Adults with and without disabilities were surveyed to investigate similarities and differences between these groups on dimensions of quality of life. Differences were found in marital status and opportunities to make choices, as well as in the extent of social networks and activities experienced by these two groups. The authors contend that quality of life is a socially constructed phenomenon that must be addressed by increasing opportunities for self-determination in terms of both skill development and environmental supports.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellamyG. T.NewtonJ. S.LeBaronN. M. & HornerR. H. (1990). Quality of life and lifestyle outcomes: A challenge for residential programs. In ShalockR. L. (ed.), Quality of Life: Perspectives and issues. Washington, D. C.: American Association on Mental Retardation.
2.
BooneH. A. & StevensE. (1991). Towards an enhanced family and child quality of life. In KrajicekM. & TompkinsR. (Eds.), The medically fragile infant. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
3.
EdgertonR. B. (1990). Quality of life from a longitudinal research perspective. In ShalockR. L. (ed.), Quality of Life: Perspectives and issues. Washington, D. C.: American Association on Mental Retardation.
4.
GoodeD. A. (1990). Thinking about and discussing quality of life. In ShalockR. L. (ed.), Quality of Life: Perspectives and issues. Washington, D. C.: American Association on Mental Retardation.
5.
HawkinsR. P. (1991). Is social validity what we are interested in? Argument for a functional approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 205–214.
6.
KennedyC. H.HornerR. H. & NewtonJ. S. (1990). The social networks and activity patterns of adults with severe disabilities: A correlational analysis. JASH, 15(2), 86–90.
7.
KozleskiE. B., & SandsD. J. (1992). The yardstick of social validity: Evaluating quality of life as perceived by adults without disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 119–131.
8.
LandesmanS. (1986). Quality of life and personal satisfaction: Definition and measurement issues. Mental Retardation, 24, 141–143.
9.
PierceT. B. Jr.LuckassonR. & SmithD. D. (1990). Surveying unstructured time of adults with mental retardation living in two community settings: A search for normalization. Exceptionality, 1, 123–134.
10.
SandsD. J.KozleskiE. B. & GoodwinL. D. (1992). Quality of Life for workers with disabilities: Fact or fiction?Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 15, 157–177.
11.
SandsD. J.KozleskiE. B. & GoodwinL. D. (1991). Whose needs are we meeting? Results of a consumer satisfaction survey of person with developmental disabilities in Colorado. Research in Developmental Disabilities.
12.
SPSS, Inc. (1989). SPSS/PC+ Update for V3.0 and V3.1. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
13.
StoreyK., & HornerR. H. (1991). An evaluative review of social validation research involving persons with handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 25(3), 352–401.
14.
Temple University (1988). A national survey of consumers of services for individuals with developmental disabilities: Final survey instrument. Unpublished instrument. Washington DC: National Developmental Disabilities Planning Council.
15.
WehmanP.KregelJ., & ShaferM. S. (1989). Emerging trends in the national supported employment initiative: A preliminary analysis of twenty-seven states. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Research and Training Center on Supported Employment.
