Abstract
This commentary reflects on the broader significance of Austin's experience with Project Connect, as discussed in Karner and Shuster's article. It suggests that, absent major shifts in the structure of the American political economy and the character of local political institutions, the struggle for transportation justice will remain challenging. Yet the Austin case makes it clear that not all is lost. The prevalence of ballot initiatives means that local pro-transit coalitions must develop broadly appealing proposals. By building their organizational capacity and taking advantage of strategic opportunities to position themselves as valuable coalition partners, transit justice activists can from time to time achieve the influence needed to score significant victories, even in the face of long odds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
