Evaluating patient satisfaction in therapeutic settings is consistent with a Risk–Needs–Responsivity (RNR) model. This study provides results from a program improvement initiative in a sexually violent person (SVP) civil commitment facility that queried patients and treatment providers about their satisfaction with therapeutic processes and assessment methods. Overall, patients reported high levels of satisfaction with treatment at the facility, with the highest levels of satisfaction on items about being treated with kindness and respect and staff acting professionally. Providers rated current assessment methods such as the Penile Plethysmography (PPG) assessment, polygraph testing, and neuropsychological testing as most helpful for patients in treatment progress; however, patients rated PPG assessment and polygraph testing as the least helpful of the assessments conducted. Soliciting patient feedback periodically could be important for maintaining treatment engagement and discovering opportunities to enhance patient satisfaction to treatment in a SVP civil commitment setting.
AharonyL.StrasserS. (1993). Patient satisfaction: What we know about and what we still need to explore. Medical Care Review, 50(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002570879305000104
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2016). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Routledge.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811406356
4.
BassP. F.3rd.MaloyJ. W. (2020). How to determine if a project is human subjects research, a quality Improvement project, or both. The Ochsner Journal, 20(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0087
5.
BertolinoB.BargmannS.MillerS. D. (2012). Manual 1. What works in therapy: A primer. ICCE Press.
6.
CasarettD.KarlawishJ. H.SugarmanJ. (2000). Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: Proposed criteria and potential implications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(17), 2275–2280. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.17.2275
7.
DayA. (1999). Sexual offender views about treatment: A client survey. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 8(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v08n02_06
8.
DeSorcyD. R.OlverM. E.WormithJ. S. (2016). Working alliance and its relationship with treatment outcome in a sample of aboriginal and non-aboriginal sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 28(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214556360
9.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
10.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
11.
FinlayW. M.LyonsE. (2001). Methodological issues in interviewing and using self-report questionnaires with people with mental retardation. Psychological Assessment, 13(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.3.319
12.
GannonT. A.OlverM. E.MallionJ. S.JamesM. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
13.
GarrettT.OliverC.WilcoxD. T.MiddletonD. (2003). Who cares? The views of sexual offenders about the group treatment they receive. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320301500408
14.
GeorgeD.MalleryM. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
15.
GoddenE.PasekaA.GnidaJ.InguanzoJ. (2019). The impact of response rate on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HCAHPS) dimension scores. Patient Experience Journal, 6(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1357
16.
GonzálezN.QuintanaJ. M.BilbaoA.EscobarA.AizpuruF.ThompsonA.EstebanC.San SebastianJ. A.de la SierraE. (2005). Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 17(6), 465–472. https://doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi067
17.
GreenwoodN.KeyA.BurnsT.BristowM.SedgewickP. (1999). Satisfaction with in-patient psychiatric services: Relationship to patient and treatment factors. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 174(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.174.2.159
18.
GrubinD. (2010). The polygraph and forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 446–451.
19.
GrubinD.MadsenL.ParsonsS.SosnowskiD.WarbergB. (2004). A prospective study of the impact of polygraphy on high-risk behaviors in adult sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEBU.0000029133.78168.ab
20.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545
21.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 14(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320201400207
22.
HareR. D. (2003). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
23.
HartleyS. L.MacLeanW. E.Jr. (2006). A review of the reliability and validity of Likert-type scales for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(11), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00844.x
24.
HeideggerT.SaalD.NueblingM. (2006). Patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: What is patient satisfaction, how should it be measured, and what is the evidence for assuring high patient satisfaction?Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 20(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2005.10.010
25.
HeilP.AhlmeyerS.SimonsD. (2003). Crossover sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(4), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9058-z
26.
HundtN. E.ArmentoM. E.PorterB.CullyJ. A.KunikM. E.StanleyM. (2013). Predictors of treatment satisfaction among older adults with anxiety in a primary care psychology program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 37, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.01.003
27.
IBM Corporation. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 25.0).
28.
JenningsJ. L.DemingA. (2017). Review of the empirical and clinical support for group therapy specific to sexual abusers. Sexual Abuse, 29(8), 731–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215618376
KnightR. A. (2007). Multidimensional inventory of development, sex, and aggression [Computer software]. https://www.midsa.us
31.
KnightR. A.PrentkyR. A.CerceD. D. (1994). The development, reliability, and validity of an inventory for the multidimensional assessment of sex and aggression. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854894021001006
32.
KokishR. (2004). The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12(3–4), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v12n03_07
33.
LambertM. J.HarmonC.SladeK.WhippleJ. L.HawkinsE. J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20113
34.
La MonicaE. L.OberstM. T.MadeaA. R.WolfR. M. (1986). Development of a patient satisfaction scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 9(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770090108
35.
LevensonJ. S.MacgowanM. J.MorinJ. W.CotterL. P. (2009). Perceptions of sex offenders about treatment: Satisfaction and engagement in group therapy. Sexual Abuse, 21(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208326072
36.
LevensonJ. S.PrescottD. S. (2009). Treatment experiences of civilly committed sex offenders: A consumer satisfaction survey. Sexual Abuse, 21(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208325205
37.
LevensonJ. S.PrescottD. S.D’AmoraD. A. (2010). Sex offender treatment: Consumer satisfaction and engagement in therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08328752
38.
LevensonJ. S.PrescottD. S.JumperS. (2014). A consumer satisfaction survey of civilly committed sex offenders in Illinois. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(4), 474–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12472956
39.
LuborskyL.RosenthalR.DiguerL.AndrusynaT. P.BermanJ. S.LevittJ. T.SeligmanD. A.KrauseE. D. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well—Mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.1.2
40.
LuborskyL.SingerB.LuborskyL. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that everyone has won and all must have prizes?Archives of General Psychiatry, 32(8), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760260059004
41.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The safer society 2009 North American survey. Safer Society Press.
42.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.HokeS. E.Bonn-MillerM. O. (2007). Outcomes in a community sex offender treatment program: A comparison between polygraphed and matched non-polygraphed offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9058-z
43.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.WilliamsM. (2014). Program development and management. In CarichM. S.MussackS. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual abuser assessment and treatment (pp. 65–88). Safer Society Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118094822
44.
MeijerE. H.VerschuereB.MerckelbachH. L. G. J.CrombezG. (2008). Sex offender management using the polygraph: A critical review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(5), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.007
45.
MillerS. D.DuncanB. L.SorrellR.BrownG. S.ChalkM. B. (2006). Using outcome to inform therapy practice. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5(1), 5–22.
46.
NorcrossJ. C. (2011). Conclusions and recommendations of the interdivisional (APA divisions 12 & 29) Task Force on evidence-based therapy relationships. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e740432011-001
47.
NorcrossJ. C.WampoldB. E. (2010). Adapting the relationship to the individual patient. In NorcrossJ. C. (Ed.), Evidence-based therapy relationships (pp. 27–33). National Registry of Evidence-based Programmes and Practices. https://www.ceunits.com/trainings/175/CEU_pdf_175.pdf#page=29
48.
OdumJ. E.BusbyT. L.NelsonR. (2016). Polygraph in civil commitment programs for sexually violent predators. Polygraph, 45(1), 57–73.
49.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
50.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2009). Therapeutic responses of psychopathic sexual offenders: Treatment attrition, therapeutic change, and long-term recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015001
51.
PascoeG. C. (1983). Patient satisfaction in primary health care: A literature review and analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6(3–4), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(83)90002-2
52.
RobertielloG.TerryK. J. (2007). Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(5), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2007.02.010
53.
SchneiderJ. E.JacksonR. L.AmbroziakG.D’OrazioD.FreemanN.HebertJ. (2018, October). Annual survey of sex offender civil commitment programs [Paper presentation]. Sex Offender Civil Commitment Programs Network Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
54.
SelkerH.GrossmannC.AdamsA.GoldmannD.DeziiC.MeyerG.RogerV.SavitzL.PlattR. (2011). The common rule and continuous improvement in health care: A learning health system perspective. NAM perspectives [Discussion paper]. National Academy of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.31478/201110a
55.
SitziaJ.WoodN. (1998). Response rate in patient satisfaction research: An analysis of 210 published studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10(4), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311
56.
SmithD.RocheE.O’LoughlinK.BrennanD.MadiganK.LyneJ.FeeneyL.O’DonoghueB. (2014). Satisfaction with services following voluntary and involuntary admission. Journal of Mental Health, 23(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2013.841864
57.
SwansonC. K.GarwickG. B. (1990). Treatment for low-functioning sex offenders: Group therapy and interagency coordination. Mental Retardation, 28(3), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEBU.0000043330.65936.66
58.
ThorntonD.BludL. (2007). The influence of psychopathic traits on response to treatment. In HervéH.YuilleJ. C. (Eds.), The psychopath: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 505–539). Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
ThorntonD.MannR. E.WilliamsF. M. S. (2000). Therapeutic style in sex offender treatment [Unpublished paper]. HM Prison Service.
60.
TilsenJ.McNameeS. (2015). Feedback informed treatment: Evidence-based practice meets social construction. Family Process, 54(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12111
61.
TryonG. S.BirchS. E.VerkuilenJ. (2018). Meta-analyses of the relation of goal consensus and collaboration to psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000170
62.
WampoldB. E.MondinG. W.MoodyM.StichF.BensonK.AhnH. N. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes.”Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.122.3.203
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
