Moffitt’s (1993) developmental theory has garnered an extensive amount of attention from scholars across a range of disciplines, and the results generated from this body of literature have been consistently supportive. Specifically, the segment of the population predicted by Moffitt to be chronically aggressive—called life-course persistent offenders—has been found to account for a disproportionate number of serious crimes. What remains less certain, however, is whether this same group of offenders are also responsible for perpetrating acts of forced sex. The authors examined the tendency for life-course persisters to sexually assault using a nationally representative sample of individuals. Our findings suggest that life-course persisters are disproportionately more likely to be sexually coercive compared to other individuals.
BarnesJ. C.BeaverK. M. (2010). An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: A direct test of Moffitt’s maturity gap thesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1176-1185.
2.
BarnesJ. C.BeaverK. M.BoutwellB. B. (2011). Examining the genetic underpinnings to Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy: A behavioral genetic analysis. Criminology, 49, 923-54.
3.
BeaverK. M.DeLisiM.VaughnM. G.WrightJ. P. (2010). The intersection of genes and neuropsychological deficits in the prediction of adolescent delinquency and self-control. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 22-42.
4.
BeaverK. M.VaughnM. G.DeLisiM.HigginsG. E. (2010). The biosocial correlates of neuropsychological deficits: Results from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 878-894.
5.
BouffardL. A. (2010). Exploring the utility of entitlement in understanding sexual aggression. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 870-879.
6.
BoutwellB. B.BeaverK. M. (2008). A biosocial explanation of delinquency abstention. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18, 59-74.
7.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
8.
CaleJ.LussierP. (2012) Merging developmental and criminal career perspectives: Implications for risk assessment and risk prediction of violent/sexual recidivism in adult sexual aggressors of women. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 107-132.
9.
DeLisiM. (2001). Extreme career criminals. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 239-252.
10.
DeLisiM.PiqueroA. R. (2011). New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000-2011: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 289-301.
11.
DeLisiM.VaughnM. G.BeaverK. M.WrightJ. P.HochstetlerA.KosloskiA. E.DruryA. J. (2008). Juvenile sex offenders and institutional misconduct: The role of thought psychopathology. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18, 292-305.
12.
FranklinC. A. (2010a). The effect of victim attitudes and behaviors on sexual assault victimization severity: An examination of university women. Women & Criminal Justice, 20, 239-262.
13.
FranklinC. A. (2010b). Physically forced, alcohol-induced, and verbally coerced sexual victimization: Assessing risk factors among university women. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 149-159.
14.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
15.
HarrisK. M. (2009). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994-1996; Wave III, 2001-2002; Wave IV, 2007-2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
16.
KossM. P.BacharK. J.HopkinsC. Q.CarlsonC. (2004). Expanding a community’s justice response to sex crimes through advocacy, prosecutorial, and public health collaboration: Introducing the RESTORE program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1435-1463.
17.
LalumièreM. L.HarrisG. T.QuinseyV. L.RiceM. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
18.
LarssonH.AndershedH.LichtensteinP. (2006). A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 221-230.
19.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
20.
MoffittT. E. (2006). A review of research on the taxonomy of life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 277-311). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
21.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355-375.
22.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.DicksonN.SilvaP. A.StantonW. (1996). Childhood-onset versus adolescent-onset antisocial conduct in males: Natural history from age 3 to 18. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 399-424.
23.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.HarringtonH.MilneB. J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179-207.
24.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.RutterM.SilvaP. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
NaginD.LandK. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327-362.
26.
PinkerS. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York, NY: Penguin.
RheeS. H.WaldmanI. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490-529.
29.
RushtonJ. P.TemplerD. I. (2009). National differences in intelligence, crime, income, and skin color. Intelligence, 37, 341-346.
30.
StrausM. A.Luis RamirezI. (2004). Criminal history and assault of dating partners: The role of type of prior crime, age of onset, and gender. Violence and Victims, 19, 413-434.
31.
‘t Hart-KerkhoffsL. A.VermeirenR. R. J. M.JansenL. M. C.DoreleijersT. A. H. (2011). Juvenile group sex offenders: A comparison of group leaders and followers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3-20.
32.
TellisK. M.SpohnC. C. (2008). The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 252-261.
33.
ThornhillR.PalmerC. (2000). An natural history of rape. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
TillyerM. S.WilcoxP.GialopsosB. M. (2010). Adolescent school-based sexual victimization: Exploring the role of opportunity in a gender-specific multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1071-1081.
35.
TurnerM. G.HartmanJ. L.BishopD. M. (2007). The effects of prenatal problems, family functioning, and neighborhood disadvantage in predicting life-course-persistent offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1241-61.
36.
VaughnM. G.DeLisiM.GunterT.FuQ.BeaverK. M.PerronB. E.HowardM. O. (2011). The severe 5%: A latent class analysis of the externalizing behavior spectrum in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 75-80.
37.
VaughnM. G.FuQ.WernetS. J.DeLisiM.BeaverK. M.PerronB. E.HowardM. O. (2011). Characteristics of abstainers from substance use and antisocial behavior in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 212-217.
38.
WidmanL.McNultyJ. K. (2010). Sexual narcissism and the perpetration of sexual aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 926-939.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
