Scholars continue to debate whether ideology shapes Canadian municipal politics, yielding mixed results. To test this argument further, I conducted a survey experiment on over 700 municipal officials through the Canadian Municipal Barometer. Based on their self-reported ideology, respondents were randomly assigned to one of three groups: an ideologically congruent province, an ideologically incongruent province, and a control group in which the ideology of the provincial government is omitted. Respondents then read a hypothetical prompt explaining that a newly elected provincial government plans to pass a series of environmental laws prohibiting municipalities from passing their own. Municipal officials facing intervention from an ideologically incongruent province were substantially more opposed to intervention. Moreover, municipal officials were significantly more likely to support being consulted—or being required to give their consent—when facing policy intervention from an ideologically incongruent province.
AndersonJames D.1972. “Non-partisan Urban Politics in Canadian Cities.” In Emerging Party Politics in Urban Canada, edited by MassonJack K.AndersonJames D., 5–25. Toronto, ON: McLelland & Stewart.
ArtilesAlexandraWallnerJennifer. 2025. “Intergovernmental Relations and the Reducing Gridlock and Saving You Time Act: Data and Discussion.” Working paper.
BroockmanDavid E.SkovronChristopher. 2018. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review112 (3): 542–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000011.
7.
BunchJaclyn.2014. “Does Local Autonomy Enhance Representation? The Influence of Home Rule on County Expenditures.” State and Local Government Review46 (2): 106–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X14536589.
8.
BurnettCraig M.2017. “Parties as an Organizational Force on Non-Partisan City Councils.” Party Politics25 (4): 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817737996.
CliffordScottSheagleyGeoffreyPistonSpencer. 2021. “Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects: Repeated Measures Designs in Survey Experiments.” American Political Science Review115 (3): 1048–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000241.
12.
ConnollyJennifer M.MasonDyana P.. 2016. “Ideology and Local Public Expenditure Priorities.” Political Research Quarterly69 (4): 830–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916665702.
13.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyKushner GadarianShanaTrounstineJessica. 2019. “Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps.” Urban Affairs Review56 (1): 124–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419831074.
14.
CutlerFredMatthewsJ. Scott. 2005. “The Challenge of Municipal Voting: Vancouver 2002.” Canadian Journal of Political Science38 (2): 359–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423905040151.
15.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1124–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/686308.
16.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2019. “Politics in Forgotten Governments: The Partisan Composition of County Legislatures and County Fiscal Policies.” The Journal of Politics82 (2): 460–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/706458.
17.
DodeigneJeremyCloseCarolineTeuberFerdinand. 2021. “Nationalisation of Local Party Systems in Belgium (1976-2018).” Local Government Studies47 (1): 100–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1802251.
18.
East York v. Ontario. 1997. East York (Borough) et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General), (1997) 43 O.T.C. 287 (G.D.).
19.
EidelmanGabrielLucasJack. 2022. “How do Municipal Mayors and Councillors Communicate with Other Levels of Government? Evidence from a Multi-Level Survey of Canadian Elected Officials.” Canadian Public Administration66 (1): 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12510.
20.
EinsteinKatherin LevineGlickDavid M.. 2017. “Cities in American Federalism: Evidence on State-Local Government Conflict from a Survey of Mayors.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism47 (4): 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx026.
FischelWilliam A.2005. The Homevoter Hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
FowlerLukeKettlerJaclyn J.. 2021. “Are Republicans Bad for the Environment?” State Politics & Policy Quarterly21 (2): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440020941794.
25.
GendzwillAdamZoltakTomasz. 2014. “Why Do Non-Partisans Challenge Parties in Local Politics? The (Extreme) Case of Poland.” Europe-Asia Studies66 (7): 1122–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.927644.
26.
GerberElisabeth R.2013. “Partisanship and Local Climate Policy.” Cityscape (Washington, D C )15 (1): 107–24.
27.
GoodKristin.2019. “The Fallacy of the ‘Creatures of the Provinces’ Doctrine: Recognizing and Protecting Municipalities’ Constitutional Status.” IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance46 (2019): 1–37. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/98264.
28.
HopkinsDaniel J.2018. The Increasingly United States: How and why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
HopkinsDaniel J.SchicklerEricAziziDavid L.. 2022. “From Many Divides, One? The Polarization and Nationalization of American State Party Platforms, 1918-2017.” Studies in American Development36 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X22000013.
30.
KaplanHarold.1967. Urban Political Systems: A Functional Analysis of Metro Toronto. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
31.
KayBarry J.1971. “Voting Patterns in a Non-Partisan Legislature: A Study of Toronto City Council.” Canadian Journal of Political Science4 (2): 224–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900026652.
LucasJack.2019. “The Size and Sources of Municipal Incumbency Advantage in Canada.” Urban Affairs Review57 (2): 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419879234.
34.
LucasJack.. 2022a. “Do ‘Non-Partisan’ Municipal Politicians Match the Partisanship of Their Constituents?” Urban Affairs Review58 (1): 103–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420958074.
35.
LucasJack.. 2022b. “CMB 2022: Tracking Questions and Data Summary.” https://borealisdata.ca/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/LREVZR.
36.
LucasJack.2023. “The Ideological Structure of Municipal Non-Ideology.” Urban Affairs Review59 (1): 275–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211038321.
37.
LucasJack.. 2024a. Ideology in Canadian Municipal Politics. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
LucasJackArmstrongDavid A.. 2021. “Policy Ideology and Local Ideological Representation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science54 (4): 959–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423921000652.
40.
LucasJackMcGregorMichael. 2020. “Are City Elections Unique? Perceptions of Electoral Cleavages and Social Sorting Across Levels of Government.” Electoral Studies66 (3): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102165.
41.
LucasJackSmithAlison. 2020. “Municipalities in the Federation.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, edited by BakvisHermanSkogstadGrace, 427–52. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
42.
LucasJackMcGregorR. MichaelBridgmanAengus. 2023. “Spatial Voting in Non-Partisan Cities: A Case Study.” Electoral Studies82 (102599): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874241270067.
43.
MacartneyHughSingletonJohn D.. 2018. “School Boards and Student Segregation.” Journal of Public Economics164 (3): 165–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.011.
McGregorMichaelLucasJackErlChrisAndersonCameron D.. 2024. “Understanding Support for Municipal Political Parties: Evidence from Canada.” Urban Affairs Review60 (5): 1382–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874231224707.
46.
McGregorMichaelMooreAaron A.StephensonLaura B.. 2016. “Political Attitudes and Behaviour in a Non-Partisan Environment: Toronto 2014.” Canadian Journal of Political Science49 (2): 311–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423916000573.
PetersonPaul.1981. City Limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
SalmanAresh AlKoppBenjamin J.ThomasJacob E.RingDavidFetehiAmirrexa. 2020. “What Are the Priming and Ceiling Effects of One Experience Measure on Another?” Journal of Patient Experience7 (6): 1755–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951670.
53.
SchaffnerBrian F.StrebMatthew K.. 2002. “The Partisan Heuristic in Low-Information Elections.” The Public Opinion Quarterly66 (4): 559–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/343755.
54.
SmithAlisonSpicerZachary. 2018. “The Local Autonomy of Canada’s Largest Cities.” Urban Affairs Review54 (5): 931–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416684380.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press.
57.
SwindellDavidSvaraJamesStenbergCarl. 2018. “Local Government Options in the Era of State Preemption.” Local Government Review (July): 8–13.
58.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000318.
TrounstineJessica.2010. “Representation and Accountability in Cities.” Annual Review of Political Science13 (2010): 407–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.032808.150414.
61.
WalkerChadStephensonLauraBaxterJamie. 2018. “His Main Platform is ‘Stop the Turbines’: Political Discourse, Partisanship and Local Responses to Wind Energy in Canada.” Energy Policy123 (12): 670–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.046.
62.
WarshawChristopher.2019. “Local Elections and Representation in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science22 (2019): 461–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-071108.
63.
WynesSethDamon MatthewsH.. 2023. “Missing Density: Assessing Support for Compact Cities among Canadian Municipal Officials and Members of the Public.” Climate Policy23 (8): 1019–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2190870.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
