The authors investigate the importance of instructor communication behaviors in a course on business communication, arguing that alignment between instructor behaviors and the precepts of the discipline has a pronounced effect on perceived instructor credibility in this field. Student evaluations were analyzed qualitatively for their comments on instructor communication behaviors and quantitatively for the ratings students gave their instructors. This suggests a relationship between the two. The authors outline two classroom exercises to help students develop best practice in business communication, while also enhancing instructors’ credibility by showing how they apply best practice in their own documents.
BiggsJ.TangC. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
2.
BoiceR. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
ChismN. V. N. (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker.
4.
CookJ. S. (2002, November). Undergraduate teaching assistants: The relationship between credibility and learning in the basic communication course. Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of the national Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
5.
DiPietroM.FayeA. (2005). Online student-ratings-of-instruction (SRI) mechanisms for maximal feedback to instructors. Session presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, Milwaukee, WI.
6.
DommeyerC. J.BaumP.HannaR. W.ChapmanK. S. (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: The effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 611-623.
7.
EdwardsC.MyersS. (2007). Perceived instructor credibility as a function of instructor aggressive communication. Communication Research Reports, 24(1), 47-53.
8.
FeldmanK. A. (1983). Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Research in Higher Education, 18, 3-125.
9.
FeldmanK. A. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In PerryR.SmartJ. (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 93-129). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
10.
FranklinJ. (2001). Interpreting the numbers: Using a narrative to help others read student evaluations of your teaching accurately. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 87, 85-100.
11.
FrymierA.ThompsonC. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
12.
GoodboyA.MartinM.BolkanS. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58, 372-396.
13.
HenningZ. (2010). Teaching with style to manage student perceptions: The effects of socio-communicative style and teacher credibility on student affective learning. Communication Research Reports, 27, 58-67.
14.
HiemstraK. M. (1999). Shake my hand: Making the right first impression in business with nonverbal communications. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(4), 71-74.
15.
HustonT. A.GreenD. A. (2008, October). “I hate this course!” How useful are student evaluation comments?Session presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. Reno, NV.
16.
KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S.MasiaB. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II. Affective domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
17.
LewisK. G. (2001). Making sense of student written comments. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 87, 25-32.
18.
MarshH. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
19.
MarshH. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In PerryR.SmartJ. (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319-383). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
20.
MartinM.ChesebroJMottetT. (1997). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 14, 431-440.
21.
McCroskeyJ.YoungT. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32(2), 24-34.
22.
MyersS. (2001). Perceived instructor credibility and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 18, 354-364.
23.
MyersS.BryantL. (2004). College students’ perceptions of how instructors convey credibility. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 5, 22-27.
24.
RichmondV.GorhamJ.McCroskeyJ. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Communication Yearbook, 10, 574-590. Retrieved from http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/publications/140.pdf
25.
SchrodtP.WittP.TurmanP.MyersS.BartonM.JernbergK. (2009). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructors’ prosocial communication behaviors and students’ learning outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 350-371.
26.
SeelsB.GlasgowZ. (1990). Exercises in instructional design. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
27.
SheerV.FungT. (2007). Can email communication enhance professor-student relationship and student evaluation of professor? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37, 289-306.
28.
SpoorenP.MortelmansD.DenekensJ. (2007). Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: Development of an instrument based on 10 Likert-scales. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 667-679.
29.
TevenJ.McCroskeyJ. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1-9.
30.
ThompsonB. (2007). The syllabus as a communication document: Constructing and presenting the syllabus. Communication Education, 56, 54-71.
31.
VenetteS.SellnowD.McIntyreK. (2010). Charting new territory: Assessing the online frontier of student ratings of instruction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 101-115.
32.
WilliamsL. S. (2006). Communication across the campus: Expanding our mission to practice what we profess. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 158-171.
