2017	39 445 (15.3%)	312 (13.8%)	0.49	186 639 (72.2%)	1713 (76.0%)	0.73	32 365 (12.5%)	229 (10.2%)	0.38
	2018-2021	41 654 (13.5%)	332 (13.7%)	0.14	221 792 (72.1%)	1755 (72.6%)	0.71	44 247 (14.4%)	330 (13.7%)	0.12
Sex	Male	101 773 (19.8%)	818 (18.4%)	0.19	358 651 (69.7%)	3213 (72.3%)	0.18	54 236 (10.5%)	411 (9.3%)	0.92
Sex	Female	73 531 (13.1%)	583 (12.3%)	<0.01	425 190 (76.0%)	3712 (78.1%)	0.01	60 571 (10.8%)	457 (9.6%)	0.90
Body part	Shoulder	5549 (13.5%)	40 (11.4%)	0.48	31 493 (76.5%)	281 (79.8%)	0.36	4119 (10.0%)	31 (8.9%)	0.79
	Upper trunk	3248 (7.2%)	26 (6.5%)	<0.01	35 166 (78.2%)	315 (78.6%)	0.13	6531 (14.5%)	60 (15.0%)	0.16
	Elbow	4059 (16.9%)	38 (18.5%)	0.85	16 605 (69.3%)	144 (70.2%)	0.37	3313 (13.8%)	23 (11.2%)	0.21
	Lower arm	10 117 (24.0%)	81 (25.3%)	0.17	26 836 (63.6%)	202 (63.1%)	0.12	5250 (12.4%)	37 (11.6%)	0.59
	Wrist	10 580 (15.9%)	84 (15.1%)	0.87	47 092 (70.9%)	395 (71.2%)	0.40	8704 (13.1%)	76 (13.7%)	0.24
	Knee	20 820 (16.7%)	153 (15.1%)	0.86	94 948 (76.1%)	798 (78.9%)	0.13	9062 (7.3%)	61 (6.0%)	<0.01
	Lower leg	11 904 (13.0%)	101 (12.5%)	0.22	69 425 (75.8%)	630 (77.7%)	0.28	10 310 (11.3%)	80 (9.9%)	0.79
	Ankle	36 188 (14.1%)	294 (12.8%)	0.10	204 690 (79.9%)	1886 (82.3%)	<0.01	15 152 (5.9%)	112 (4.9%)	<0.01
	Head	14 698 (28.5%)	123 (29.6%)	<0.01	28 855 (56.0%)	238 (57.3%)	<0.01	7998 (15.5%)	54 (13.0%)	0.04
	Lower trunk	6062 (9.7%)	48 (8.5%)	<0.01	49 818 (79.5%)	464 (82.4%)	0.02	6745 (10.8%)	51 (9.1%)	0.97
	Upper arm	1301 (11.8%)	9 (9.5%)	0.29	6355 (57.5%)	58 (61.1%)	0.01	3401 (30.8%)	28 (29.5%)	<0.01
	Upper leg	4912 (34.3%)	36 (27.3%)	<0.01	7810 (54.6%)	79 (59.8%)	<0.01	1581 (11.1%)	17 (12.9%)	0.91
	Hand	6341 (18.5%)	48 (17.9%)	0.49	23 446 (68.3%)	190 (70.9%)	0.36	4541 (13.2%)	30 (11.2%)	0.60
	Foot	8381 (12.8%)	68 (11.8%)	0.13	54 218 (82.7%)	483 (84.1%)	<0.01	2944 (4.5%)	23 (4.0%)	<0.01
	Neck	1640 (18.5%)	13 (14.9%)	0.72	5911 (66.8%)	60 (69.0%)	0.31	1304 (14.7%)	14 (16.1%)	0.37
	Finger	6787 (17.7%)	50 (16.3%)	0.63	25 450 (66.5%)	215 (70.0%)	0.18	6037 (15.8%)	42 (13.7%)	0.19
	Toe	1978 (17.9%)	18 (17.6%)	0.74	8810 (79.8%)	83 (81.4%)	0.14	251 (2.3%)	1 (1.0%)	<0.01
Diagnosis	Amputation	115 (70.6%)	1 (50.0%)	0.07	48 (29.4%)	1 (50.0%)	0.14	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	N.D.^****
	Concussion	7305 (31.5%)	63 (31.0%)	<0.01	13 784 (59.4%)	125 (61.6%)	0.03	2105 (9.1%)	15 (7.4%)	0.54
	Contusions, abrasions	26 841 (17.6%)	216 (16.9%)	0.66	109 306 (71.5%)	942 (73.7%)	0.60	16 656 (10.9%)	121 (9.5%)	0.91
	Crushing	141 (8.6%)	2 (18.2%)	0.35	1253 (76.0%)	8 (72.7%)	0.85	255 (15.5%)	1 (9.1%)	0.74
	Dislocation	2006 (6.3%)	21 (7.8%)	<0.01	25 806 (80.8%)	214 (79.6%)	<0.01	4123 (12.9%)	34 (12.6%)	0.28
	Fracture	40 705 (12.9%)	332 (12.2%)	0.18	227 352 (72.2%)	2024 (74.4%)	0.77	46 680 (14.8%)	365 (13.4%)	0.01
	Laceration	44 094 (27.2%)	338 (26.2%)	<0.01	93 409 (57.7%)	780 (60.4%)	<0.01	24 354 (15.0%)	174 (13.5%)	0.02
	Nerve damage	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	N.D.	4030 (77.8%)	42 (84.0%)	0.53	1151 (22.2%)	8 (16.0%)	0.13
	Puncture	2038 (16.8%)	19 (17.6%)	0.93	9121 (75.0%)	84 (77.8%)	0.74	1007 (8.3%)	5 (4.6%)	0.50
	Strain, sprain	52 059 (14.1%)	409 (12.5%)	0.05	299 732 (81.0%)	2705 (83.0%)	<0.01	18 476 (5.0%)	145 (4.4%)	<0.01
Activity Type	Biking	32 014 (48.9%)	228 (49.6%)	0.01	32 766 (50.0%)	227 (49.3%)	0.06	754 (1.2%)	5 (1.1%)	<0.01
	Hiking	140 897 (14.3%)	1152 (13.6%)	0.08	731 597 (74.2%)	6456 (76.3%)	0.39	113 228 (11.5%)	852 (10.1%)	0.54
	Running	2393 (10.5%)	21 (7.7%)	0.03	19 478 (85.8%)	242 (88.3%)	<0.01	825 (3.6%)	11 (4.0%)	<0.01

^***

% N: Nationally estimated proportion of total population accounted for by given cohort

^†††

N (%): National estimates (number and % of population)

^‡‡‡

n: Observations

^§§§

P value significance is defined as <0.05.

^****

The <18 y group had low rates of upper trunk and lower trunk injuries, whereas they had high rates of head and upper leg injuries. Those 18-65 y had low head, upper arm, and upper leg injury rates, whereas they had high rates of ankle, foot, and lower trunk injuries. The >65 y group had low rates of knee, ankle, foot, and toe injuries, versus high head and upper arm injury rates (Table 4).

Those <18 y had high rates of concussions and lacerations, versus low rates of dislocations. The 18-65 y age group had a high rate of dislocations and strains/sprains, versus low rates of concussions and lacerations. The >65 y age group had high rates of fractures and lacerations, versus low rates of strains/sprains. Regarding activity type, biking participation rates among those <18 y were higher than expected, whereas running participation rates were lower than expected. For those 18-65 y, running participation rates were higher than expected. Biking and running participation rates for those >65 y were lower than expected (Table 4).

Although all injury diagnoses increased over time, the proportion of injuries accounted for by one diagnosis did not change significantly (Table 5).

Table 5.

Total number of injuries by diagnosis over time.

	2002-2005		2006-2009		2010-2013		2014-2017		2018-2021
	n^††††	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	P value^‡‡‡‡
Amputation	0	0.0	115	0.1	48	0.0	0	0.0	0	0.0	N.D.^§§§§
Concussions	2950	2.1	2717	1.6	5468	2.7	4862	1.9	7197	2.3	0.72
Contusions, abrasions	22 872	16.2	22 363	13.5	26 887	13.3	37 301	14.4	43 380	14.1	0.21
Crushing	341	0.2	311	0.2	204	0.1	82	0.0	711	0.2	N.D.
Dislocation	2143	1.5	4496	2.7	7625	3.8	6299	2.4	11 372	3.7	N.D.
Fracture	40 235	28.6	47 697	28.9	56 035	27.8	73 556	28.5	97 214	31.6	0.27
Laceration	22 402	15.9	23 468	14.2	30 935	15.3	40 873	15.8	44 179	14.4	0.35
Nerve Damage	161	0.1	15	0.0	456	0.2	2436	0.9	2113	0.7	N.D.
Puncture	1442	1.0	2251	1.4	1672	0.8	3641	1.4	3160	1.0	N.D.
Strain, sprain	48 267	34.3	61 846	37.4	72 388	35.9	89 399	34.6	98 367	32.0	0.53

^††††

n: Observations

^‡‡‡‡

P value reflects whether there is a significant difference in percentages between the first-year group (2002-2005) and the last-year group (2018-2021).

^§§§§

Discussion

Total MSK injuries endured during trail sports and presented to US EDs increased from 2002-2021. “Injury rates” refers to the observed number of a given diagnosis, injured body part, patient age, or patient sex relative to the total number of injuries included from NEISS. Males made up a larger proportion of injuries from 2002-2009, then females did from 2010 onward. The increase in total injuries paralleled the rising popularity of trail activities. Among females, outdoor activity participation increased by about 20 million participants from 2015-2021, surpassing the increase among male participants by about 1 million.²³ One explanation for the rise in female injury rates from 2010 onward is that as female trail-sport participation increased, the larger sample size revealed underlying trends in female injury patterns. For instance, Zech et al found that female athletes have slightly higher injury rates compared to male athletes, possibly due to such factors as anatomical hip angle, joint laxity, or muscle mass.²¹ Studies have also found that males are less likely than females to present to a doctor when they experience injury or illness.^24,25 Females have also been found to be more likely to present to a doctor for injury, providing a possible explanation why the proportion of ED-presenting injuries accounted for by females grew as female trail-sport participation increased. When stratified by age, females had higher injury rates than did males among all age groups except those <18 y. Other studies noted similar findings, with the proportion of female-to-male injuries increasing as age increased. These data suggest that gender differences in injury rates may become more magnified as age increases, but why this growth occurs remains uncertain.²⁶

Those <18 y had higher rates of head injuries and concussions. Although the difference between observed and expected rates was only 0.5%, this number remains significant, considering the long-term impact that chronic traumatic encephalopathy and mild, especially repetitive, traumatic brain injuries can have on youth.^27–30 Given the higher risk-taking propensity of younger age groups,³¹ greater concussion rates among those under 18 y may be expected. An important consideration in a leisure sport, such as mountain biking, versus other common youth sports where concussions are common, such as football and hockey, is the lack of official safety regulations, such as helmet-wearing.^32,33 Given that mountain-biking rates were higher than expected for those <18 y, advocating for concussion-prevention education and helmets for bikers could be an area for intervention to minimize adverse outcomes.³⁴

Higher fracture rates among those >65 y were expected, considering the decline in bone-mineral density and greater fracture risk with age. A potential area for intervention to mitigate injury in this population includes strength and resistance training, which bolsters bone-mineral density and skeletal health.^35,36

Small but statistically significant differences in reported injury rates versus national estimates were found for mountain biking from 2014-2017 and 2018-2021 (lower than expected), hiking from 2014-2017 (lower than expected), and trail running from 2002-2005 (higher than expected). However, all differences were <1% and thus were likely not clinically significant when considering expected-versus-actual injury risk for a particular trail sport.

Although three body parts (shoulder, upper trunk, hand) were more commonly injured in males, five body parts (elbow, wrist, knee, lower leg, ankle) were more likely injured in females. Females were more likely to endure strains/sprains or fractures compared to males. A suggested explanation for higher female fracture rates is that for a given bone density, females are more likely to experience fractures.³⁷ Kudlacek et al found that females had a 3x greater risk of vertebral fractures compared to males with the same bone-mineral density.³⁷ Preventative measures, such as high-intensity resistance and strength training, could be valuable interventions, especially for female trail-sport participants.^24,29,31,34

Those >65 y had low injury rates from 2002-2005 and 2006-2009. Activities with arguably higher injury potential (mountain biking, trail running) saw low participation among the >65 y group compared to other ages. However, these differences were all <1% and may be of limited clinical significance. The 18-65 y group, however, did have high injury rates from 2006-2009. Similar to other studies that found declining risk-taking behavior with increasing age, this result could suggest that those in the 18-65 y group chose riskier and more injury-prone activities, whereas the >65 y group took greater precautions when approaching trail activities.³⁸ Regardless, higher injury rates among those 18-65 y suggest that education and safety training may be of particular benefit for this group.

Given the increase in total trail-sport injuries over time, the question arose regarding whether the distribution of diagnoses also changed. However, when comparing 2002-2005 to 2018-2021, no differences were found in the proportion of any one diagnosis contributing to total injuries.

Although a large national database was used to examine trends across various demographics for this study, it does have limitations. NEISS provides national estimates from its sample data, but they come from EDs only, most of which are nonpediatric. Only eight children's hospitals contribute data to NEISS.¹¹ Although <5% of all US hospitals are children's hospitals, they see about 15% of all sick or injured children and account for about 40% of pediatric hospital admissions.^39,40 Thus, conclusions for the <18 y group may lack robustness due to under-representation of pediatric data.

NEISS also represents only injuries that presented at EDs. Given that many injuries are managed outside EDs, such as self-management or urgent cares, this missing information may compromise accurate representation of all injuries endured during trail sports. Although many sports-specific studies have reported results relative to participation hours, NEISS does not record this component, and thus injury rates are not adjusted for participation hours.

To examine injuries related to trail sports, a formula was used in Excel to filter narrative sections by inclusion terms and common misspellings. It is possible that other misspellings or terms were used to reference these activities and not included in the formula. There was also conflation of “mountain biking” as using a mountain bike regardless of location, versus using one in mountain sports. The analysis here was limited to narratives that separately defined the location as mountain-related and the method of transport as a bike, although this guideline may have excluded narratives that intended to describe mountain sport biking but simply included “mountain biking,” leading to less mountain biker representation in this analysis.

Conclusion

As participation in trail sports increased from 2002-2021, US EDs also saw an increase in the number of MSK injuries sustained from these sports. Total injuries increased from 2002-2021. Males made up a greater proportion of the injured cohort from 2002-2009, versus females from 2010 onward. Injury patterns, such as more frequent head injuries and concussions among those <18 y and higher fracture rates among those >65 y, highlight potential areas for intervention and injury prevention.

Footnotes

Author Contribution(s)

Madeline M. Owen: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Connor D. Workman: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Hunter S. Angileri: Data curation; Writing – review & editing.

Michael A. Terry: Writing – review & editing.

Vehniah K. Tjong: Conceptualization; Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Krau

. Summer activities: incidents and accidents. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2013;25(2):287–295.

Morse

Gladkikh

Hackenburg

Gould

. COVID-19 and human-nature relationships: Vermonters’ activities in nature and associated nonmaterial values during the pandemic. PloS One. 2020;15(12):e0243697.

Viljoen

Janse van Rensburg

DCC

van Mechelen

, Verhagen E, Silva B, Scheer V, et al. Trail running injury risk factors: a living systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(10):577–587.

2023 Outdoor Participation Trends Report. [Internet]. Outdoor Industry Association; 2023. https://outdoorindustry.org/resource/2023-outdoor-participation-trends-report/#:~:text=Here%27s%20a%20sneak%20preview%20of,population%20ages%20six%20and%20older

National Park Service statistical abstract 2002 [Internet]. National Park Service Public Use Statistics Office; 2002. https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/455287

National Park Service statistical abstract 2016 [Internet]. National Park Service Public Use Statistics Office; 2016. https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/568076

Johnson

Huettl

Kocsis

Chan

Kordick

. Injuries sustained at Yellowstone National Park requiring emergency medical system activation. Wilderness Environ Med. 2007;18(3):186–189.

Gatterer

Niedermeier

Pocecco

, Frühauf A, Faulhaber M, Menz V, et al. Mortality in different mountain sports activities primarily practiced in the summer season—a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(20):3920.

Boulware

Forgey

Martin

. Medical risks of wilderness hiking. Am J Med. 2003;114(4):288–293.

10.

NEISS frequently asked questions [Internet]. Cited November 4, 2022. https://www.cpsc.gov/Research-Statistics/NEISS-Injury-Data/Neiss-Frequently-Asked-Questions

11.

United States Consumer Product Safety Commission NEISS Hospitals 2018 [Internet]. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. Cited November 4, 2023. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/NEISS_Hospital_Map_2018.pdf?6gAfTlFla.YEZWTkBH5hF6zcHm.1eweZ

12.

US Consumer Product Safety Commission. National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) [Internet]. Cited November 4, 2022. https://www.cpsc.gov/Research-Statistics/NEISS-Injury-Data

13.

Boden

Isaacs

Ahmed

Anderson

. Epidemiology of exertional rhabdomyolysis in the United States: analysis of NEISS database 2000 to 2019. Phys Sportsmed. 2022;50(6):486–493.

14.

Brennan

Fish

Cohn

Othman

Stucker

Bundrick

. Golf-related craniofacial injuries in adults: a NEISS database study. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(4):1561–1564.

15.

Huffman

Jia

Pirruccio

Hecht

Parisien

. Acute vertebral fractures in skiing and snowboarding: a 20-year sex-specific analysis of national injury data. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(7):23259671221105486.

16.

Khan

Brown

. Recreational drone-related injuries in children: a review of national electronic injury surveillance system (NEISS) data. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15390.

17.

Lafferty

Pion

Cohn

Shokri

Ducic

Sokoya

. Rugby-related adult maxillofacial trauma injuries: a NEISS database study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;25(3):389–393.

18.

Muhonen

Kafle

Torabi

Abello

Bitner

Pham

. Surfing-related craniofacial injuries: a NEISS database study. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(8):2383–2387.

19.

Reich

Cohn

Othman

Shokri

Ducic

Sokoya

. Volleyball-related adult maxillofacial trauma injuries: a NEISS database study. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(4):1564–1567.

20.

NEISS Coding Manual [Internet]. CPSC NEISS; 2022. Cited November 4, 2022. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/January-2022-CPSC-Only-NT-NEISS-Coding-Manual.pdf?VersionId=KSUolSeeOpWoGAXtq0Zb_EVaHSiOdzFe

21.

Zech

Hollander

Junge

, Steib S, Groll A, Heiner J, et al. Sex differences in injury rates in team-sport athletes: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2022;11(1):104–114.

22.

Statista. Distribution of participants in outdoor activities in the United States from 2015 to 2021, by gender [internet]. Statista Research Department. 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/190118/outdoor-activities-participation-by-gender-in-the-us-2009/

23.

Outdoor Foundation. 2022 outdoor participation trends report [Internet]. Outdoor Foundation. Cited November 4, 2023. https://outdoorindustry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2022-Outdoor-Participation-Trends-Report-1.pdf

24.

Courtenay

. Behavioral factors associated with disease, injury, and death among men: evidence and implications for prevention. Int J Mens Health. 2002;1(3):281–342.

25.

Banks

. No man’s land: men, illness, and the NHS. BMJ. 2001;323(7320):1058–1060.

26.

Bolandparvaz

Yadollahi

Abbasi

Anvar

. Injury patterns among various age and gender groups of trauma patients in southern Iran: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(41):e7812.

27.

Kim

Seo

Lee

, Lee SH, Choi SH, Yoo R-E, et al. Reduced brainstem volume after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100(5):473–482.

28.

Koerte

Mayinger

Muehlmann

, Kaufman D, Lin AP, Steffinger D, et al. Cortical thinning in former professional soccer players. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016;10(3):792–798.

29.

Mez

Daneshvar

Kiernan

, Abdolmohammadi B, Alvarez VE, Huber BR, et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in players of American football. JAMA. 2017;318(4):360–370.

30.

Prien

Besuden

Junge

Feddermann-Demont

Brugger

Verhagen

. Cognitive ageing in top-level female soccer players compared to a normative sample from the general population: a cross-sectional study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020;26(7):645–653.

31.

Steinberg

. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008;28(1):78–106.

32.

Chrisman

SPD

Lowry

Herring

, Kroshus E, Hoopes TR, Higgins SK, et al. Concussion incidence, duration, and return to school and sport in 5- to 14-year-old American football athletes. J Pediatr. 2019;207:176–184.e1.

33.

Echlin

Tator

Cusimano

, Cantu RC, Taunton JE, Upshur REG, et al. A prospective study of physician-observed concussions during junior ice hockey: implications for incidence rates. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(5):E4.

34.

Dagher

Costa

Lamoureux

de Guise

Feyz

. Comparative outcomes of traumatic brain injury from biking accidents with or without helmet use. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(1):56–64.

35.

Mosti

Kaehler

Stunes

Hoff

Syversen

. Maximal strength training in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(10):2879–2886.

36.

Watson

Weeks

Weis

Harding

Horan

Beck

. High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density and physical function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis: the LIFTMOR randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):211–220.

37.

Kudlacek

Schneider

Resch

Freudenthaler

Willvonseder

. Gender differences in fracture risk and bone mineral density. Maturitas. 2000;36(3):173–180.

38.

Wilson

Sevi

Strough

Shook

. Age differences in risk taking: now you see them, now you don’t. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022;29(4):651–665.

39.

All children need children’s hospitals [Internet]. National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions. Cited November 5, 2023. https://www.upstate.edu/pediatrics/pdf/academics/allchildren.pdf

40.

Whitfill

Auerbach

Scherzer

Shi

Xiang

Stanley

. Emergency care for children in the United States: epidemiology and trends over time. J Emerg Med. 2018;55(3):423–434.

Musculoskeletal injuries during trail sports: Sex- and age-specific analyses over 20 years from a national injury database

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Data source

Data extraction

Statistical analysis

Results

Characteristics by sex

Injury patterns

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Author Contribution(s)

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References