Undergraduate business communication students were surveyed to determine their perceived most effective method of assessment on writing assignments. The results indicated students’ preference for a process that incorporates visual, auditory, and e-handwritten presentation via a tablet PC. Students also identified this assessment process would improve their writing by helping them understand the types of errors they were making and why these errors were incorrect. Students also indicated this type of assessment would help build a relationship with the instructor and help them be successful in the class.
Baker, J.D. ( 2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 1-13.
2.
Burnham, C. ( 1986). Portfolio evaluation: Room to breathe and grow. In C. Bridges (Ed.), New teachers in the college composition class: Essays for novice teachers and their supervisors (pp. 125-138). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
3.
Deans, T. ( 2009). Requiring revision. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/views/2009/06/25/deans
4.
Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. ( 2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A Comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 486-500.
5.
Garrison, D.R. ( 2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive and teach presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 61-72.
6.
Garrison, D.R., & Arbaugh, J.B. ( 2007). Research the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education , 10, 157-172.
7.
Hemby, K.V., Wilkinson, K., & Crews, T.B. ( 2006, Fall). Converting assessment of traditional classroom assignments to the e-Learning environment. Online Journal for Work-force Education and Development, 2(2). Retrieved from http://wed.siu.edu/Journal/VolIInum2/VolInum5.php
8.
Hillocks, G. ( 1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching . Urbana, IL: NCTE/ERIC Clearinghouse .
9.
Huba, M.E., & Freed, J.E. ( 2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Jameson, D.A. ( 2007). Literacy in decline: Untangling the evidence. Business Communication Quarterly, 70, 16-33.
11.
Knoblauch, C.H., & Brannon, L. ( 1984). Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing. Portsmouth, England: Heinemann.
12.
Meyen, E.L., Aust, R.J., Bui, Y.N., & Issacson, R. ( 2002). Assessing and monitoring student progress in an e-learning personnel preparation environment. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 187-198.
13.
Parini, J. ( 2008, February 15). The unbearable importance of grading. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54, A38.
14.
Pittenger, K.S., Miller, M.C., & Allison, J. ( 2006). Can we succeed in teaching business students to write effectively? Business Communication Quarterly, 60, 257-263.
15.
Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K. ( 2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68-88.
16.
Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., & Pead. D. ( 2004). Literature review of e-assessment. Bristol, England: Nesta Future Lab.
17.
Sommers, N. ( 1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156.
18.
University of Southern California. (2007). Assessment of teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://cet.usc.edu/resources/teaching_learning/assessment.html
19.
White, E. ( 1986). Teaching and assessing writing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Wilkinson, K., Crews, T.B., & Kinley, E. ( 2008, April). Enriching the learning experience for e-learners: Making assessment real. Proceedings from the Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, 3, 75-77.
