The aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the German version of the revised Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG), the VRAG-R. Therefore, VRAG-R ratings were made retrospectively in an Austrian sample of 534 individuals convicted of a sexual offense who were followed up with an average of 7.62 years. The VRAG-R showed large effect sizes for the predictive accuracy of violent (AUC = .75) and general recidivism (AUC = .78) and significant but rather small effect sizes (AUC = .63 and .61, respectively) in predicting any sexual and sexual contact recidivism. Furthermore, for the prediction of violent recidivism but not for sexual recidivism the VRAG-R was incrementally predictive beyond the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) and the Static-99. Finally, the VRAG-R absolute recidivism rates for the risk bins showed satisfactory calibration properties. Taken together, the results of the present study support the cross-national utility of the VRAG-R and its use in applied risk assessment settings also in German-speaking countries.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C.LangtonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521. doi:10.1177/009385480102800406
3.
BartoshD. L.GarbyT.LewisD.GrayS. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 422-438. doi:10.1177/0306624X03253850
4.
BlairP. R.MarcusD. K.BoccacciniM. T. (2008). Is there an allegiance effect for assessment instruments? Actuarial risk assessment as an exemplar. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 346-360. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00147.x
5.
BoerD. P.HaavenJ. L.LambrickF.LindsayW. R.McVillyK.SakdalanJ.FrizeM. (2012). ARMIDILO-S manual: Web version 1.0. Retrieved from www.armidilo.net/index.html
6.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Institute Against Family Violence.
7.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
8.
CoidJ. W.YangM.UllrichS.ZhangT. Q.SizmurS.FarringtonD.RogersR. (2011). Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 3-21. doi:10.1080/14789949.2010.495990
9.
Council of Europe Member States (2014). Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers to Member States (Counsel of Europe) Concerning Dangerous Offenders. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=2163607&Site=CM
10.
DeLongE. R.DeLongD. M.Clarke-PearsonD. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837-845. doi:10.2307/2531595
11.
DucroC.PhamT. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15-26. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9003-6
12.
EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 5-28. doi:10.1177/1079063211403164
13.
EherR.RettenbergerM.HirtenlehnerH.SchillingF. (2012). Dimensionale Struktur und prognostische Relevanz der PCL-R in einer Population österreichischer Sexualstraftäter [Factorial structure and predictive validity of the PCL-R in an Austrian sexual offender population]. Monatsschrift Für Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform, 95, 235-251.
14.
EtzlerS.EherR.RettenbergerM. (2018). Dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Validity and dimensional structure of the Stable-2007. Assessment, 27(4), 822-839. doi:10.1177/1073191118754705
GloverA. J. J.ChurcherF. P.GrayA. L.MillsJ. F.NicholsonD. E. (2017). A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide—Revised (VRAG–R) within a correctional sample. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 507-518. doi:10.1037/lhb0000257
17.
GroveW. M.MeehlP. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
18.
HanleyJ. A.McNeilB. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29-36. doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
19.
HansonR. K. (2017). Assessing the calibration of actuarial risk scales: A primer on the E/O Index. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 26-39. doi:10.1177/0093854816683956
20.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6-35. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001002
21.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.ScottT.-L.HelmusL. M. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offender on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project (Corrections Research User Report 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
22.
HansonR. K.HelmusL. M.ThorntonD. (2010). Predicting recidivism amongst sex offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 198-211. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9180-1
23.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sex offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1-21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
24.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119-136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333
25.
HareR. D. (2003). Manual for the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, Otario, Canada: Multi Health Systems.
26.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 198-210. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07306.x
27.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2007). Characterizing the value of actuarial violence risk assessments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1638-1658. doi:10.1177/0093854807307029
28.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335. doi:10.1177/0093854893020004001
29.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.CormierC. A. (2015). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
HawesS. W.BoccacciniM. T.MurrieD. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Psychological Assessment, 25, 233-243. doi:10.1037/a0030391
31.
HelmusL. M.BabchishinK. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 8-25. doi:10.1177/0093854816678898
32.
HelmusL. M.ThorntonD. (2015). Stability and predictive and incremental accuracy of the individual items of Static-99R and Static-2002R in predicting sexual recidivism: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 917-937. doi:10.1177/0093854814568891
33.
HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
34.
HosmerD. W.LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley.
35.
HunsleyJ.MeyerG. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446-455. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
36.
KroppP. R.HartS. D.WebsterC. D.EavesD. (1995). Manual for the spousal assault risk assessment guide (2nd ed.). Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
37.
LilienfeldS. O.JonesM. K. (2008). Allegiance effects in assessment: Unresolved questions, potential explanations, and constructive remedies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 361-365. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00148.x
38.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
39.
MokrosA.VohsK.HabermeyerE. (2014). Psychopathy and violent reoffending in German-speaking countries: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 117-129. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000178
40.
OlverM. E.SewallL. (2018). Cross-validation of the discrimination and calibration properties of the VRAG-R in a treated sexual offender sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 741-761. doi:10.1177/0093854818762483
41.
ParentG.GuayJ. P.KnightR. A. (2011). An assessment of long-term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: One size doesn’t fit all. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 188-209. doi:10.1177/0093854810388238
42.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
QuinseyV. L.LalumièreM. L.RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1995). Predicting sexual offenses. In CampbellJ. (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sex offenders, batterers, and child molesters (pp. 114-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
RettenbergerM.BrikenP.TurnerD.EherR. (2015). Sexual offender recidivism among a population-based prison sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 424-444. doi:10.1177/0306624X13516732
46.
RettenbergerM.CraigL. A. (2016). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders. In CraigL. A.RettenbergerM. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the theories, assessment, and treatment of sexual offending–Volume II: Assessment (pp. 609-641). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
47.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2007). Predicting reoffense in sexual offender subtypes: A prospective validation study of the German version of the Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Sexual Offender Treatment, 2(2), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=62&type=123
48.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2013). Actuarial risk assessment in sexually motivated intimate-partner violence. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 75-86. doi:10.1037/b0000001
RettenbergerM.Haubner-MacLeanT.EherR. (2013). The contribution of age to the Static-99 risk assessment in a population-based prison sample of sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 1413-1433. doi:10.1177/0093854813492518
51.
RettenbergerM.MatthesA.BoerD. P.EherR. (2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment: A comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169-186. doi:10.1177/0306624X08328755
52.
RettenbergerM.RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.EherR. (2017). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Psychological Assessment, 29, 624-638. doi:10.1037/pas0000390
53.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.737
54.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241. doi:10.1023/A:1024882430242
55.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
56.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2016). The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide. In PhenixA.HobermanH. M. (Eds.), Sexual offending: Predisposing antecedents, assessments and management (pp. 471-488). New York, NY: Springer.
57.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.LangC. (2013). Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide—Revised (VRAG-R). Psychological Assessment, 25, 951-965. doi:10.1037/a0032878
58.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.LangC.CormierC. (2006). Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records?Law and Human Behavior, 30, 525-541. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9022-3
59.
SalekinR. T.RogersR.SewellK. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist and psychopathy checklist-revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00071.x
60.
SinghJ. P.DesmaraisS. L.HurducasC.Arbach-LucioniK.CondemarinC.DeanK.. . . OttoR. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 193-206. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
61.
TullyR. J.ChouS.BrowneK. D. (2013). A systematic review on the effectiveness of sex offender risk assessment tools in predicting sexual recidivism of adult male sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 287-316. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.12.002
62.
WongS. C. P.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale—Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
63.
WongS. C. P.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2017). The Violence Risk Scale—Sexual Offense version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
