Barbour, D.H. (1992). The best of both worlds: Instructor/group evaluation of business writing assignments. Journal of Business and Technical Communications, 6(4), 480-486.
2.
Bumett, R.E. (1991). Substantive conflict in a cooperative context: A way to improve the collaborative planning of workplace documents. Technical Communication, 38(4), 532-539.
3.
Cooper, J., & Mueck, R. (1992). Student involvement in learning: Cooperative learning and college instruction. In A. S. Goodsell (Ed.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 101-107). National Center of Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. University Park, PA. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357 705.
4.
Fiechtner, S.B., & Davis, E.A. (1992). Why some groups fail: A survey of students' experiences with learning groups. In A. S. Goodsell (Ed.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 86-98). National Center of Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. University Park, PA. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357 705.
5.
Hirokawa, R.Y., & Pace, R. (1983). A descriptive investigation of the possible communication-based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Communication Monographs, 50(4), 363-379.
6.
McKay, M., & Van Epps, P. (1997, November). Using type theory to teach collaborative writing. Paper presented at the 62nd annual meeting of The Association for Business Communication, Washington, D.C.
7.
Mohler, J. (1991). The DISC Test Battery. Princeton : Mohler Associates.