In this study, we examine how gentrification shapes the enforcement of residential parking permit violations while accounting for calls for service. And we consider if the relationship between calls for service and parking violations is contingent upon a given neighborhood's stage of gentrification. Using Washington, D.C. as a study site, we find that census block groups in early as opposed to late stages of gentrification tend to have the highest citation rates. And, this effect holds regardless of whether said block groups are located adjacent to those experiencing later stages of urban renewal. Moreover, the impact of calls for parking enforcement on citation activity varies by gentrification stage. Within early stage block groups, each additional increase in logged calls for service is associated with a 47% increase in citation activity.
ArancibiaDanielFarberStevenSavanBethVerlindenYvonneLeaNancy SmithAllenJeffVernichLee. 2019. “Measuring the Local Economic Impacts of Replacing On-Street Parking With Bike Lanes.” Journal of the American Planning Association85 (4): 463–81.
2.
BartlettRandall.2003. “Testing the ‘Popsicle Test’: Realities of Retail Shopping in New ‘Traditional Neighbourhood Developments’.” Urban Studies40 (8): 1471–85.
3.
BoivieIlana.2017. Lessons from the Waterfront: Economic Development Projects Must do More to Lessen DC's Worsening Income Inequality. Washington, DC: DC Fiscal Policy Institute.
4.
BrazilNoli.2020. “The Unequal Spatial Distribution of City Government Fines: The Case of Parking Tickets in Los Angeles.” Urban Affairs Review56 (3): 823–56.
5.
CameronA.ColinTrivediPravin. 2013. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press.
6.
CaoMengqiuHickmanRobin. 2018. “Car Dependence and Housing Affordability: An Emerging Social Deprivation Issue in London?” Urban Studies55 (10): 2088–105.
7.
CollinsCharles R.StuartForrestJanulisPatrick. 2022. “Policing Gentrification or Policing Displacement? Testing the Relationship Between Order Maintenance Policing and Neighbourhood Change in Los Angeles.” Urban Studies59 (2): 414–33.
DC Office of Planning. 2014. Creative Economy Strategy for the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development.
11.
FeikMichal.2022. “The Impact of car Transport on the Environment and Public Spaces in Cities: Case Study from Slovakia.” Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering30 (3): 43–52.
12.
FinioNicholas.2022. “Measurement and Definition of Gentrification in Urban Studies and Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature37 (2): 249–64.
13.
GaoJingqinXieKunOzbayKaan. 2018. “Exploring the Spatial Dependence and Selection Bias of Double Parking Citations Data.” Transportation Research Record2672 (42): 159–69.
14.
GlassRuth.1964. London: Aspects of Change. London, UK: MacGibbon & Kee.
15.
Golash-BozaTanyaOhHyunsuSalazarCarmen. 2022. “Broken Windows and Order-Maintenance Policing in Gentrifying Washington, DC.” Policing and Society 33 (2): 1–17.
16.
GolioA. J.2024. “What Makes Gentrification ‘White’? Theorizing the Mutual Construction of Whiteness and Gentrification in the Urban U.S.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City 5 (1): 48–72.
GösslingStefanHumpeAndreasHologaRafaelRiachNilsFreytagTim. 2022. “Parking Violations as an Economic Gamble for Public Space.” Transport Policy116: 248–57.
19.
Government of the District of Columbia. 2010. Creative Capital: The Creative DC Action Agenda. Washington, DC: DC Office of Planning and Washington, DC Economic Partnership.
20.
GrantJillPerrottKatherine. 2011. “Where Is the Café? The Challenge of Making Retail Uses Viable in Mixed-use Suburban Developments.” Urban Studies48 (1): 177–95.
21.
GuerrieriVeronicaHartleyDanielHurstErik. 2013. “Endogenous Gentrification and Housing Price Dynamics.” Journal of Public Economics100: 45–60.
22.
HarrisBrandonRigolonAlessandroFernandezMariela. 2020. ““To Them, We're Just Kids from the Hood”: Citizen-Based Policing of Youth of Color, “White Space,” and Environmental Gentrification.” Cities107: Article 102885.
23.
HelmuthAllison Suppan. 2019. ““Chocolate City, Rest in Peace”: White Space–Claiming and the Exclusion of Black People in Washington, DC.” City & Community18 (3): 746–69.
24.
HerringChris.2019. “Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space.” American Sociological Review84 (5): 769–800.
25.
HuebnerBethGuiffreAndrea. 2022. “Reinforcing the web of Municipal Courts: Evidence and Implications Post-Ferguson.” Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences8 (1): 108–27.
26.
HyraDerek S.2017. Race, Class, and Politics in the Cappuccino City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
JarmanNicholasStratfordElaine. 2024. “Whose Rights to the City? Parklets, Parking, and University Engagement in Urban Placemaking.” Australian Geographer54 (1): 115–36.
28.
KersteinRobert.1990. “Stage Models of Gentrification: An Examination.” Urban Affairs Quarterly25 (4): 620–39.
29.
KoohpaymaJavadTahooniAmirJelokhani-NiarakiMohammadrezaArsanjaniJamal Jokar. 2019. “Spatial Analysis of Curb-Park Violations and Their Relationship with Points of Interest: A Case Study of Tehran, Iran.” Sustainability11 (22): 6336.
LaniyonuAyobami.2018. “Coffee Shops and Street Stops: Policing Practices in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review54 (5): 898–930.
32.
LazoLuz.2023. “How 6 Million D.C. Traffic Tickets Went Unpaid.” Washington Post, May 11.
33.
MansonStevenSchroederJonathanVan RiperDavidKuglerTracyRugglesSteven. 2021. IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS.
34.
ManvilleMichaelPinskiMiriam. 2021. “The Causes and Consequences of Curb Parking Management.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice152: 295–307.
35.
MarusekSarah.2012. Politics of Parking: Rights, Identity, and Property. London, UK: Routledge.
36.
MoosMarkusVinodraiTaraRevingtonNickSeasonsMichael. 2018. “Planning for Mixed Use: Affordable for Whom?” Journal of the American Planning Association84 (1): 7–20.
37.
MoylanEmilySchabasMatthewDeakinElizabeth. 2014. “Residential Permit Parking: Better Off Without It?” Transportation Research Record2469 (1): 23–31.
PeckJamie.2005. “Struggling with the Creative Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29 (4): 740–70.
40.
RichardsonJasonMitchellBruceFrancoJuan. 2019. Shifting Neighborhoods: Gentrification and Cultural Displacement in American Cities. Washington, DC: National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
41.
SaitoLeland.2015. “From Whiteness to Colorblindness in Public Policies: Racial Formation and Urban Development.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity1 (1): 37–51.
42.
SancesMichael W.YouHye Young. 2017. “Who Pays for Government? Descriptive Representation and Exploitative Revenue Sources.” The Journal of Politics79 (3): 1090–4.
43.
SharpElaine B.2014. “Politics, Economics, and Urban Policing: The Postindustrial City Thesis and Rival Explanations of Heightened Order Maintenance Policing.” Urban Affairs Review50 (3): 340–65.
44.
ShoupDonaldYuanQuanJiangXin. 2017. “Charging for Parking to Finance Public Services.” Journal of Planning Education and Research37 (2): 136–49.
45.
TaylorElizabeth.2014. ““Fight the Towers! Or Kiss Your car Park Goodbye”: How Often do Residents Assert car Parking Rights in Melbourne Planning Appeals?” Planning Theory & Practice15 (3): 328–48.
46.
ThorpeAmelia.2020. Owning the Street: The Everyday Life of Property. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
TimbergCraig.2003. “Williams Aims to Be Mayor of a Bigger D.C.” The Washington Post, January 2.
48.
ToblerWaldo.2004. “On the First law of Geography: A Reply.” Annals of the Assocation of American Geographers94 (2): 304–10.
49.
WilliamsTeona.2021. “For “Peace, Quiet, and Respect”: Race, Policing, and Land Grabbing on Chicago’s South Side.” Antipode53 (2): 497–523.
50.
ZukMiriamBierbaumAriel H.ChappelKarenGorskaKarolinaLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2018. “Gentrification, Displacement, and the Role of Public Investment.” Journal of Planning Literature33 (1): 31–44.
51.
ZurHadas.2023. “Policing Temporality: Police Officers Reflect on the Role of the Police in Gentrifying a High-Crime Neighborhood.” Urban Affairs Review59 (3): 866–91.
