BACKGROUND: Many individuals who are hospitalized on psychiatric units are at high risk of suicide. Among the strategies commonly recommended for suicide prevention is the negotiation of a no-suicide or no-harm contract. In spite of the conventional acceptance of no-suicide contracts, there is little research about this intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To
describe
the
use
of
no-suicide contracts in inpatient settings including
the frequency of
their use,
the
circumstances under
which they
are negotiated and
the form of
contracts.
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive survey.
RESULTS:
No-suicide
contracts were
used
by 79% (n = 66) of the
hospitals
(N = 84).
Contracts
were generally
negotiated after suicidal ideation was expressed
(83%
[n
=
54]
of
those hospitals that use contracts), after
self-harm
(79%,
n
= 51),
or after a patient
who
made
a
suicidal
gesture
or
attempt
was admitted
(65%/,
n
= 42).
In all but one hos-
pital,
nurses negotiated contracts
with
patients. Contracts
were
usually
verbal (74%/,
n = 48)
or handwritten (72%,
n = 47)
rather than
preprinted
(15%,
n =
10). Fifty-three
percent of the respondents estimated more than 10 incidents of suicidal behavior by inpatients per year.
CONCLUSIONS:
Suicidal behaviors
occurred in hospital settings at a rate that is clinically significant. No-suicide contracting is a common nursing practice in psychiatric inpatient settings in Ohio. Contracts are not indiscriminately used but are negotiated when high suicide risk is assessed.