As business organizations grow increasingly virtual, traditional principles of organizational communication require examination and modification. This article considers the curricular implications of the growing business uses of virtual world technology through three different lenses—students as employee-users, students as strategic designers and decision makers, and students as theorists. The instructor’s approach to communication principles relevant to persistent virtual worlds should be grounded in current and anticipated business applications. Emerging business practice provides guidance regarding the communication principles and skills that might be required of students entering careers in a contemporary business world of networked, digitized, and virtually enhanced communication.
Bargiela-ChiappiniF.NickersonC. (Eds.). (1999). Writing business: Genres, media and discourses. Essex, England: Pearson Education.
7.
BarkerP. (2008). How social media is transforming employee communications at Sun Microsystems. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 27(4), 6-14.
8.
BeardL.WilsonK.MorraD.KeelenJ. (2009). A survey of health-related activities on Second Life. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e17-e19. Retrieved from http://www.jmir.org/2009/2/e17/
9.
BeerD.GeesinB. (2009). Rockin’ with the avatars: “Live” music and the virtual spaces of Second Life. In HeiderD. (Ed.), Living virtually: Researching new worlds (pp. 111-128). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Brand Science Institute. (2007). First customer satisfaction survey in Second Life—Insufficient customer care and opportunities for interaction between Second Life users and companies identified as the main weakness [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.openpr.com/news/17221/First-customer-satisfaction-survey-
17.
BrummettB. (1984). Rhetorical theory as heuristic and moral: A pedagogical justification. Communication Education, 33, 97-107.
18.
BurgessD. (2005). What motivates employees to transfer knowledge outside their work unit. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 324-348.
19.
CardonP. W.OkoroE. (2010). A measured approach to adopting new media in the business communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 73, 434-438.
20.
CarmichaelK. (2011). Axecorp’s team challenge teaching teamwork via 3D social networking platforms. Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 479-485.
21.
ChealC. (2007). Second life: Hype or hyperlearning?On the Horizon, 15, 204-210.
22.
CoombsG. (2010). Using Second Life for teaching management of creativity and innovation. InWankelC. (Ed.), Cutting-edge social media approaches to business education: Teaching with LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Second Life, and blogs (pp. 141-157). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
CyphertD. (2001). Ideology, knowledge and text: Pulling at the knot in Ariadne’s thread. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87, 378-395.
25.
CyphertD.RadwanJ. P.RauchJ. L. (2007). Addressing the rhetorical issues of virtual decision-making. Paper presented at the Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition, University Park, PA.
26.
De LuciaA.FranceseR.PasseroI.TortoraG. (2008). Slmeeting: Supporting collaborative work in Second Life. Paper presented at the AVI ’08, Napoli, Italy.
DetlorB. (1998). Facilitating organizational information access in global network environments: Towards a new framework for intranet design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 190-204.
30.
DiehlW. C.PrinsE. (2008). Unintended outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural literacy and cultural identity in a virtual world. Language & Intercultural Communication, 8, 101-118.
31.
DowningJ.GarmonC. (2001). Teaching students in the basic course how to use presentation software. Communication Education, 50, 218-229.
32.
DoyleD. (2010). Immersed in learning: Supporting creative practice in virtual worlds. Learning, Media & Technology, 35, 99-110.
33.
EhningerD. (1968). On systems of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 327-339.
FinnH. (2011, September10). The reality of the virtual. Wall Street Journal, p. C12.
38.
FlanaginA. J.WaldeckJ. H. (2004). Technology use and organizational newcomer socialization. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 137-165.
39.
Gartner, Inc. (2007). Gartner says 80 percent of active Internet users will have a “Second life” in the virtual world by the end of 2011 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503861
GeeJ. P. (2010). New digital media and learning as an emerging area and “worked examples” as one way forward. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
GorsevskiE. (2010). Running free in Angelina Jolie’s virtual body: The myth of the new frontier and gender liberation in Second Life. In PerlichJ.WhittD. (Eds.), Millennial mythmaking: Essays on the power of science fiction and fantasy literature, films and games (pp. 146-166). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
44.
GowenS. G. (1992). The politics of workplace literacy: A case study. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45.
GronbeckB. E.FarrellT. J.SoukupP. A. (Eds.). (1991). Media, consciousness, and culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
HindsP.KieslerS. (1995). Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organization Science, 6, 373-393.
HogerE. A.CapellJ. J.MyerscoughM. A. (1998). Navigating the web with a typology of corporate uses. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(2), 39-47.
54.
InnisH. A. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
55.
IvoryJ. D. (2009). Technological developments and transitions in virtual worlds. In HeiderD. (Ed.), Living virtually: Researching new worlds (pp. 11-22). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
56.
JanaR.McConnonA. (2006, November27). Second Life lessons. Business Week, p. 17.
57.
JenningsN.CollinsC. (2008). Virtual or virtually U: Educational institutions in Second Life. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 179-185.
58.
JenningsS. E. (2010). Virtually endless possibilities for business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 73, 456-459.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2009). Consumer use and business potential of virtual worlds: The case of “Second Life.”JMM: The International Journal of Media Management, 11, 93-101.
61.
KappK. M.O’DriscollT. (2010). Learning in 3D: Adding a new dimension to enterprise learning and collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
62.
Kasper-FuehreraE. C.AshkanasyN. M. (2001). Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations. Journal of Management, 27, 235-254.
63.
KirkpatrickD. (2007, February5). It’s not a game. Fortune, pp. 56-62.
LyotardJ.-F. (1979/1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Vol. 10, BenningtonG.MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MajchrzakA.MalhotraA.StampsJ.LipnackJ. (2004). Can absence make a team grow stronger?Harvard Business Review, 82(5), 131-137.
79.
MaxwellD.AguilarS.MonteP.NolanD. (2011). Two navy virtual world collaboration applications: Rapid prototyping and concept of operations experimentation. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 4(2), Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/2113/5551
80.
McMillanJ. J.HydeM. J. (2000). Technological innovation and change: A case study in the formation of organizational conscience. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 86, 19-47.
81.
MengM. (2005). IT design for sustaining virtual communities: An identity-based approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
MenneckeB. E.McNeillD.RocheE.BrayD.TownsendA.LesterJ. (2008). Second Life and other virtual worlds: A roadmap for research. Communications of the AIS, 20, 371-388.
ReevesB.ReadJ. L. (2009). Total engagement: Using games and virtual worlds to change the way people work and businesses compete. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
SanchezJ. (2007). A sociotechnical analysis of Second Life in an undergraduate English course. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, VA. Retrieved from http://research.educatorscoop.org/SL.Sociotech.Sanchez.pdf
103.
SaundersC. S.Van SlykeC.VogelD. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 19-31.
SmeltzerL. (1992). Supervisory-subordinate communication when mediated by audio-graphics teleconferencing. Journal of Business Communication, 29, 161-178.
106.
SmithD. (2009). Some corporate virtual worlds have become “ghost towns.”Strategic Communication Management, 12(6), 9.
VorvoreanuM. (2008). Organizational presence in Second Life: Analysis of communication strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
WankelC. (2010). Technologies that bring learners collaboratively together with the world. In WankelC. (Ed.), Cutting-edge social media approaches to business education: Teaching with Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter, Second Life, and blogs (pp. 1-5). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
WoodN. T. (2010). Growing up “virtual”: Interactive technologies and their impact on youth consumer behavior. In TutenT. (Ed.), Enterprise 2.0: How technology, ecommerce, and web 2.0 are transforming business virtually (Vol. 2, pp. 167-182). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
124.
WoodN. T.SolomonM. R. (2010). Adonis or atrocious: Spokesavatars and source effects in immersive digital environments. In EastinM. S.DaughertyT.BurnsN. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on digital media and advertising: User generated content consumption (pp. 521-534). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
125.
WorleyR. B. (2010). Business communication and new media. Business Communication Quarterly, 73, 432-434.
126.
WurtzM. S.CyphertD.DuclosL. K. (2011). vManagement: Observations on the practice of management in a virtual world. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX.
127.
YatesJ. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
128.
YeeN.BailensonJ. N.DucheneautN. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online. Communication Research, 36, 285-312.
