Many U.S. elections provide voters with precious little information about candidates on the ballot. In local contests, party labels are often absent. In primary elections, party labels are not useful. Indeed, much of the time, voters have only the name of the candidate to go by. In these contexts, how do voters make decisions? Using several experiments, we find that voters use candidates’ race, ethnicity, and gender as cues for whom to support—penalizing candidates of color and benefiting women. But we also demonstrate that providing even a small amount of information to voters—such as candidate occupation—virtually erases the effects of candidate demographics on voter behavior, even among voters with high levels of racial and gender prejudice.
AnsolabehereStephenStewartCharles. 2005. “Residual Votes Attributable to Technology.” The Journal of Politics67 (2): 365–89.
2.
AnziaSarahBerryChristopher. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 478–93.
3.
BanajiMahzarin R.GreenwaldAnthony G.2013. Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. New York: Random House Publishing Group.
4.
BauerNichole. 2015. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates.” Political Psychology36 (6): 691–708.
5.
BenjaminAndrea. 2016. “Coethnic Endorsements, Out-Group Candidate Preferences, and Perceptions in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review53 (4): 631–57.
6.
BerinskyAdamHuberGregoryLenzGabriel. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis20 (3): 351–68.
7.
BoboLawrenceCharlesCamilleKrysanMariaSimmonsAlicia. 2012. “The Real Record on Racial Attitudes.” In Social Trends in American Life: Findings from the General Social Survey Since 1972, edited by MarsdenPeter, 33-83. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
8.
BolesJanet. 2001. “Local Elected Women and Policymaking: Movement Delegates or Feminist Trustees.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, edited by CarrollSusan J., 68–87. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
9.
BradyHenrySnidermanPaul. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review79 (4): 1061–78.
BurrellBarbara. 2014. Gender in Campaigns for the US House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
12.
ButlerDanielHomolaJonathan. 2017. “An Empirical Justification for the Use of Racially Distinctive Names to Signal Race in Experiments.” Political Analysis25 (1): 122-130.
13.
CitrinJackGreenDonald PhilipSearsDavid O.1990. “White Reactions to Black Candidates: When Does Race Matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly54 (1): 74–96.
14.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyGadarianShana KushnerTrounstineJessica. 2015. “Electoral Institutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women’s Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (2): 318–34.
15.
DevinePatriciaMonteithMargo. 1993. “The Role of Discrepancy-Associated Affect in Prejudice Reduction.” In Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception, edited by MackieDianeHamiltonDavid, 317–44. San Diego: Academic Press.
16.
DolanKathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
17.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
18.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review109 (3): 573–98.
19.
FiskeSusan T.1998. “Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination.” In The handbook of Social Psychology, edited by GilbertDaniel T.FiskeSusan, 357–411. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
20.
FiskeSusan T.TaylorShelley E.2013. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21.
FultonSarah. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels the Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 303–14.
22.
FultonSarahMaestasCherieMaiselL. SandyStoneWalter. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly59 (2): 235–48.
23.
GrantDarren. 2017. “The Ballot Order Effect Is Huge: Evidence from Texas.” Public Choice172 (3–4): 421–42.
24.
GreenDonald P.KrasnobJonathan S.CoppockaAlexanderFarrercBenjamin D.LenoirdBrandonZinghereJoshua N.2016. “The Effects of Lawn Signs on Vote Outcomes: Results from Four Randomized Field Experiments.” Electoral Studies41:143–50.
25.
GreenPaul E.KriegerAbba M.WindYoram. 2001. “Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects.” Interfaces31 (3): S56–73.
26.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDanielYamamotoTeppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multi-dimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22:1–30.
27.
HayesDannyLawlessJennifer. 2015. “As Local News Goes, so Goes Citizen Engagement: Media, Knowledge, and Participation in US House Elections.” The Journal of Politics77 (2): 447–62.
28.
HortonJohnRandDavidZeckhauserRichard. 2011. “The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market.” Experimental Economics14 (3): 399–425.
29.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanley. 2009. “On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice.” Annual Review of Political Science12:423–47.
30.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–47.
31.
HuffConnorTingleyDustin. 2015. “‘Who Are These People?’ Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics2 (3): 1-12.
32.
HutchingsVincent L.ValentinoNicholas A.2004. “The Centrality of Race in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science7:383–408.
33.
JacobsmeierMatthew L.2014. “Racial Stereotypes and Perceptions of Representatives’ Ideologies in U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly39 (2): 261–91.
34.
JonesPhilip Edward. 2014. “Revisiting Stereotypes of Non-White Politicians’ Ideological and Partisan Orientations.” American Politics Research42 (2): 283–310.
35.
KaoGrace. 1995. “Asian Americans as Model Minorities? A Look at Their Academic Performance.” American Journal of Education103 (2): 121–59.
36.
KarnigAlbertWelchSusan. 1980. Black Representation and Urban Policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
37.
KeyV. O.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press.
38.
KimClaire Jean. 1999. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics & Society27 (1): 105–38.
39.
KimballDavid C.KropfMartha. 2008. “Voting Technology, Ballot Measures, and Residual Votes.” American Politics Research36 (4): 479–509.
40.
KinderDonald R.KamCindy D.2009. Us against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
41.
KinderDonald R.SandersLynn. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
42.
KirklandPatricia A.CoppockAlexander. 2017. “Candidate Choice Without Party Labels.” Political Behavior40:571–91.
43.
KnowlesEric D.LoweryBrian S.SchaumbergRebecca L.2010. “Racial Prejudice Predicts Opposition to Obama and His Health Care Reform Plan.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46 (2): 420–23.
44.
KochJeffrey W.2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” The Journal of Politics62 (2): 414–29.
45.
LauRichard R.RedlawskDavid P.1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review91 (3): 585–98.
46.
LawlessJennifer. 2011. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
47.
LupiaArthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review88 (1): 63–76.
48.
MaldonadoMarta Maria. 2006. “Racial Triangulation of Latino/a Workers by Agricultural Employers.” Human Organization65 (4): 353–61.
49.
MarschallMelissaShahParu R.2007. “The Attitudinal Effects of Minority Incorporation: Examining the Racial Dimensions of Trust in Urban America.” Urban Affairs Review42 (5): 629–58.
50.
McCabeAmy E.BrannonLaura A.2004. “An Examination of Racial Subtypes Versus Subgroups.” Current Research in Social Psychology9 (8): 109–23.
51.
McConnaughyCorrineWhiteIsmailLealDavidCasellasJason. 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting Among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1199–1211.
52.
McDermottMonika L.1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
53.
McDermottMonika L.2005. “Candidate Occupations and Voter Information Shortcuts.” The Journal of Politics67 (1): 201–19.
54.
McThomasMaryTeslerMichael. 2016. “The Growing Influence of Gender Attitudes on Public Support for Hillary Clinton, 2008–2012.” Politics & Gender12 (1): 28–49.
55.
MoCecilia Hyunjung. 2015. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior37 (2): 357–95.
56.
MullinixKevin J.LeeperThomas J.DruckmanJames N.FreeseJeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–38.
57.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.CallenZachary. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
58.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2016. Political Campaigns: Concepts, Context, and Consequences. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Accessed February 5, 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=TrUMkAEACAAJ.
59.
PistonSpencer. 2010. “How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election.” Political Behavior32 (4): 431–51.
60.
PopkinSamuel L.1995. “Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter.” In Information, Participation and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective, edited by GrofmanBernie, 17–35. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
61.
PriorMarkus. 2007. Post-broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
62.
ProvinsTessa. 2018. “Information, Economy, and Gender: Leveraging US State Legislatures for Comparative Analysis of Legislative Institutions.” PhD diss., University of California, Merced.
63.
SchaffnerBrian F.StrebMatthewWrightGerald. 2001. “Tearns Without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly54 (1): 7–30.
64.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2011. “An Exploration of the Content of Stereotypes of Black Politicians.” Political Psychology32 (2): 205–33.
65.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology35 (2): 245–66.
66.
SchumakerPaulBurnsNancy. 1988. “Gender Cleavages and the Resolution of Local Policy Issues.” American Journal of Political Science32 (4): 1070–95.
67.
SenMaya. 2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 374–93.
68.
ShakerLee. 2014. “Dead Newspapers and Citizens’ Civic Engagement.” Political Communication31 (1): 131–48.
69.
SharrowElizabeth A.StrolovitchDara Z.HeaneyMichael T.MasketSeth E.MillerJoanne M.2016. “Gender Attitudes, Gendered Partisanship: Feminism and Support for Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton among Party Activists.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy37 (4): 394–416.
70.
SidesJohnTeslerMichaelVavreckLynn. 2017. “How Trump Lost and Won.” Journal of Democracy28 (2): 34–44.
71.
SimasElizabeth N.BumgardnerMarcia. 2017. “Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the ‘War on Women.’” Politics & Gender13:359–78.
StoutChristopher T.LeDanvy. 2017. “Traiting Places: Race and the Evaluation of Black and White Presidential Candidates.” Presidential Studies Quarterly47 (2): 311–35.
75.
SwimJanet K.AikinKathryn J.HallWayne S.HunterBarbara A.1995. “Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68 (2): 199–214.
76.
TateKatherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
77.
TerkildsenNayda. 1993. “When White Voters Evaluate Black Candidates: The Processing Implications of Candidate Skin Color, Prejudice, and Self-monitoring.” American Journal of Political Science37 (4): 1032–53.
78.
TeslerMichael. 2016. Post-racial or Most-Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
79.
TeslerMichaelSearsDavid O.2010. Obama’s Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-racial America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
80.
ThomsenDanielle M.2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly40 (2): 295–323.
81.
TodorovAlexanderMandisodzaAnesu N.GorenAmirHallCrystal C.2005. “Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes.” Science308 (5728): 1623–26.
82.
VisalvanichNeil. 2017. “When Does Race Matter? Exploring White Responses to Minority Congressional Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities5:618–41.
83.
WolfingerRaymond E.HightonBenjaminMullinMegan. 2005. “How Postregistration Laws Affect the Turnout of Citizens Registered to Vote.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly5 (1): 1–23.
84.
XuJunLeeJennifer C.2013. “The Marginalized ‘Model’ Minority: An Empirical Examination of the Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Social Forces91 (4): 1363–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
