Many of the most tangible and immediate political conflicts in Americans’ lives occur at the local level. Yet, we lack large-scale evidence on how, why, and where conflict occurs in local governments. In this article, we present a new dataset of nearly 100,000 videos of school board meetings, and use them to create a new measure of local political conflict. We validate this new approach using sentiment analysis and structural topic modeling. We then document consistent results: conflict in school board meetings occurs at some point for most boards and has become more common since 2020, but the most intense conflicts are concentrated in a small number of districts; this conflict often centers cultural issues like racial diversity and gender identity. We then show that conflict, particularly cultural conflict, is most likely to occur in larger school districts in cities and suburbs and in places with more White students.
AbottCarolynMagazinnikAsya. 2020. “At-Large Elections and Minority Representation in Local Government.” American Journal of Political Science64 (3): 717–33.
2.
AlbertsonBethanyWhiteBenjamin T.. 2022. “Emotions in Politics: The Relevance of Groups.” In Handbook on Politics and Public Opinion, 283–97. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
AnziaSarah F.2011. “Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 412–27.
4.
AnziaSarah F.2019. “Looking for Influence in all the Wrong Places: How Studying Subnational Policy can Revive Research on Interest Groups.” The Journal of Politics81 (1): 343–51.
5.
BarariSoubhikSimkoTyler. 2023. “LocalView, a Database of Public Meetings for the Study of Local Politics and Policy-Making in the United States.” Scientific Data10 (1): 135.
6.
BarariSoubhikSimkoTyler. 2024. “The Promise of Text, Audio, and Video Data for the Study of US Local Politics and Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, pjae046. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjae046.
7.
BenjaminAndrea.2017a. “Coethnic Endorsements, Out-Group Candidate Preferences, and Perceptions in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review53 (4): 631–57.
8.
BenjaminAndrea.2017b. Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BenoitKennethWatanabeKoheiWangHaiyanNultyPaulObengAdamMüllerStefanMatsuoAkitaka. 2018. “quanteda: An R Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data.” Journal of Open Source Software3 (30): 774. https://quanteda.io
10.
BokhoveChristianDowneyChristopher. 2018. “Automated Generation of ‘Good Enough’ Transcripts as a First Step to Transcription of Audio-Recorded Data.” Methodological Innovations11 (2): 2059799118790743.
11.
BoussalisConstantineCoanTravis G.HolmanMirya R.MüllerStefan. 2021. “Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates.” American Political Science Review115 (4): 1242–57.
12.
BryanFrank M.2010. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How it Works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BullockCharles S.RodgersHarrell R.Jr. 1976. “Coercion to Compliance: Southern School Districts and School Desegregation Guidelines.” The Journal of Politics38 (4): 987–1011.
14.
BurnsPeter.2003. “Regime Theory, State Government, and a Takeover of Urban Education.” Journal of Urban Affairs25 (3): 285–303.
15.
BusbridgeRachelChouMark. 2022. “Culture Wars and City Politics, Revisited: Local Councils and the Australia Day Controversy.” Urban Affairs Review58 (1): 68–102.
16.
CastroAndrene J.Siegel-HawleyGenevieveBridgesKimberlyWilliamsShenita E.. 2022. “Narratives of Race in School Rezoning: How the Politics of Whiteness Shape Belonging, Leadership Decisions, and School Attendance Boundaries.” AERA Open8: 23328584221091274.
17.
CastroAndreneSiegel-HawleyGenevieveBridgesKimberlyWilliamsShenita E.. 2024. “Drawn into Policy: A Systematic Review of School Rezoning Rationales, Processes, and Outcomes.” Review of Educational Research94 (4): 539–83.
18.
ChatfieldSara.2025. The Politics of Bathroom Access and Exclusion in the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
ChouMarkBusbridgeRachel. 2020. Elements in Public and Nonprofit Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
20.
ChouMarkBusbridgeRachelRutledge-PriorSerrin. 2025. “From the Three Rs to the “Culture Wars”? How Australians Perceive Local Government Action on Climate Change, Indigenous Reconciliation, and LGBTQIA+Advocacy.” Urban Affairs Review61 (1): 260–81.
21.
ClotfelterCharles T.HemeltSteven W.LaddHelen F.TuraevaMavzuna R.. 2023. “School Segregation in the Era of Color-Blind Jurisprudence and School Choice.” Urban Affairs Review59 (2): 406–46.
22.
CollinsJonathan E.2018. “Urban Representation Through Deliberation: A Theory and Test of Deliberative Democracy at the Local Level.” Journal of Urban Affairs40 (7): 952–73.
23.
CollinsJonathan E.2021a. “Does the Meeting Style Matter? The Effects of Exposure to Participatory and Deliberative School Board Meetings.” American Political Science Review115 (3): 790–804.
24.
CollinsJonathan E.2021b. “Should School Boards be in Charge? The Effects of Exposure to Participatory and Deliberative School Board Meetings.” Peabody Journal of Education96 (3): 341–55.
25.
DahlRobertTufteEdward. 1973. Size and Democracy (The Politics of the Smaller European Democracies). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinLeeDiana Da InVelezYamil R.WarshawChristopher. 2023. “American Local Government Elections Database.” Scientific Data10 (1): 912.
27.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1124–38.
28.
DeckmanMelissa M.2004. School Board Battles: The Christian Right in Local Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
DeckmanMelissa.2007. “School Board Candidates and Gender: Ideology, Party, and Policy Concerns.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy28 (1): 87–117.
30.
DiemSarahFrankenbergEricaClearyColleen. 2015. “Factors That Influence School Board Policy Making: The Political Context of Student Diversity in Urban-Suburban Districts.” Educational Administration Quarterly51 (5): 712–52.
31.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid M.PalmerMaxwell. 2019. Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America’s Housing Crisis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavidPuigLuisa GodinezPalmerMaxwell. 2023. “Still Muted: The Limited Participatory Democracy of Zoom Public Meetings.” Urban Affairs Review59 (4): 1279–91.
33.
EinsteinKatherine LevinePalmerMaxwellGlickDavid M.. 2019. “Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes.” Perspectives on Politics17 (1): 28–46.
34.
EllisRichard J.2005. To the Flag: The Unlikely History of the Pledge of Allegiance. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
35.
ElwoodKarina.2023. “Some Fairfax School Board Members Sworn in on Banned Books.” Washington Post.
36.
FarrisEmily M.MohamedHeather Silber. 2022. “Race and the Rush to Reopen Schools During COVID-19.” Journal of Public Management & Social Policy29 (1): 7.
37.
FordMichael R.IhrkeDouglas M.. 2017. “Board Conflict and Public Performance on Urban and non-Urban Boards: Evidence from a National Sample of School Board Members.” Journal of Urban Affairs39 (1): 108–21.
38.
FordMichaelIhrkeDouglas. 2020. “Uncontested: Electoral Competition in American School Board Elections.” Journal of Educational Administration58 (6): 661–75.
39.
FrancisMegan MingWright-RigueurLeah. 2021. “Black Lives Matter in Historical Perspective.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science17 (1): 441–58.
40.
GilardiFabrizioShipanCharles R.WuestBruno. 2021. “Policy Diffusion: The Issuedefinition Stage.” American Journal of Political Science65 (1): 21–35.
41.
HajnalZoltanTrounstineJessica. 2014. “What Underlies Urban Politics? Race, Class, Ideology, Partisanship, and the Urban Vote.” Urban Affairs Review50 (1): 63–99.
42.
HamelBrian T.2025. “Inequality in the Classroom: Electoral Incentives and the Distribution of Local Education Spending.” Journal of Politics87 (2): 527–543.
43.
HartneyMichael T.FingerLeslie K.. 2022. “Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19.” Perspectives on Politics20 (2): 457–73.
44.
HoangBai Linh. 2021. “Racial Disparities in Public Meeting Participation? Examining Past Evidence and Nationally Representative Data.” Urban Affairs Review57 (1): 189–213.
45.
HoangBai LinhBenjaminAndrea. 2024. ““Defund” or “Refund” the Police?: City Council Responsiveness to the Black Lives Matter Protests.” Urban Affairs Review60 (1): 387–419.
46.
HolmanMirya R.2014. Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
47.
HolmanMirya R.2016. “Gender, Political Rhetoric, and Moral Metaphors in State of the City Addresses.” Urban Affairs Review52 (4): 501–30.
48.
HolmanMiryaSimkoTyler. 2025. “Tabling Debate: How Local Officials Use Agenda Control to Stifle Conflict.” Working paper.
49.
HopkinsDaniel J.2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Johnson-LairdPhilip NicholasOatleyKeith. 1989. “The Language of Emotions: An Analysis of a Semantic Field.” Cognition and Emotion3 (2): 81–123.
51.
KaspersonRoger E.1986. “Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis6 (3): 275–81.
52.
KitchensKarin E.2021. “Exit or Invest: Segregation Increases Investment in Public Schools.” The Journal of Politics83 (1): 71–86.
53.
KitchensKarinGoldbergMegan. 2024. “Partisanship and Professionalization: School Board Decision-Making in the Midst of a Pandemic.” Urban Affairs Review, 10780874241227792.
54.
KitchensKarinHarrisSabrinaMillerKathryn. 2024. “What Matters in School Reopening Plans: An Analysis of the Impact of School Board Demographics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities12 (1): 186–216.
55.
KotoFajriAdrianiMirna. 2015. “A Comparative Study on Twitter Sentiment Analysis: Which Features are Good?.” In 20th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Springer, 453–7.
56.
KreitzerRebecca J.KaneKellen A.MooneyChristopher Z.. 2019. “The Evolution of Morality Policy Debate: Moralization and Demoralization.” The Forum17 (1): 3–24. Publisher: De Gruyter.
57.
LayJ. CelesteBaumanAnna. 2019. “Private Governance of Public Schools: Representation, Priorities, and Compliance in New Orleans Charter School Boards.” Urban Affairs Review55 (4): 1006–34.
58.
LiaoHankMcDermottErikSeniorAndrew. 2013. “Large Scale Deep Neural Network Acoustic Modeling with Semi-Supervised Training Data for YouTube Video Transcription.” In 2013 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. IEEE, 368–73.
59.
MacDonaldBradley A.2022. “What’s in a Name?: The Constitutionality of Using Personal Pronouns in Public Schools.” UIC L. Rev56: 477.
60.
MansbridgeJane J.1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61.
McComasKatherine A.2001. “Theory and Practice of Public Meetings.” Communication Theory11 (1): 36–55.
62.
McGirrLisa.2015. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right: The Origins of the New American Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
McRaeElizabeth Gillespie. 2018. Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
MichenerJamila.2020. “Power from the Margins: Grassroots Mobilization and Urban Expansions of Civil Legal Rights.” Urban Affairs Review56 (5): 1390–422.
65.
MorelDomingo.2018. Takeover: Race, Education, and American Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66.
MullerStefanProkschSven-Oliver. 2024. “Nostalgia in European Party Politics: A Text Based Measurement Approach.” British Journal of Political Science54 (3): 993–1005.
67.
NelsenMatthew D.2023. The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
NielsenFinn ˚Arup. 2011. “A new ANEW: Evaluation of a Word List for Sentiment Analysis in Microblogs.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1103.2903.
69.
NuamahSally A.2022. Closed for Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
70.
NuamahSally A.OgorzalekThomas. 2021. “Close to Home: Place-Based Mobilization in Racialized Contexts.” American Political Science Review115 (3): 757–74.
71.
PangBoLeeLillian. 2008. “Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis.” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval2 (1–2): 1–135.
72.
ParcelToby L.TaylorAndrew J.. 2015. The End of Consensus: Diversity, Neighborhoods, and the Politics of Public School Assignments. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press Books.
73.
PenningtonJeffreySocherRichardManningChristopher D.. 2014. “GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation.” In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1532–43.
74.
PhoenixDavin L.2019. The Anger Gap: How Race Shapes Emotion in Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
PiersonPaul.2000. “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes.” Studies in American Political Development14 (1): 72–92.
76.
PollockMicaRogersJohnKwakoAlexanderMatschinerAndrewKendallReedBingenerCicelyReeceErikaKennedyBenjaminHowardJaleel. 2022. “The Conflict Campaign: Exploring Local Experiences of the Campaign to Ban “Critical Race Theory” in Public K–12 Education in the US, 2020–2021.” UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access.
77.
PostAlison E.KuipersNicholas. 2023. “City Size and Public Service Access: Evidence from Brazil and Indonesia.” Perspectives on Politics21 (3): 811–30.
78.
ProkschSven-OliverLoweWillWackerleJensSorokaStuart. 2019. “Multilingual Sentiment Analysis: A new Approach to Measuring Conflict in Legislative Speeches.” Legislative Studies Quarterly44 (1): 97–131.
79.
RamakrishnanS. KarthickViramontesCelia. 2010. “Civic Spaces: Mexican Hometown Associations and Immigrant Participation.” Journal of Social Issues66 (1): 155–73.
80.
ReckhowSarahHenigJeffrey R.JacobsenRebeccaLittJamie Alter. 2017. ““Outsiders with Deep Pockets”: The Nationalization of Local School Board Elections.” Urban Affairs Review53 (5): 783–811.
81.
RobertsMargaret E.StewartBrandon M.TingleyDustinLucasChristopherLederLuisJetsonGadarianShana KushnerAlbertsonBethanyRandDavid G.. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 1064–82.
82.
RodriguezPedro L.SpirlingArthur. 2022. “Word Embeddings: What Works, What Doesn’t, and how to Tell the Difference for Applied Research.” The Journal of Politics84 (1): 101–15.
83.
RughJacob S.TrounstineJessica. 2011. “The Provision of Local Public Goods in Diverse Communities: Analyzing Municipal Bond Elections.” The Journal of Politics73 (4): 1038–50.
84.
SahnAlexander.2024. “Public Comment and Public Policy.” American Journal of Political Science69 (2): 685–700.
85.
SchattschneiderElmer Eric.1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
86.
ScottJamil S.MichelsonMelissa R.DeMoraStephanie L.. 2022. “Getting out the Black Vote in Washington DC: A Field Experiment.” In The 2020 US Presidential Election, 39–51. New York, NY: Routledge.
87.
ShahParu.2019. “Racial Change, Racial Threat, and Minority Representation in Cities.” Urban Affairs Review55 (4): 979–1005.
88.
ShahParuWeinschenkAaronYianniasZach. 2024. “Schoolhouse Rocked: Pandemic Politics and the Nationalization of School Board Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly24 (2): 207–17.
89.
SharpElaine B.1996. “Culture Wars and City Politics: Local Government’s Role in Social Conflict.” Urban Affairs Review31 (6): 738–58.
90.
SharpElaine B.2007. “Revitalizing Urban Research: Can Cultural Explanation Bring Us Back from the Periphery?” Urban Affairs Review43 (1): 55–75.
91.
Siegel-HawleyGenevieveBridgesKimberlyShieldsThomas J.. 2017. “Solidifying Segregation or Promoting Diversity? School Closure and Rezoning in an Urban District.” Educational Administration Quarterly53 (1): 107–41.
92.
SimkoTyler.2024. “School Desegregation by Redrawing District Boundaries.” Scientific Reports14 (1): 22097.
93.
SimkoTylerSiegel-HawleyGenevieve. 2025. “Policy Trenches: American Federalism and the Politics of Cross-Sectoral Action on Housing and Education Inequality.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Forthcoming.
94.
StapletonCarey E.DawkinsRyan. 2022. “Catching my Anger: How Political Elites Create Angrier Citizens.” Political Research Quarterly75 (3): 754–65.
95.
SumnerJane LawrenceFarrisEmily M.HolmanMirya R.. 2020. “Crowdsourcing Reliable Local Data.” Political Analysis28 (2): 244–62.
96.
TepperSteven J.2004. “Setting Agendas and Designing Alternatives: Policymaking and the Strategic Role of Meetings.” Review of Policy Research21 (4): 523–42.
97.
TracyKarenDurfyMargaret. 2007. “Speaking out in Public: Citizen Participation in Contentious School Board Meetings.” Discourse & Communication1 (2): 223–49.
98.
TrexlerAndrewMullinMegan. 2024. “Local News Reporting and Mass Attitudes on Infrastructure Investment.” Political Behavior46 (4): 2657–2675.
99.
TrounstineJessica.2009. “All Politics is Local: The Reemergence of the Study of City Politics.” Perspectives on Politics7 (3): 611–8.
100.
TrounstineJessica.2016. “Segregation and Inequality in Public Goods.” American Journal of Political Science60 (3): 709–25.
101.
TrounstineJessica.2018. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
102.
TrounstineJessica.2023. “You Won’t be My Neighbor: Opposition to High Density Development.” Urban Affairs Review59 (1): 294–308.
103.
VannoniMatiaAshElliottMorelliMassimo. 2021. “Measuring Discretion and Delegation in Legislative Texts: Methods and Application to US States.” Political Analysis29 (1): 43–57.
104.
WilliamsonRyan D.SievertJoel. 2024. “Who Gets Blamed When Congress and the President Collide?” Congress & the Presidency51 (1): 81–102.
105.
ZimmermanJonathan.2021. “Why the Culture Wars in Schools are Worse than Ever Before.” POLITICO September.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
