The main objective of this research is to study the relationships of offense-supportive cognitions and sexual fantasies with sex crime. The research involved 48 men: 26 convicted of sexual offenses against minors and 22 convicted of sexual offenses against adults from different prisons in the Community of Madrid, Spain. We used the RAPE Scale and the Sex With Children Scale to evaluate offense-supportive cognitions and an ad hoc adaptation of the Multidimensional Developmental, Sex and Aggression Inventory to evaluate sexual fantasies with minors and sadomasochistic fantasies. The results show that both groups present similar offense-supportive cognitions, while each group had significantly more sexual fantasies related to their specific crime. Participants who had sexual fantasies about minors presented significantly more offense-supportive cognitions justifying child sexual abuse than those who did not present these fantasies, while participants with sadomasochistic fantasies did not present more offense-supportive cognitions about rape. After collecting this information, we ran four mediation models to assess potential relationships between fantasies, offense-supportive cognitions, and specific sexual crime. The mediation models showed that both sexual fantasies with minors and sadomasochistic fantasies had direct relationships with sex crimes. Upon further confirmation with studies with larger sample sizes, our findings support the importance of dealing with sexual fantasies in treatment of people convicted of sexual offenses and imply a need for differentiated treatment, since the content of sexual fantasies was different in each group.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(84)90008-6
2.
AbelG. G.GoreD. K.HollandC. L.CampsN.BeckerJ. V.RathnerJ. (1989). The measurment of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00851319
3.
ArkowitzS.VessJ. (2003). An evaluation of the Bumby RAPE and MOLEST scales as measures of cognitive distortions with civilly committed sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320301500402
4.
BaićV.LajićO.IvanovićZ. (2019). Sexual fantasies of the rapists. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2019.4.04
BartelsR. M.BeechA. R.HarkinsL. (2021). Understanding sexual thoughts and sexual fantasizing: The dual‐process model of sexual thinking. In Sexual deviance: Understanding and managing deviant sexual interests and paraphilic disorders (pp. 53–66). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119771401
7.
BartelsR. M.GannonT. A. (2011). Understanding the sexual fantasies of sex offenders and their correlates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(6), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.08.002
8.
BeckJ. (2000). Terapia cognitiva. Conceptos básicos y profundización. Gedisa S.A.
9.
BeechA.FisherD.WardT. (2005). Sexual murderers’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(11), 1366–1389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278712
10.
BirkeJ.BondüR. (2023). From fantasy to reality: Self-reported aggression-related sexual fantasies predict sexually sadistic behavior beyond indirect and direct measures of sexual preference. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(4), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.2022588
11.
BumbyK. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258015
CastroM. E.López-CastedoA.SueiroE. (2009). Perfil sociodemográfico-penal y distorsiones cognitivas en delincuentes sexuales [Socio-demographic-criminal profile and cognitive distortions in sex offenders]. Revista Galego-portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 17(1, 2), 155–166. Retrieved from. https://hdl.handle.net/2183/7638
14.
ChambersJ. C.EcclestonL.DayA.WardT.HowellsK. (2008). Treatment readiness in violent offenders: The influence of cognitive factors on engagement in violence programs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(4), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.04.003
15.
De la RubiaJ. M. (2010). Fantasías sexuales en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos [Sexual fantasies in Mexican university students]. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 246–255. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/ric/article/view/734
16.
Del Real CastrilloC. (2019). Capítulo 6. Infractores, víctimas y características del abuso sexual contra menores en España [Offenders, victims and characteristics of child sexual abuse in Spain], en Rodríguez Mesa, MJ (Dir.), Del Real Castrillo, C., y Maldonado Guzmán, D. (Coords.), Pederastia. Análisis jurídico-penal, social y criminológico [Pederasty. Legal-criminal, social and criminological analysis]. Editorial Aranzadi, pp. 165–206.
17.
D’UrsoG.PetruccelliI.GrilliS.PaceU. (2019). Risk factors related to cognitive distortions toward women and moral disengagement: A study on sex offenders. Sexuality & Culture, 23(2), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9572-9
18.
DyshnikuF. (2014). Effect of deviant sexual fantasies on aberrant sexual behaviours. In Electronic theses and dissertations (Vol. 5024). University of Windsor. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5024/
19.
EberhautS.SchmidtA. F.BanseR.EherR. (2022). Child abuse myths are pedophilic myths: Cognitive distortions are stronger in individuals convicted of sexual offenses diagnosed with pedophilia compared to those without such diagnosis. Deviant Behavior, 44(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2132548
20.
FeelgoodS.CortoniF.ThompsonA. (2005). Sexual coping, general coping and cognitive distortions in incarcerated rapists and child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600500073657
21.
FinkelhorD. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. Free Press.
22.
GannonT. A.KeownK.PolaschekD. L. (2007). Increasing honest responding on cognitive distortions in child molesters: The bogus pipeline revisited. Sexual Abuse, 19(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900103
23.
GeeD. G.DevillyG. J.WardT. (2004). The content of sexual fantasies for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600405
24.
GeeD. G.WardT.EcclestonL. (2003). The function of sexual fantasies for sexual offenders: A preliminary model. Behaviour Change, 20(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.20.1.44.24846
25.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
HeasmanA.ForemanT. (2019). Bioethical issues and secondary prevention for nonoffending individuals with pedophilia. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 28(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180119000094
28.
HelmondP.OverbeekG.BrugmanD.GibbsJ. C. (2015). A meta-analysis on cognitive distortions and externalizing problem behavior: Associations, moderators, and treatment effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814552842
29.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.MannR. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), 34–53. https://doi.irg/10.1177/1524838012462244
30.
HermannC. A.BabchishinK. M.NunesK. L.Leth-SteensenC.CortoniF. (2012). Factor structure of the Bumby rape scale: A two-factor model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812436802
31.
HermannC. A.NunesK. L.MaimoneS. (2018). Examining implicit and explicit evaluations of sexual aggression and sexually aggressive behavior in men recruited online. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216681560
32.
HerreroO. (2018). Agresores sexuales: Teoría, evaluación y tratamiento [Sex offenders: Theory, assessment and treatment]. Síntesis.
33.
JahnkeS.HoyerJ. (2013). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: A blind spot in stigma research. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2013.795921
LittleC. A.ByersE. S. (2000). Differences between positive and negative cognitions. Canadian Journal for Human Sexuality, 9(3), 167–179.
36.
LoomanJ. (1995). Sexual fantasies of child molesters. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 27(3), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.27.3.321
37.
MannR.WebsterS.WakelingH.MarshallW. (2007). The measurement and influence of child sexual abuse supportive beliefs. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13(5), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601061141
38.
MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E.EcclesA. (1991). Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626091006003005
39.
MarshallW. L.HamiltonK.FernandezY. (2001). Empathy deficits and cognitive distortions in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320101300205
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.KingstonD. A. (2011). Are the cognitive distortions of child molesters in need of treatment?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.580572
42.
MarunaS.MannR. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X114608
MoyanoN.SierraJ. C. (2014). Fantasías y pensamientos sexuales: Revisión conceptual y relación con la salud sexual [Sexual fantasies and thoughts: Conceptual review and relationship to sexual health]. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 25(2), 376–393. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-04264-013
46.
NicholsH. R.MolinderI. (1984). Multiphasic sex inventory. User Manual. Fircrest, Nichols and Molinder Assessments.
47.
NoorishadP. G.LevaqueE.ByersE. S.ShaughnessyK. (2019). More than one flavour: University students’ specific sexual fantasies, interests, and experiences. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2019-0024
48.
Ó CiardhaC.GannonT. A. (2011). The cognitive distortions of child molesters are in need of treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.580573
49.
O’ConnorA.GannonT. A. (2021). An examination of the prevalence and characteristics of UK community males who hold a sexual interest in children using the revised interest in child molestation scale. Psychology, Crime and Law, 27(10), 988–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1876049
50.
PaquetteS.CortoniF. (2021). Offence-supportive cognitions, atypical sexuality, problematic self-regulation, and perceived anonymity among online and contact sexual offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 2173–2187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01863-z
51.
PaquetteS.FortinF. (2023). A peek into their mind? An exploration of links between offense-supportive statements and behaviors among men who sexually exploit children and adolescents online. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(6-7), 591–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211013523
52.
PaquetteS.LongpréN.CortoniF. (2020). A billion distorted thoughts: An exploratory study of criminogenic cognitions among men who sexually exploit children over the internet. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(10-11), 1114–1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19873082
53.
ProulxJ.PerreaultC.OuimetM. (1999). Pathways in the offending process of extrafamilial sexual child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329901100203
54.
RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2010). Are moral disengagement, neutralization techniques, and self-serving cognitive distortions the same? Developing a unified scale of moral neutralization of aggression. International Journal of Computer Vision, 4(2), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2833
55.
Sáez-GonzálezE. (2022). La pornografía como ideóloga de la violencia sexual: los contenidos pornográficos más vistos y su traducción a la realidad social[Pornography as an ideologue of sexual violence: the most viewed pornographic contents and their translation into social reality] en E. Bandrés. In DíezR.Aránguezy T. (Eds.), Feminismos aplicados: un enfoque desde la educación, género, violencia estructural y los movimientos sociales [Applied Feminisms: An approach from education, gender, structural violence and social movements] (pp. 235–262). Dykinson S.L.
SetoM. C.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.BarbareeH. E. (2004). The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037426.55935.9c
59.
SnyderC. R.HigginsR. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.23
60.
SzumskiF.BartelsR. M.BeechA. R.FisherD. (2018). Distorted cognition related to male sexual offending: The multi-mechanism theory of cognitive distortions (MMT-CD). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.001
61.
ThorntonD. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320201400205
62.
TrabazoV.AzorF. (2009). La pedofilia: Un problema clínico, legal y social [pedophilia: A clinical, legal and social problem]. EduPsykhé: Revista de Psicología y Educación, 8(2), 195–219. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3145999
63.
ValenciaO. L.AndreuJ. M.GrañaJ. L. (2016). Reincidencia y caracterización de los agresores sexuales en tratamiento penitenciario [Recidivism and characterisation of sex offenders in prison treatment]. [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
64.
ValenciaO. L.AndreuJ. M.MínguezP.LabradorM. A. (2008). Nivel de reincidencia en agresores sexuales bajo tratamiento en programas de control de la agresión sexual [Level of recidivism among sex offenders undergoing treatment in sexual assault management programmes]. Psicopatología Clínica Legal y Forense, 8(1), 7–18. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3238774
65.
Van VugtE.HendriksJ.StamsG. J.Van ExterF.BijleveldC.Van der LaanP.AsscherJ. (2011). Moral judgment, cognitive distortions and implicit theories in young sex offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(4), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2011.603189
66.
VanderstukkenO.BenbouricheM.PhamT. H.LefebvreL. (2015). Les distorsions cognitives des auteurs d’agression sexuelle d’enfant: définitions, fonctions, et enjeux théoriques [Cognitive distortions in child sexual abusers: definitions, functions, and theoretical issues]. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 25(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcc.2014.11.001
WardT.BeechA. (2017). An integrated theory of sexual offending—Revised: A multifield-perspective. In BoerD. P.WardT. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending—Section I: Current multifactorial theories (pp. 123–137). Wiley-Blackwell.
WrightR. C.SchneiderS. L. (1997). Deviant sexual fantasies as motivated self-deception. In SchwartzB. K.CelliniH. R. (Eds.), The sex offender: New insights, treatment motivations and legal developments (Vol. 2, pp. 8.1–8.14). Civic Research Institute.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
