Pedophilic interest is a central risk factor for sexual offending against children. Multiple measures exist to assess pedophilic interest, and the present study aims to provide validity evidence for three of these measures in a sample of men convicted of sexual offenses. The association between a phallometric test for pedophilic interest, the Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interest (SSPI), and the sexual deviance factor of the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offense (VRS-SO) version was examined in a sample of 261 men who participated in sexual violence reduction services. The association between these measures and sexual recidivism, both as sole predictors and while controlling for static risk, was also assessed. The second aim of the study was to examine the validity of different methods for modeling the distribution of pedophilic interests, using phallometric test scores, based on the findings in recent taxometric research. The measures generally showed a positive and moderate relationship with each other and predicted sexual recidivism. However, the SSPI did not significantly predict sexual recidivism, and when controlling for static risk, only the VRS-SO Sexual Deviance factor significantly predicted this outcome. Modeling phallometric test scores continuously and trichotomously produced significant associations with sexual recidivism; however, only a trichotomous model with two levels remained predictive after controlling for static risk. The results are broadly supportive of measures of pedophilic interest and underscore the importance of appropriately modeling the latent structure of pedophilic interest.
BabchishinK. M.NunesK. L.HermannC. A. (2013). The validity of Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0022-8
2.
BeckerJ. V.SteinR. M.KaplanM. S.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1992). Erection response characteristics of adolescent sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 5, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329200500202
3.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual offender version. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210369014
4.
BeierK. M. (1998). Differential typology and prognosis for dissexual behavior—A follow-up study of previously expert-appraised child molesters. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 111, 133–141.
5.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ.HansonR. K. (2018). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse, 30, 676–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217691965
6.
CanalesD. D.OlverM. E.WongS. C. (2009). Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale—Sexual offender version for measuring sexual deviance. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209344990
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
EherR.OlverM. E.HeurixI.SchillingF.RettenbergerM. (2015). Predicting reoffense in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000144
10.
EherR.RettenbergerM.MatthesA.SchillingF. (2010). Stable dynamic risk factors in child sexual abusers: The incremental predictive power of narcissistic personality traits beyond the Static-99/Stable-2007 priority categories on sexual reoffense. Sexual Offender Treatment, 5, 1–12.
11.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.ScottT. L.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
12.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
13.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421
14.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333
15.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.ThorntonD.BabchishinK. M.HarrisA. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1148–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812443648
16.
HelmusL.CiardhaCSetoM. C. (2014). The Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI): Construct, predictive, and incremental validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000099
17.
HelmusL.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951
18.
HowesR. J. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254871
19.
HunterJ. A.GoodwinD. W. (1992). The clinical utility of satiation therapy with juvenile sexual offenders: Variations and efficacy. Annals of Sex Research, 5, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849732
20.
MacCallumR. C.ZhangS.PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.19
21.
MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M. (2000). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Limits to its value. Clinical Psychological Review, 20, 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00013-6
22.
McGrathR. E. (2008). Inferential errors in taxometric analyses of ordered three-class constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701356755
23.
McGrathR. E.WaltersG. D. (2012). Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure. Psychological Methods, 17, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026973
24.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management. Safer Society Press.
25.
McPhailI. V.HermannC. A.FernaneS.FernandezY. M.NunesK. L.CantorJ. M. (2019). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 26, 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139
26.
McPhailI. V.OlverM. E.Brouillette-AlarieS.LoomanJ. (2018). Taxometric analysis of the latent structure of pedophilic interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 2223–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1225-4
27.
MouldenH. M.FirestoneP.KingstonD.BradfordJ. (2009). Recidivism in pedophiles: An investigation using different diagnostic methods. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903174055
28.
OlverM. E.EherR. (2019). Predictive properties and factor structure of the VRS-SO in an Austrian sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000551
29.
OlverM. E.NeumannC. S.KingstonD. A.NicholaichukT. P.WongS. C. P. (2018). Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version instrument in a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders. Assessment, 25, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116643819
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
32.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
33.
RuscioJ.HaslamN.RuscioA. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
RuscioJ.RuscioA. M. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological assessment: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102091002
35.
SchmidtA. F.BabchishinK. M.LehmannR. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of viewing time measures of sexual interest in children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3
36.
SchmidtA. F.MokrosA.BanseR. (2013). Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033326
37.
SetoM. C. (2018). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
38.
SetoM. C.CantorJ. M.BlanchardR. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610
39.
SetoM. C.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.BarbareeH. E. (2004). The Screening Scale for pedophilic interests and recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037426.55935.9c
40.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320101300103
41.
SetoM. C.SandlerJ. C.FreemanN. J. (2017). The revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2): Concurrent and predictive validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29, 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215618375
42.
StephensS.CantorJ. M.GoodwillA. M.SetoM. C. (2017). Multiple indicators of sexual interest in prepubescent or pubescent children as predictors of sexual recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85, 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000194
43.
StephensS.LerouxE.SkillingT.CantorJ. M.SetoM. C. (2017). Taxometric analyses of pedophilia utilizing self-report, behavioral, and sexual arousal indicators. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000291
WallerN. G.MeehlP. E. (1998). Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua. SAGE.
46.
WaltersG. D.McGrathR. E.KnightR. A. (2010). Taxometrics, polytomous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: A Monte Carlo analysis. Psychological Assessment, 22, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017819
47.
WilsonR. J.AbracenJ.LoomanJ.PichecaJ. E.FergusonM. (2011). Pedophilia: An evaluation of diagnostic and risk prediction methods. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384277
48.
WongS. C. P.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. E. (2003–2017). The Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO). Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
