We interrogate the interrelations of race and gentrification in three Chicago neighborhoods of historical significance to Black, Mexican, and Puerto Rican residents. Our previous work indicates that historical legacies of structural racism mean that gentrification works differently in each area, although the extant literature has not directly addressed how race fuels local valuation regimes. For each neighborhood we provide GIS mapping of 30 years of property parcel data and Census block data on race, compared with a parcel level visual scan of material conditions in the built environment. Changes in value at the block level reveal value assigned to whiteness irrespective of material improvement and run counter to standard explanations of gentrification but closely align with a model of racial capitalism. We bridge the gap between qualitative and quantitative research by mapping the everyday life of racial change that is felt and known by residents of color in Chicago.
AndersonMatthewSternbergCarolina. 2013. “Non-White Gentrification in Chicago‘s Bronzeville and Pilsen: Racial Economy and the Intra-Urban Contingency of Neoliberal Redevelopment.” Urban Affairs Review49 (3): 435–67. doi:10.1177/1078087412465590.
2.
ArellanoCathy. 2016. Salvation on Mission Street. San Francisco: Korima Press.
3.
AtkinsonRowlandBridgeGary. 2005. Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism, 1–12. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BentacurJohnKimYoungjun. 2016. “The Trajectory and Impact of Ongoing Gentrification in Pilsen”, Nathalie P. Voorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement Report, University of Illinois at Chicago, https://voorheescenter.uic.edu/reports/ (accessed January 16, 2022).
BetancurJohn J.LeachmanMichaelMillerAnneWalkerDavidWrightPatricia A.. 1995. “Development Without Displacement: Task Force Background Paper”, Natalie P. Voorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement Report, University of Illinois at Chicago http://www.urbancentre.utoronto.ca/pdfs/curp/Chicago_Dev-without-Displac.pdf (accessed January 16, 2022).
7.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2010. The Gentrification Debates, 51–70. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
CaulfieldJohn. 1989. “Gentrification and Desire.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology26: 617–32. doi:10.1017/S082932010000541X.
CurranWinifred. 2018. “Gentrification is relentless, but not inevitable if locals are able to help shape development.” LSE USAPP US Politics and Policy. July 26 http://bit.ly/2mKA7Ga (accessed January 16, 2022).
12.
FernándezLilia. 2005. “From the Near West Side to 18th Street: Mexican Community Formation and Activism in Mid-Twentieth Century Chicago.” Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society98 (3): 162–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40193976.
13.
FernándezLilia. 2012. Brown in the Windy City. Mexicans and Puerto Ricans in Postwar Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
FulliloveMindy Thompson. 2004. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
15.
GarcíaIvis. 2018. “Symbolism, Collective Identity, and Community Development.” Societies8 (3): 1–13. doi:10.3390/soc8030081.
16.
García FloresAlisha. 2008. “Paseo Boricua: the Cultural and Entertainment District, a History of Community Advocacy and Partnership, a Need for Investment Without Displacement.” Report. Chicago: Division Street Business Development Association.
GilmoreRuth Wilson. 2002. “Fatal Couplings of Power and Difference: Notes on Racism and Geography.” Professional Geographer54 (1): 15–24. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00310.
19.
GlassRuth. 1964. “Introduction.” In London: Aspects of Change, edited by the Centre for Urban Studies, xiii–lii. London, UK: McGibben and Kee.
20.
GrammenosDennis. 2006. “Latino Chicago.” In Chicago’s Geographies: Metropolis for the 21st Century, edited by GreeneRichardBaumanMauriceGrammenosDennis, 205–16. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
Harris-LacewellMelissaAlbertsonBethanyAlthoffAmyCoxKristen. 2003. “Broken Glass: A Community Impact Study of the Chihuly Exhibit in Garfield Park, Chicago.” Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture, University of Chicago.
HarveyDavid. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
25.
HirshArnold. 1998. Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago 1940-1960. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HowellJuniaKorver-GlennElizabeth. 2020. “The Increasing Effect of Neighborhood Racial Composition on Housing Values, 1980-2015.” Social Problems68 (4): 1051–71. doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa033.
27.
HwangJackelynSampsonRobert J.. 2014. “Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods.” American Sociological Review79 (4): 726–51. doi:10.1177/0003122414535774.
28.
HyraDerek. 2008. The New Urban Renewal: The Economic Transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Institute of Housing Studies. 2014. Data Portal, DePaul University. https://www.housingstudies.org (accessed February 27th, 2021).
30.
JohnsonElmer W. 2001. Chicago Metropolis 2020: The Chicago Plan for the Twenty-First Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
KnoxPaul L.McCarthyLinda M.. 2013. Urbanization: An Introduction to Urban Geography. NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
LeesLoretta. 2000. “A Reappraisal of Gentrification: Towards a ‘Geography of Gentrification’.” Progress in Human Geography24 (3): 389–408. doi:10.1191/030913200701540483.
33.
LeesLorettaSlatterTomWylyElvin. 2010. The Gentrification Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
LevyDiane K.ComeyJenniferPadillaSandra. 2001. “In the Face of Gentrification: Case Studies of Local Efforts to Mitigate Displacement.” Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law16 (3): 238–315. doi:10.2307/25781105.
35.
MarcusePeter. 1997. “The Ghetto of Exclusion and the Fortified Enclave: New Patterns in the United States.” American Behavioral Scientist41 (3): 311–26. doi:10.1177/0002764297041003004.
MeleChristopher. 2013. “Neoliberalism, Race, and the Redefining of Urban Development.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37 (2): 598–617. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01144.x.
38.
MummJesse. 2014. “When the White People Come: Gentrification and Race in Puerto Rican Chicago.” Doctoral dissertation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
MummJesse. 2017. “The Racial Fix: White Currency in the Gentrification of Black and Latino Chicago.” Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology79: 102–17. doi:10.3167/fcl.2017.790109.
NydenPhilipEdlynnEmilyDavisJulie. 2006. “The Differential Impact of Gentrification on Communities in Chicago.” City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, Center for Urban Research and Learning, Loyola University.
43.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States. London: Routledge.
44.
PatilloMary. 2008. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
RamírezLeonard G. 2011. Chicanas of 18th Street: Narratives of a Movement from Latino Chicago. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
46.
Ramos-ZayasAna Yolanda. 2001. “‘All This Is Turning White Now’: Latino Constructions Of ‘White Culture’ and Whiteness in Chicago.” Centro Journal8 (2): 73–95. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=37711308006.
47.
RanneyDavid. 2003. Global Decisions, Local Collisions: Urban Life in the New World Order. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
48.
RobinsonCedric. 2000. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
RubenDavid-Hillel. 1994. “A Counterfactual Theory of Causal Explanation.” Noûs28 (4): 465–81. doi:10.2307/2215475.
51.
SelfRobert O. 2003. American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52.
SeligmanAmanda I. 2005. Block by Block: Neighborhoods and Public Policy on Chicago’s West Side. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
53.
SmithNeil. 1979. “Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital Not People.” Journal of the American Planning Association45 (4): 538–48. doi:10.1080/01944367908977002.
54.
SmithNeil. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and The Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.
55.
SquiresGregory D.BennettLarryMcCourtKathleenNydenPhilip. 1987. Chicago: Race, Class, and the Response to Urban Decline. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
56.
SternbergCarolinaAndersonMatthew. 2014. “Contestation and the Local Trajectories of Neoliberal Urban Governance in Chicago’s Bronzeville and Pilsen.” Urban Studies51 (15): 3198–214. doi:10.1177/0042098014532143.
57.
SugrueThomas J. 1996. The Origins of The Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58.
SuttonStacey. 2020. “Gentrification and the Increasing Significance of Racial Transition in New York City 1970–2010.” Urban Affairs Review56 (1): 65–95. doi:10.1177/1078087418771224.
University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). 2017. “The Latino Neighborhoods Report: Issues and Prospects for Chicago.” Institute for Research on Race and Public Policy and the Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago.
62.
WeberRachel. 2015. From Boom to Bubble: How Finance Built the New Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
WilliamsBrett. 1988. Upscaling Downtown: Stalled Gentrification in Washington, DC. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
64.
WilsonDavid. 2007. Cities and Race: America’s New Black Ghetto. New York: Routledge.
65.
WilsonDavid. 2018. Chicago’s Redevelopment Machine and Blues Clubs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
66.
WylyElvin K.HammelDaniel J.. 2000. “Capital’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Transformation of American Housing Policy.” Geografiska Annaler82 (4): 181–206. https://www.jstor.org/stable/491107.
67.
WylyElvin K.HammelDaniel J.. 2004. “Gentrification, Segregation and Discrimination in the American Urban System.” Environment and Planning A36 (7): 1215–41. doi:10.1068/a3610.
68.
ZukinSharon. 2010. Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places. New York: Oxford University Press.
