A literature review was conducted to evaluate the research findings regarding the use of polygraphy with sexual offenders. Inconsistent empirical data from various studies provide a challenge to the validity and reliability of the polygraph procedure. Treatment program utility was nonetheless enhanced by the disclosures made during the preparation process before the actual examination. Empirically based standards for the use and interpretation of polygraph results were found to be lacking. Guidelines for the responsible use of polygraphy in community-based treatment for sexual offenders are proposed. Finally, issues needing further research are identified.
Abel, G. (1994). Abel assessment for interest in paraphilias. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA), San Francisco, CA, Oct.
2.
Abrams, S. (1989). The complete polygraph handbook. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
3.
Abrams, S. (1991). The use of polygraphy with sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 239-263.
4.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers ( 1993). The ATSA practitioner's handbook. Beaverton, OR: Author.
5.
Backster, C. (1969). Technique fundamentals of the tri-zone polygraph test. San Diego, CA: Backster School of Lie Detection.
6.
Blasingame, G. (1994). Sexual offender rehabilitative treatment: Program manual. Redding, CA: SORT Program .
7.
Brett, A., Phillips, M., & Beary, J. (1986). Predictive power of the polygraph: Can the "lie detector" really detect liars?Lancet, March, 544-547.
8.
Edson, C. (1991). Sex offender treatment. Medford , OR: Department of Corrections.
9.
Emerick, R., & Dutton, W. (1993). The effect of polygraphy on the self report of adolescent sex offenders: Implications for risk assessment. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 83-103.
10.
Hess, C. (undated). Observations regarding the effects of specific drugs on polygraph tracings. San Diego, CA: Backster School of Lie Detection.
11.
Horvath, F. (1977). The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records. Joumal of Applied Psychology, 62, 127-136.
12.
Howes, R. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 7, 9-24.
13.
Janes, B. (1993). Polygraph: A current perspective. Interchange, June. Denver, CO: National Adolescent Perpetrator Network.
14.
Knopp, F.H., Freeman-Longo, R., & Stevenson, W. (1994). Nationwide survey of juvenile and adult sex-offender treatment programs and models. Orwel, VTSafer Society Press.
15.
Lundell, R., & Holmes, S. (1993). Polygraph handbook for probation/parole officers and treatment providers. Medford, OR: Polygraph Associates of Oregon.
16.
National Task Force on Juvenile Sexual Offending (1993). The revised report from the National Task Force on Juvenile Sexual Offending, 1993, of the National Adolescent Perpetrator Network. Reno, NV: Juvenile and Family Court Journal.
17.
Raskin, D., Barland, G., & Podlesny, J. (1976). Validity and reliability of detection of deception . (Contract 75-NI-99-0001, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, U.S. Department of Justice). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
18.
Schwartz, B., & Cellini, H. (1995). The sex offender: Corrections, treatment and legal practice. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
