This study examined the effectiveness of conflict-generating
decision-making techniques in the college classroom. Utiliz
ing constructive conflict in classroom exercises may affect
decision-making quality and student reactions. This study
of undergraduate and graduate business students found
significant difference in both the quality of the decisions
and in student reactions to the techniques. The findings and
discussion indicate the potential for appropriate use of
structured decision-making techniques in the classroom.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Burnett, R.E. (1990). Benefits of collaborative planning in the business communication classroom. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 9-17.
2.
Daft, R.L., & Sharfman, M.P. (1990). Organization theory: Cases and applications. St. Paul, MN: West.
3.
Dorazio, P. (1985). Impressions of the technical writer: A master of many communication roles. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 48(2), 16-20.
4.
Ewald, R., & MacCallum, J. (1990). Promoting creative tension within collaborative writing groups. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 53(2), 23-26.
5.
Janis, I.L., & Mann L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict . New York: Free Press.
6.
Lunsford, A., & Ede, L. (1986). Why write... together: A research update. Rhetoric Review, 5(1), 71-81.
7.
Mason, R. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning management , Science, 15, 403-414.
Meyers, G.D. (1991). Thinking styles and the writing group. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 54(1), 17-20.
10.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
Murrell, A.J., Stewart, A.C., & Engel, B.T. (1993). Consensus versus devil's advocacy: The influence of decision process and task structure on strategic decision making. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 399-415.
12.
Porter, J.E. (1990). Ideology and collaboration in the classroom and in the corporation. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 18-22.
13.
Rieber, L.J. (1992). The role of cooperative writing in the business communication classroom. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 55(2), 32-34.
14.
Rothwell, J.D. (1992). In mixed company: Small group communication. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
15.
Schweiger, D.M., & Sandberg, W.R. (1989). The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 31-43.
16.
Van Gundy, A. (1984). Managing group creativity. New York: American Management Association. □
