Empathy has an important role in promoting proper societal functions. Those who violate societal functions, such as those convicted of having committed a criminal offense, are theorized to possess deficits in their empathic capacity. This assumption has been adopted by many criminological models, including for individuals convicted of a sexual offense (ICSO). However, contradictory research results have resulted in conflicting theories regarding the level of empathy within ICSO. This meta-analysis compiled available data to provide empirical clarity in a divided theoretical field. Results of the meta-analysis indicate that ICSO have lower levels of cognitive (Hedges’s g = −.303, p = .007) and general empathy (Hedges’s g = −.188, p = .020) than those in the general population but do not have significantly lower levels of affective empathy (Hedges’s g = .023, p = .849). Several moderator analyses were conducted, including type of sexual offense, assessment instrument used, and age at conviction.
AllisonC.Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. J.StoneM. H.MuncerS. J. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 829-835. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.005
2.
BarkerR. L. (2008). The social work dictionary. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
3.
BarnettG.MannR. E. (2013). Empathy deficits and sexual offending: A model of obstacles to empathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 228-239. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.010
4.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger’s syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 163-175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
5.
BastiaansenJ. A.ThiouxM.NanettiL.van der GaagC.KetelaarsC.MinderaaR.KeysersC. (2011). Age-related increase in inferior frontal gyrus activity and social functioning in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 832-838. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010. 11.007
6.
BeavinL. E. (2014). Oxytocin and empathy in sex offenders: A biological basis for deficiencies in empathic responding. Available from Proquest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 3631057)
7.
BekoffM. (2002). Empathy: Common sense, science sense, wolves, and well-being. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 26-27. doi:10.1017/s0140525x02280012
8.
BerkhoutE. T.MalouffJ. M. (2016). The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 32-41. doi:10.1037/cou0000093
9.
BlairR. J. R. (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 698-718. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
10.
BohartA. C.GreenbergL. S. (1997). Empathy and psychotherapy: An introductory overview. In BohartA. C.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 3-31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
BornsteinR. F. (2015). Personality assessment in the diagnostic manuals: On mindfulness, multiple methods, and test score discontinuities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 363-386. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1027346
12.
CarichM. S.MussackS. E. (2014). The safer society handbook of sexual abuser assessment and treatment. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society Press.
13.
ChaplinT. C.RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1995). Salient victim suffering and the sexual responses of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 249-255. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.249
CoutuW. (1951). Role-playing vs. role-taking: An appeal for clarification. American Sociological Review, 16, 180-187.
16.
CremerJ. M. (1996). Empathy and nurturance: A study of incest offenders. Available from Proquest Information & Learning. (UMI No. AAM 9634645)
17.
CuevasC. A. (2004). Obstacles to empathy in sex offenders: Recognition and interpretation of children’s emotional cues. Available from Proquest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 3129958)
18.
CuffB. M.BrownS. J.TaylorL.HowatD. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8, 144-153. doi:10.1177/1754073914558466
19.
DaddsM. R.HunterK.HawesD. J.FrostA. D. J.VassalloS.BunnP.. . . MasryY. E. (2008). A measure of cognitive and affective empathy in children using parent ratings. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 39, 111-122. doi:10.1007/s 10578-007-0075-4
20.
DandescuA.WolfeR. (2003). Considerations on fantasy use by child molesters and exhibitionists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 297-305. doi:10.1177/107906320301500406
21.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
DecetyJ. (2010). The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Developmental Neuroscience, 32, 257-267. doi:10.1159/000317771
24.
D’OrazioD. M. (2002). A comparative analysis of empathy in sexually offending and nonoffending juvenile and adult males. Available from Proquest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 3104307)
25.
DuanC.HillC. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261-274. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.261
26.
EllisP. L. (1982). Empathy: A factor in antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 123-134.
27.
EisenbergN.MillerP. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.101.1.91
28.
ErardR. E.EvansF. B. (2017). The Rorschach in multimethod forensic assessment: conceptual foundations and practical applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
FeshbachN. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 5, 25-30. doi:10.1177/001100007500500207
30.
FieldA. P.GillettR. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 665-694. doi:10.1348/000711010X502733
31.
FisherD.BeechA.BrowneK. (1999). Comparison of sex offenders to nonoffenders on selected psychological measures. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 473-491. doi:10.1177/0306624x99434006
32.
GeryI.MiljkovitchR.BerthozS.SoussignanR. (2009). Empathy and recognition of facial expressions of emotion in sex offenders, non-sex offenders and normal controls. Psychiatry Research, 165, 252-262. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.006
33.
GrahamS. A. (2003). Assessing emotional responses in sex offenders. Available from Proquest Information & Learning. (UMI No. AAI3081080)
34.
GuyattG. H.OxmanA. D.KunzR.WoodcockJ.BrozekJ.HelfandM.. . . SchünemannH. J. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—Inconsistency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 1294-1302.
35.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report No. 2004-02). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
36.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
37.
HayashinoD. S.WurteleS. K.KlebeK. J. (1995). Child molesters: An examination of cognitive factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 106-116. doi:10.1177/088626095010001007
38.
HeilbrunA. B. (1982). Cognitive models of criminal violence based upon intelligence and psychopathy levels. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 546-557. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.50.4.546
39.
HildebranD.PithersW. D. (1989). Enhancing offender empathy for sexual abuse victims. In LawsD. R. (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sexual offenders (pp. 236-243). London, England: Guilford Press.
40.
HockleyO. J.LangdonP. E. (2014). Men with intellectual disabilities with a history of sexual offending: Empathy for victims of sexual and non-sexual crimes. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59, 332-341. doi:10.1111/jir.12137
41.
HoffmanM. L. (1977). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In Howe, Jr.H. E.KeaseyC. B. (Eds.), Nebraska symposium of motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 169-217). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
42.
HoganR. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307-316. doi:10.1037/h0027580
43.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441-476. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001
44.
JonesJ. L. (2010). Attachment, empathy and psychopathy in a sex offending sample. Available from Proquest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 3428933)
45.
JongsmaA. E.PetersonL. M.BruceT. J. (2014). The complete adult psychotherapy treatment planner. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
46.
KnoppF. H.Freeman-LongoR.StevensonW. F. (1992). Nationwide survey of juvenile and adult sex offender treatment programs and models. Orwell, VT: Safer Society Press.
LawrenceE. J.ShawP.BakerD.Baron-CohenS.DavidA. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911-919. doi:10.1017/S0033291703001624
49.
LawsD. R.WardT. (2011). Desistance and sexual offending: Alternative to throwing away the keys. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
50.
LevensonJ. S.MacgowanM. J.MorinJ. W.CotterL. P. (2009). Perceptions of sex offenders about treatment: Satisfaction and engagement in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 35-56. doi:10.1177/1079063208326072
51.
LevensonJ. S.PrescottD. (2009). Treatment experiences of civilly committed sex offenders: A consumer satisfaction survey. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 6-20. doi:10.1177/1079063208325205
52.
LieberF. W. (1995). The legacy of empathy: History of a psychological concept. Available from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 9601791)
53.
LindgrenK. P.SchachtR. L.PantaloneD. W.BlayneyJ. A.GeorgeW. H. (2009). Sexual communication, sexual goals, and students’ transition to college: Implications for sexual assault, decision-making, and risky behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 491-503. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0095
54.
LindseyR. E.CarlozziA. F.EellsG. T. (2001). Differences in the dispositional empathy of juvenile sex offenders, non-sex-offending delinquent juveniles, and nondelinquent juveniles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 510-522. doi:10.1177/088626001016006002
LoQ. H. (2007). The relationship of self-compassion and self-esteem to empathy, shame, and social functioning in adolescents who offend sexually. Available from Proquest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. NR39509)
57.
MakA. S. (1991). Psychosocial control characteristics of delinquents and nondelinquents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 287-303. doi:10.1177/0093854891018003003
58.
MannR. E.BarnettG. D. (2013). Victim empathy intervention with sexual offenders: Rehabilitation, punishment, or correctional quackery?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 282-301. doi: 10.1177/1079063212455669
59.
MarshallW. L.HudsonS. M.JonesR.FernandezT. M. (1995). Empathy in sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 99-113. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(95)00002-7
60.
MarshallW. L.MaricA. (1996). Cognitive and emotional components of generalized empathy deficits in child molesters. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2, 1010-1110. doi:10.1300/J070v05n02_06
61.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.SerranG. A.FernandezY. M. (2006). Treating sexual offenders: An integrated approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
McDougallW. (1923). An introduction to social psychology. London, England: Methuen. (Original work published 1908)
63.
McGrathM.CannS.KonopaskyR. (1998). New measure of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Resilient Treatment, 10, 25-36. doi:10.1177/107906329801000104
64.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
MehrabianA. (1997). Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: Validational evidence bearing on the risk of eruptive violence scale. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 433-445. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1997)23:6<433::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-H
67.
MehrabianA.EpsteinN. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
68.
MokrosA.OsterheiderM.HuckerS. J.NitschkeJ. (2011). Psychopathy and sexual sadism. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 188-199. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9221-9
69.
MoriartyN.StoughC.TidmarshP.EgerD.DennisonS. (2001). Deficits in emotional intelligence underlying adolescent sex offending. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 743-751. doi:10.1006/jado.2001.0441
70.
MouldenH. M. (2008). Social competence and sexual aggression: Social intelligence, cognitive distortions, and victim empathy in men who sexually offend against children. Available from Proquest Dissertation Database. (UMI No. NR48408)
71.
MouldenH. M.MarshallW. L. (2001). Social intelligence, empathy, and aggression in sexual offenders. (Unpublished manuscript), Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
OrthopedagogiekM. (2014). A comparison study between male juvenile sex offenders and juvenile non-offenders regarding cognitive and affective empathy. Retrieved from http://www.scriptiesonline.uba.uva.nl/document/612425
74.
OxleyJ. C. (2011). The moral dimensions of empathy: Limits and applications in ethical theory and practice. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
75.
PickettL. A. (2006). Trait versus state empathy: Evaluating the stability of empathy and the relationship between negative affect and empathy in an incarcerated sex offender population. Available from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 3255336)
76.
PithersW. D. (1999). Empathy: Definition, enhancement and relevance to the treatment of sexual abusers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 257-284. doi:10.1177/088626099014003004
77.
PraszkierR. (2014). Empathy, mirror neurons and SYNC. Mind & Society, 15(1), 1-25. doi:10.1007/s11299-014-0160-X
78.
PrestonD.MurphyW. D. (1996). The Empathy Skills Questionnaire. (Unpublished manuscript), Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
79.
RandallP.CarrA.DooleyB.RooneyB. (2011). Psychological characteristics of Irish clerical sexual offenders. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 32, 4-13. doi:10.1080/03033910.2011.610191
80.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
81.
SingerT.LammC. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81-96. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x
82.
SkinnerB. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172. doi:10.1037/h0055873
83.
SturgeonC. L. (2004). Typology of violence and alexithymia, empathy, perfectionism, and substance abuse in federal offenders. Available from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. NQ82829)
84.
TideforsI.GouldingA.ArvidssonH. (2011). A Swedish sample of 45 adolescent males who have sexually offended. Nordic Psychology, 63, 18-34. doi:10.1027/1901-2276/a000043
85.
TierneyD. W.McCabeM. P. (2001). An evaluation of self-report measures of cognitive distortions and empathy among Australian sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 495-519. doi:10.1023/A:1010239217517
86.
TitchenerE. B. (1909). Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought-processes. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
87.
VarkerT.DevillyG. J. (2007). Types of empathy and adolescent sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 139-149. doi:10.1080/13552600701661573
88.
WakelingH. C.WebsterS. D.MannR. E. (2005). Sexual offenders’ treatment experience: A qualitative and quantitative investigation. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 171-186. doi:10.1080/13552600412331321323
89.
WallaceB. C.DahabrehI. J.TrikalinosT. A.LauJ.TrowP.SchmidC. H. (2012). Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. Journal of Statistical Software, 49(5), 1-15. doi:10.18637/jss.v049.i05
90.
WardT.DurrantR. (2013). Altruism, empathy, and sex offender treatment. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8, 66-71. doi:10.1037/h0100986
91.
WattM. C.FrausinS.DixonJ.NimmoS. (2000). Moral intelligence in a sample of incarcerated females. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 330-355. doi:10.1177/0093854800027003004
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
