Buchanan, R. (1995). Rhetoric, humanism, and design. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 23-66). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
2.
Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
3.
Cross, N. (1989). Engineering design methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
Geisler, C. (1993). The relationship between language and design in mechanical engineering: Some preliminary observations. Technical Communication, 40( 1 ), 173-176.
5.
Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
Geisler, C., and Lewis, B. (in press). Remaking the world through talk and text: What we should learn from how engineers use language to design. In R. Horowitz (Ed.), Talk about text: Developing understanding of the world through talk and text. International Reading Association.
7.
Hawkins, S., Coney, M.B., & Bystrom, K. (1996, January). Incidental writing in the engineering classroom. Journal of Engineering Education, 27-33.
8.
Medway, P. (1994). The Language component in technological capability: Lessons from architecture. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 85-107.
9.
Medway, P. (1996). Virtual and material buildings: Construction and constructionism in architecture and writing. Written Communication , 13, 473-514.
10.
Miller, C.R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610-617.
11.
Miller, C.R. (1985). Invention in technical and scientific discourse: A prospective survey. In M. G. Moran and D. Journet (Eds.), Research in technical communication: A bibliographic sourcebook (pp. 117-162). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
12.
Miller, C.R., & Selzer, J. (1985). Special topics of argument in engineering reports . In L. Odell and D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 309-341). New York: Guilford.
13.
Nagy, R.L., Ullman, D.G., & Dietterich, T.G. (1989). A data representation for collaborative mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design , 3, 233-242.
14.
Pahl, G.,& Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering design. London : The Design Council.
15.
Ullman, D.G., Dietterich, T.G., & Stauffer, L.A. (1988). A model of the mechanical engineering design process based on empirical data. AI EDAM , 2(1), 33-52.
16.
Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
Winsor, D.A. (1992). What counts as writing? An argument from engineers' practice. Journal of Advanced Composition, 12, 337-347.
18.
Winsor, D.A. (1994). Invention and writing in technical work: Representing the object. Written Communication, 11, 227-250.
19.
Winsor, D.A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
20.
Wood, C.C. (1992). A cultural cognitive approach to collaborative writing. Cognitive Science Research Paper, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, The University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QH.
21.
Young, R.E. (1976). Invention: A topographical survey. In G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition: Ten bibliographic essays (pp. 1-43). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
