Group Work and Electronic Meeting Systems: From Boardroom to Classroom

Abstract

In the business community, collaborative efforts of work teams have led to a dramatic increase in the number of group meetings. Business managers, seek ing more efficient and effective methods of managing diverse contributions, have increasingly used information technology to supportgroup work. The same need to improve group communication is relevant to today's classroom, where new technologies can transform the classroom from a traditional instructor-centered environment to a student-centered environment where stu dents actively participate in intellectual discourse. Results from field and labo ratory studies about business usage of electronic meeting systems (EMS) can be applied to the classroom setting. We offer an overview of available tools and suggest some classroom activities. EMS-supported courses provide many new opportunities to foster learning. Students participate, participate more equally, and report a highly satisfying experience.

Keywords

Electronic meetings EMS geographically dispersed teams GSS group work groupware

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), June, 159-174.

Amidon, E. J. , & Hough, J. B. (Eds.).(1967). Interaction analysis: Theory, research, and application. London: Addison-Wesley.

Auster, C.J. , & MacRone, M. (1994). The classroom as a negotiated social setting: An empirical study of the effects of faculty members' behaviour on students' participation. Teaching Sociology, 22, 289-300.

Balthazard, P. , & Romani, T. (1998). A comparison between synchronous and asynchronous computer discussions with traditional in-class discussions. Bryan School of Business and Economics Working Paper, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, March 1998.

Bergquist, W.H. , & Phillips, S.R. (1989). Leading discussions. In R. A. Neff , & M. Weimer (Eds.), Classroom communication: Collected readings for effective discussion and questioning (pp. 19-25). Madison, WI: Magna Publications, Inc.

Connolly, T. , Jessup, L.M. , & Valacich, J.S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36(6), 689-703.

Delamont, S. (1976). Interaction in the Classroom. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.

Dillon, J.T. (1994). Discussion in classrooms. Bristol, Pennsylvania: Open University Press.

Ewens, W. (1989). Teaching using discussion. In R. A. Neff & M. Weimer (Eds.), Classroom communication: Collected readings for effective discussion and questioning (pp. 96-101). Madison, WI: Magna Publications, Inc.

10.

Flanders, N.A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. MA: Addison-Wesley.

11.

Grohowski, R.B. , McGoff, C. , Vogel, D.R. , Martz, W.B. , & Nunamaker, J.F. (1990). Implementation of electronic meeting systems at IBM. MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 369-383.

12.

Hall, M. (1996). Schools learning the ABCs of the Web for kids, teachers. MacWEEK, 10(30), 85-87.

13.

Hawisher, G.E. , & Selfe, C.L. (1992). Voices in college classrooms: The dynamics of electronic discussion. The Quarterly, 14(3), 24-28.

14.

Karp, D. , & Yoels, W. (1976). The college classroom: Some observations on the meanings of student participation. Sociology and Social Research , 60(4), 421-439.

15.

McKeachie, W.J. (1978). Organizing effective discussion. Teaching Tips (7th ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.

16.

McKeachie, W.J. (1970). Research on college teaching: A review. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education .

17.

Mike, D.G. (1996). Internet in the schools: A literary perspective . Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40 (1), 4-13.

18.

Nunamaker, J.F. , Briggs, R.O. , Mittleman, D.O. , Vogel, D.R. , & Balthazard, P.A. (1997). Lessons from a dozen years of Group Support Systems Research: A discussion of lab and field findings . Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(3), Winter.

19.

Rogers, C.R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

20.

Tullar, W.L. , & Kaiser, P.R. (in press). Improving interviewer content validity by means of GSS . In R. Eder , & M. Harris , Eds., The employment interview (2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

21.

Walsh, K.R. , Briggs, R.O. , Ayoud, J. , Vanderboom, C. , & Glynn, M.S. (1996). Learning with GSS: A case study. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual HICSS Conference, Hawaii.