This article examines website headings used by Fortune 500 companies in their efforts to inform stakeholders about corporate social responsibility (CSR). Instead of using “Corporate Social Responsibility” as a heading, companies often use specific terms to identify various CSR initiatives. The purpose of this article is to identify common CSR-related headings that are currently used on Fortune 500 company websites. Data were collected from all Fortune 500 company websites. The websites were further analyzed according to manufacturing, retailing, and service industry. Interesting similarities and differences were found. This study provides guidance on articulating CSR-related activities to consumers, employees, and stakeholders.
AlbingerH. S.FreemanS. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243-253.
2.
BauerT. N.Aiman-SmithL. (1996). Green career choices: The influence of ecological stance on recruiting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 445-458.
3.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.
4.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS.KorshchunD. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. Sloan Management Review, 49, 37-44.
5.
BlazovichJ.SmithL. M. (2011). Ethical corporate citizenship: Does it pay?Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 15, 127-163.
6.
BoalK. B.PeeryN. (1985). The cognitive structure of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 11, 71-82.
7.
BrownT. J. (1998). Corporate associations in marketing antecedents and consequences. Corporate Reputation Review, 1, 215-233.
8.
BrownT.DacinP. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68-84.
9.
CarrollA. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
10.
CarrollA. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38, 268-295.
11.
CarrollA. B. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 106-113). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
12.
ChabowskiB. R.MenaJ. A.Gonzalez-PadronT. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958-2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 55-70.
CraneA.MattenD. (2010). Business ethics. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 45-51). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
15.
CroninJ. J.Jr.SmithJ. S.GleimM. R.RamirezE.MartinezJ. D. (2010). Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 158-174.
16.
de BakkerF. G. A.den HondF. (2008). Activists’ influence tactics and corporate policies. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 107-111.
17.
DeKayS. H. (2011). When doing what’s right becomes messy. Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 412-414.
18.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2007). Reaping relationship rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224-241.
19.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19.
20.
ElbingA. O.Jr.(1970). The value issue of business: The responsibility of the businessman. Academy of Management Journal, 13(1), 79-89.
21.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Socially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1-19.
22.
EllonenH.TarkiainenA.KuivalainenO. (2010). The effect of website usage and virtual community participation on brand relationships. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 6, 85-105.
EsrockS. L.LeichtyG. B. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda setting. Public Relations Review, 24, 305-319.
25.
FerrellO. C.Gozalez-PadronT.HultG. T. M.MaignanI. (2010). From market orientation to stakeholder orientation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 93-96.
26.
GavinJ. F.MaynardW. S. (1975). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Personnel Psychology, 28, 377-387.
GreeningD. W.TurbanD. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39, 254-280.
29.
GrosserK. (2010). Diversity. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 138-140). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
30.
HalleyD. (2010). Community development. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 76-77). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
KimS.ParkH. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 639-653.
38.
KingA.LenoxM. J. (2002). Exploring the profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48, 289-299.
39.
KlassenR.WhybarkD. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 599-615.
40.
KotlerP. (2010). Green marketing. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 213). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
41.
KotlerP.LeeN. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New York, NY: Wiley.
42.
KuosmanenT.KuosmanenN. (2009). How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might). Ecological Economics, 69, 235-243.
LeipzigerD. (2010). Health and safety. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 216-221). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
45.
LevinL. A.BehrensS. J. (2003). From swoosh to swoon: Linguistic analysis of Nike’s changing image. Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 52-65.
46.
LichtensteinD. R.DrumwrightM. E.BraigB. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on consumer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16-32.
47.
LockettA.MoonJ.VisserW. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 115-136.
48.
LuoX.BhattacharyaC. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1-18.
49.
LuoX.BhattacharyaC. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73, 198-213.
50.
MaignanI.RalstonD. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 497-514.
51.
MakniR. C.FrancoeurC.BallavanceF. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409-422.
52.
MarinL.RuizS.RubioA. (2009). The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 65-78.
53.
McIntoshM. (2010). Corporate citizenship. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 85-89). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
54.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.
55.
MontielI. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21, 245-269.
56.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF. L.ReynesS. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
57.
PirschJ.GuptaS.GrauS. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 125-151.
58.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
59.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2002). 2002 Sustainability Survey Report. New York, NY: Author.
60.
PurcellT. V. (1974). What are the social responsibilities for psychologists in industry? A symposium. Personnel Psychology, 27, 435-453.
61.
RuffB. M.MuralidharK.BrownR. M.JanneyJ. J.PaulK. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143-156.
62.
RuppD. E.GanapathiJ.AguileraR. V.WilliamsC. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 537-543.
63.
RussoM.FoutsP. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534-559.
64.
SharmaS.SharmaJ.DeviA. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: The key role of human resource management. Business Intelligence Journal, 2, 205-213.
65.
ShethJ. N.SethiaN. K.SrinivasS. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 21-39.
66.
SmithK. T.SmithL. M.WangK. (2010). Does brand management of corporate reputation translate into higher market value?Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(3), 29-34.
Van de VeldeE.VermeirW.CortenF. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 129-138.
69.
VerbovenH. (2011). Communicating CSR and business identity in the chemical industry through mission slogans. Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 415-431.
70.
VisserW. (2010). Sustainability. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 384-385). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
71.
VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN., (Eds.). (2010). The A-Z of corporate social responsibility. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
72.
WattsP.HolmeR. (1999, January). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 1-34.
WilsonE. (2010). Environment. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A-Z of corporate social responsibility (pp. 156-159). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
75.
WrightP.FerrisS. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 77-83.
76.
ZenisekT. J. (1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4, 359-368.
