The prevalence rates of paraphilic interests and disorders in the general population have been understudied, in large part due to the lack of a standardized assessment measure. As a result, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 provides little information regarding the prevalence of paraphilic disorders. The present study involved the development of a self-report measure, Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale (PIDS), that can be used to assess for the eight paraphilic interests/disorders in the DSM-5 for use with general population samples. Study 1 established the content validity of the PIDS using feedback from 22 experts in the field, and recommendations from these experts were utilized to modify the measure. In Study 2, the PIDS was piloted on 100 individuals in the general population, which supported the feasibility of implementation and its limited-efficacy. While the PIDS requires further psychometric support, the current research suggests the PIDS is a promising tool to gather self-report, population-based data on DSM-5 paraphilic interests and disorders.
AhlersC. J.SchaeferG. A.MundtI. A.RollS.EnglertH.WillichS. N.BeierK. M. (2011). How unusual are the contents of paraphilias? Paraphilia‐associated sexual arousal patterns in a community‐based sample of men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(5), 1362–1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.0159710.1111.x
BártováK.AndrovičováR.KrejčováL.WeissP.KlapilováK. (2021). The prevalence of paraphilic interests in the Czech population: Preference, arousal, the use of pornography, fantasy, and behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1707468
6.
BaurE.ForsmanM.SanttilaP.JohanssonA.SandnabbaK.LångströmN. (2016). Paraphilic sexual interests and sexually coercive behavior: A population-based twin study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0674-2
BhugraD.PopelyukD.McMullenI. (2010). Paraphilias across cultures: Contexts and controversies. Journal of Sex Research, 47(2–3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224491003699833
9.
BouchardK. N.DawsonS. J.LalumièreM. L. (2017). The effects of sex drive and paraphilic interests on paraphilic behaviours in a nonclinical sample of men and women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 26(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.262-a8
10.
BowenD. J.KreuterM.SpringB.Cofta-WoerpelL.LinnanL.WeinerD.BakkenS.KaplanC. P.SquiersL.FabrizioC.FernandezM. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
CantorJ. M.FedoroffJ. P. (2018). Can pedophiles change? Response to opening arguments and conclusions. Current Controversies, 10(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0167-0
13.
ChanH. C. O. (2021). Paraphilic interests: The role of psychosocial factors in a sample of young adults in Hong Kong. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00532-z
14.
ChiversM. L.RoyC.GrimbosT.CantorJ. M.SetoM. C. (2014). Specificity of sexual arousal for sexual activities in men and women with conventional and masochistic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(5), 931–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0174-1
15.
CraigL. A.BartelsR. M. (2021). An overview of sexual deviance and paraphilic disorders. In CraigA.BartelsR. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Understanding and managing deviant sexual interest and paraphilic disorders. (pp. 3–22). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119771401.ch1
16.
DawsonS. J.BannermanB. A.LalumièreM. L. (2016). Paraphilic interests: An examination of sex differences in a nonclinical sample. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214525645
17.
DelceaC.SisermanC. (2020). Validation and standardization of the questionnaire for evaluation of paraphilic disorders. Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine, 28(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2020.14
18.
DeVonH. A.BlockM. E.Moyle‐WrightP.ErnstD. M.HaydenS. J.LazzaraD. J.Kostas‐PolstonE. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing scholarship, 39(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
19.
DombertB.SchmidtA. F.BanseR.BrikenP.HoyerJ.NeutzeJ.OsterheiderM. (2016). How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children?The Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1020108
20.
DunkleyC. R.BrottoL. A. (2018). Clinical considerations in treating BDSM practitioners: A review. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(7), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1451792
21.
FedoroffJ. P.Di GioacchinoL.MurphyL. (2013). Problems with paraphilias in the DSM-5. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(8), 363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0363-6
22.
HarlacherJ. (2016). An educator’s guide to questionnaire DevelopmentREL 2016-108. Regional Educational Laboratory Central.
23.
HaynesS.RichardD.KubanyE. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
24.
HoeppnerB. B.KellyJ. F.UrbanoskiK. A.SlaymakerV. (2011). Comparative utility of a single-item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 41(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.04.005.
25.
HoloydaB. (2020). The admissibility of other specified paraphilic disorder (non‐consent) in sexually violent predator proceedings. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2446
26.
HortonJ. J.ChiltonL. B. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce, Cambridge, MA, USA, 7–11 June, 2010, (pp. 209–218). https://doi.org/10.1145/1807342.1807376
27.
JoyalC. C. (2021). Problems and controversies with psychiatric diagnoses of paraphilia. In CraigA.BartelsR. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Understanding and managing deviant sexual interest and paraphilic disorders. (pp. 91–116). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119771401.ch6
28.
JoyalC. C.CarpentierJ. (2017). The prevalence of paraphilic interests and behaviors in the general population: A provincial survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1139034
29.
KasturiS.BurketJ. C.BermanJ. R.KirouK. A.LevineA. B.SammaritanoL. R.MandlL. A. (2018). Feasibility of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) computerized adaptive tests in systemic lupus erythematosus outpatients. Lupus, 27(10), 1591–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203318778372
30.
KaylorL.JeglicE. (2019). Non-contact paraphilic disorders and offending. In CraigL. A.BartelsR. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Understanding and managing deviant sexual interest and paraphilic disorders. Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
KleinplatzP. J.DiamondL. M. (2014). Sexual Diversity. In TolmanD. L.DiamondL. M.BauermeisterJ. A.GeorgeW. H.PfausJ. G.WardL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1. Person-based approaches (pp. 245–267). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-009
32.
LångströmN.SetoM. C. (2006). Exhibitionistic and Voyeuristic Behavior in a Swedish National Population Survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(4), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9042-6
33.
LawsD. R. (2009). Penile plethysmography: Strengths, limitations, innovations. In ThorntonD.LawsD. R. (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders. (pp. 7–29). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470747551
34.
LehmannR. J.SchmidtA. F.JahnkeS. (2020). Stigmatization of paraphilias and psychological conditions linked to sexual offending. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1754748
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse, 22(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
37.
MoserC. (2019). DSM-5, paraphilias, and the paraphilic disorders: Confusion reigns. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(3), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1356-7
38.
NicholsH. R.MolinderI. (1984). Multiphasic sex inventory: Manual. TacomaNichols and Molinder.
O’DonohueW.LetourneauE. J.DowlingH. (1997). Development and preliminary validation of a paraphilic sexual fantasy questionnaire. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329700900302
PerilloA. D.SpadaA. H.CalkinsC.JeglicE. L. (2014). Examining the scope of questionable diagnostic reliability in sexually violent predator (svp) evaluations. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.005
43.
PernegerT. V.CourvoisierD. S.HudelsonP. M.AngèleG. A. (2015). Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2
44.
PolitD.BeckC. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
45.
PolitD. EHunglerB. P. (1999). Nursing research principles and methods. Lippincott
RodriguesI. B.AdachiJ. D.BeattieK. A.MacDermidJ. C. (2017). Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5
48.
RubioD. M. G.Berg-WegerM.TebbS. S.LeeE. S.RauchS. (2003). Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94–104.
49.
RuelE.WagnerW.,IIIGillespieB. (2016). Pretesting and pilot testing. In The practice of survey research (pp. 101–119). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483391700
50.
RussellA. M.O’DwyerJ. L.BryantL. D.HouseA. O.BirtwistleJ. C.MeerS.Wright-HughesA.WalwynR. E. A.GrahamE.FarrinA. J.HulmeC. T. (2018). The feasibility of using the eq-5d-3l with adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities within a randomized control trial: A qualitative evaluation. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0357-6
51.
SetoM. C.CurryS.DawsonS. J.BradfordJ. M.ChiversM. L. (2020). Concordance of paraphilic interests and behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(4), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1830018
52.
SetoM. C.FedoroffJ. P.BradfordJ. M.KnackN.RodriguesN. C.CurryS.BoothB.GrayJ.CameronC.BourgetD.MessinaS.JamesE.WatsonD.GulatiS.BalmacedaR.AhmedA. G. (2016). Reliability and validity of the dsm-iv-tr and proposed dsm-5 criteria for pedophilia: Implications for the icd-11 and the next dsm. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry: Part A, 49, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.002
53.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L.HarrisG. T.ChiversM. L. (2012). The sexual responses of sexual sadists. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(3), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028714
54.
SetoM. C.StephensS.LalumièreM. L.CantorJ. M. (2017). The revised screening scale for pedophilic interests (SSPI–2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612444
TsangS.RoyseC. F.TerkawiA. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 11(Suppl 1), 89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
Vander MolenL.RonisS. T.BenoitA. A.WalmarkS. (2021). Differential associations between paraphilic interests and sexual satisfaction. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 27(3–4), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2020.1867939.
59.
WilsonG. (1978). The secrets of sexual fantasy. J. M. Dent & Sons.
60.
WintersG. M.JeglicE. L. (2021). The sexual grooming scale – victim version: The development and pilot testing of a measure to assess the nature and extent of child sexual grooming. Victims & Offenders, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1974994
61.
WintersG.JeglicE.KaylorL. (2020). Validation of the sexual grooming model of child sexual abusers. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 855–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2020.1801935
62.
World Health Organization. (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision). https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
63.
ZgouridesG. D. (2020). Disposition and treatment of paraphilia in non-western Cultures. In Cultural differences and the practice of sexual medicine (pp. 253–273). Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_15
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
