BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for morbid obesity is becoming an increasingly sought out intervention for weight loss. Bariatric surgery is a life-changing procedure that requires a long-term commitment from the individual. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to explore issues relating to having a surgical procedure performed to lose weight. STUDY DESIGN: A phenomenological study was conducted. The sample included five females and three males who had undergone surgery to reduce weight at least 1 year prior to the study participation. RESULTS: Qualitative data analysis revealed the following four themes: last resort, surgery provides structure, reality setsin, and positive about the decision to have the surgery. CONCLUSION: Understanding these themes offers much needed information for health professionals when treating the morbidly obese person. Psychiatric nurses and psychiatric advanced practice nurses can offer a holistic approach and implement programs that incorporate study findings into individual treatment plans. Nurse psychotherapists can explore these findings in therapy sessions and focus on the impact they have on the person’s goals to maintain weight loss.
American Society for Bariatric Surgery. (n.d.). Guidelines for patient selection and postoperative follow-up care in surgical treatment of obesity. Gainesville, FL: Author.
2.
American Society for Bariatric Surgery. (2001). Rationale for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity updated November 29, 2001. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from http://www.asbs.org/html/rationale/ratioinale.html
3.
American Society for Bariatric Surgery. (2002a). The story of surgery for obesity. Kremen, Linner, and other early pioneers (Chap. 1). Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.asbs.org/htm/story/chapter1.html
4.
American Society for Bariatric Surgery. (2002b). The Mason era (Chap. 4). Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.asbs.org/htm/story/chapter4.html
5.
Bogdan, R. C., & Bilken, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6.
Bray, G. A. (2004). Classification and evaluation of the overweight patient. In G. A. Bray & C. Bouchard (Eds.), Handbook of obesity. Clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 1-32). New York: Marcel Dekker.
7.
Calle, E. E., Rodriguez, C., Walker-Thurmond, K., & Thun, M. J. (2003). Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1625-1638.
8.
Calle, E. E., Thun, M. J., Petrelli, J. M., Rodriguez, C., & Heath, C. W. (1999). Body mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1097-1105.
9.
Deitel, M., & Shikora, S. S. (2002). The development of the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 21, 365-371.
10.
Elliott, V. S. (2004, June 28). Bariatric surgery patients need care for a lifetime. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from http://www.amaassn.org/amednews/2004/06/28/hlsa0628.htm
11.
Fabricatore, A. N., & Wadden, T. A. (2003). Psychological functioning of obese individuals. Diabetes Spectrum, 16, 245-252.
12.
Ferraro, D. R. (2004, January). Preparing patients for bariatric surgery. Clinician Reviews, pp. 58-63.
13.
Fisher, B., & Schauer, P. (2002). Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. American Journal of Surgery, 184(6B), 9S-16S.
14.
Harvey, J. H., & Weary, G. (1981). Perspectives on attributional processes. Dubuque, IA: Wm C. Brown.
15.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Hunter, M., & Barker, G. (1987). “If at first...”: Attribution theory in the classroom. Education leadership. Journal of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 45(2), 51-53.
17.
Institute of Medicine. (1995). Weighing the options: Criteria for evaluating weight-management programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
Jain, A. (2004). What works for obesity? A summary of the research behind obesity interventions. London: BMJ.
19.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (n.d.-a). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—Executive summary. Clinical guidelines. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/sum_clin.htm
20.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (n.d.-b). Evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults slide show.Retrieved August 31, 2004, from http://hin.nhlbi.nih.gov/oei_ss/menu.htm%20and%20http://nhlbi.nih.gov/oei_ss/backl_l.htm
21.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (n.d.-c). Summary of evidence based recommendation. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/sum_rec.htm
22.
National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases. (2001a, December). Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity [NIH Publication No. 01-4006]. Retrieved on November 22, 2004, from http://win.niddk.nih.gov/publications/gastric.htm%23whatare
23.
National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases. (2001b, December 13). Surgeon General’s “Call to Action”—Over-weight and obesity threaten U.S. health gains. Retrieved July 27, 2002, from http://www.niddk.nih.gov/welcome/releases/12-13-01.htm
24.
National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Panel. (1993). Methods for voluntary weight loss and control: Technology assessment conference statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119, 764-770.
25.
New York Health Plan Association. (n.d.). Bariatric surgery primer. Food for thought [Obesity surgery project]. Albany, NY: Author.
26.
Newman, C. (2004, August). Why are we so fat?National Geographic, pp. 46-61.
27.
Puhl, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2001). Obesity, bias, and discrimination. Obesity Research, 9, 788-805.
28.
Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2004). Bias, prejudice, discrimination, and obesity. In G. A. Bray & C. Bouchard (Eds.), Handbook of obesity. Clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 69-74). New York: Marcel Dekker.
29.
Reinhold, R. B. (1994). Late results of gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. Journal of American College of Nutrition, 13, 326-331.
30.
Reto, C. S. (2003). Psychological aspects of delivering nursing care to the bariatric patient. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 26, 139-149.
31.
Sjostrom, L. (2004). Surgical treatment of obesity: An overview and results from the SOS study. In G. A. Bray & C. Bouchard (Eds.), Handbook of obesity. Clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 359-389). New York: Marcel Dekker.
32.
Stunkard, A. J., & Wadden, T. A. (1992). Psychological aspects of severe obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 55, 524S-532S.
33.
Wadden, T. A., Sternberg, J. A., Letizia, K. A., Stunkard, A. J., & Foster, G. D. (1989). Treatment of obesity by very-low-calorie diet, behavior therapy and their combination: A five-year perspective. International Journal of Obesity, 51, 167-172.
34.
Wilson, G. T. (1994). Behavioral treatment of obesity: Thirty years and counting. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 31-75.
35.
Wysoker, A. (2001). Women’s experiences losing weight and gaining the lost weight back (Doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University, 1991), Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(05B), 2505-2505, 00250-00250.
36.
Wysoker, A. (2002). A conceptual model of weight loss and weight regain. An intervention for change. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 8, 168-173.
