With the onset of the Great Recession, it looked for a moment that neoliberalism had become vulnerable to challenges from the urban level. Yet, it appears that the neoliberal ideas, institutions, and policy frameworks continue to dominate urban governance. As such, there remains a need to develop interpretive frames through which to examine the construction and reproduction of urban neoliberalism. This article seeks to provide a historically grounded account of urban neoliberalization, which pays specific attention to how neoliberalism has been constructed ideologically, politically, and institutionally. Through a comparison of cases in the United Kingdom and the United States, I suggest that the respective alignment of ideas, institutions, and interests accounts for “the pace, extent, and character” of urban neoliberalization. I argue that the variation in the manner of urban neoliberalization may be captured through two key mechanisms: neoliberalism by design and neoliberalism by default.
AdamsCarolyn Teich. 2003. “The Meds and Eds in Urban Economic Development.”Journal of Urban Affairs25 (5): 571–88.
2.
AdamsCarolyn TeichBartletDavidEleshDavidGoldsteinIra. 2008. Restructuring the Philadelphia Region: Metropolitan Divisions and Inequality. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
3.
AdamsCarolyn TeichBartletDavidEleshDavidGoldsteinIraKleniewskiNancyYancyWilliam. 1991. Philadelphia: Neighborhoods, Division, and Conflict in a Postindustrial City. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
4.
AtkinsonRob. 1994. Urban Policy in Britain: The City, the State and the Market. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
5.
BarnesJohnColenuttBobMalonePatrick. 1996. “London: Docklands and the State.” In City, Capital, and Water, edited by MalonePatrick, 15–36. London: Routledge.
6.
BarskyNeil. 1992. “Bootstrapping Mayor Raises Hope of Revival in, Yes, Philadelphia.”Wall Street Journal, February22: 1.
7.
BaumanJohn F.1992. “W. Wilson Goode: The Black Mayor as Urban Entrepreneur.”The Journal of Negro History77 (3): 141–58.
BrownillSue. 1993. Developing London’s Docklands: Another Great Planning Disaster?London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
15.
CaraleyDemetrios. 1992. “Washington Abandons the Cities.”Political Science Quarterly107 (1): 1–30.
16.
ClavelPierre. 2010. Activists in City Hall: The Progressive Response to the Reagan Era in Boston and Chicago. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
17.
CountrymanMatthew J.2006a. “From Protest to Politics.”Journal of Urban History32 (6): 813–61.
18.
DeLeonRichard Edward. 1992. Left Coast City: Progressive Politics in San Francisco, 1975–1991. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
19.
DilworthRichardson, ed. 2009. The City in American Political Development. New York: Routledge.
20.
ElkinStephen L.1987. City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
21.
FainsteinSusan S.2001. The City Builders: Property Development in New York and London, 1980–2000. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
22.
FosterJanet. 1999. Docklands: Cultures in Conflict, Worlds in Collision. London: Univ. College London Press.
23.
GambleAndrew. 1988. “Privatization, Thatcherism, and the British State.”Journal of Law and Society16 (1): 1–20.
24.
GoodeWilson. 1992. In Goode Faith: Philadelphia’s first black mayor tells his story. Valley Forge, PA: Judson Press.
25.
GottschalkMarie. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
26.
GurrTed RobertKingDesmond S.1987. The State and the City. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
27.
HaasNancy. 1993. “Philadelphia Freedom: How Privatization Has Worked Wonders in the City of Brotherly Love and Beyond.”Financial World, August3: 37–38.
28.
HackerJacobPiersonPaul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29.
HackworthJason R.2007. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
30.
HarveyDavid. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.”Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography71 (1): 3–17.
31.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
32.
HarveyDavid. 2010. The Enigma of Capital: And the Crises of Capitalism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
33.
HarveyDavid. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.
34.
HayColin. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by BélandDanielCoxRobert Henry, 65–82. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
35.
HayekFriedrich A.1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
36.
HeseltineMichael. 2000. Life in the Jungle: My Autobiography. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
House of Lords. 1981. Report of House of Lords Select Committee on the London Docklands Development Corporation (Area and Constitution) Order. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
39.
HoweGeoffrey. 1988a. Enterprise Zones and the Enterprise Culture. London: Bow Publications.
40.
HoweGeoffrey. 1988b. “Liberating Free Enterprise: A New Experiment, Speech to the Bow Group, London, June 26, 1978.” In Enterprise Zones and the Enterprise Culture, edited by HoweGeoffrey, 7–12. London: Bow Publications.
41.
ImbroscioDavid L.2010. Urban America Reconsidered: Alternatives for Governance and Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
42.
InmanRobert P.1995. “How to Have a Fiscal Crisis: Lessons from Philadelphia.”The American Economic Review85 (2): 378–83.
43.
JenkinsCarol.2001. “The Miracle or Mirage of Local Governance? Mayor Rendell and the Philadelphia Fiscal Crisis.” PhD dissertation, Temple Univ., Philadelphia.
44.
JonesDaniel Stedman. 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
45.
JonesMartinWardKevin. 2002“Excavating the Logic of British Urban Policy: Neoliberalism as the ‘Crisis of Crisis Management.’” In Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, edited by BrennerNeilTheodoreNikolas, 126–47. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
KatzMichael B.2001. The Price of Citizenship: Redefining America’s Welfare State. New York: Henry Holt.
48.
KeiserRichard A.1997a. “After the First Black Mayor: Fault Lines in Philadelphia’s Biracial Coalition.” In Racial Politics in American Cities, edited by BrowningRufus P.MarshallDale RogersTabbDavid H., 2nd ed., 65–93. New York: Longman.
49.
KeiserRichard A.1997b. Subordination or Empowerment? African-American Leadership and the Struggle for Urban Political Power. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
50.
LiebermanRobert C.2011. “Ideas and Institutions in Race Politics.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by BélandDanielCoxRobert Henry, 209–27. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
51.
LoganJohn R.MolotchHarvey Luskin. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
52.
McGovernStephen J.1997. “Mayoral Leadership and Economic Development Policy: The Case of Ed Rendell’s Philadelphia.”Policy & Politics25 (2): 153–72.
53.
McKeeGuian A.2008. The Problem of Jobs: Liberalism, Race, and Deindustrialization in Philadelphia. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
54.
MossbergerKaren. 2000. The Politics of Ideas and the Spread of Enterprise Zones. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
55.
OrrenKarenSkowronekStephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
56.
PeckJamie. 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
PeckJamieTheodoreNikBrennerNeil. 2013. “Neoliberal Urbanism Redux?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37 (3): 1091–99.
59.
PeckJamieTickellAdam. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” In Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, edited by BrennerNeilTheodoreNikolas, 33–57. Malden: Blackwell.
60.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
61.
PiersonPaul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
62.
PiersonPaulSkocpolTheda. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by KatznelsonIraMilnerHelen, 639–721. New York: W.W. Norton.
63.
PrasadMonica. 2006. The Politics of Free Markets: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
64.
PrzeworskiAdamTeuneHenry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
RastJoel. 2012. “Why History (Still) Matters: Time and Temporality in Urban Political Analysis.”Urban Affairs Review48 (1): 3–36.
67.
RastJoel. 2015. “Urban Regime Theory and the Problem of Change.”Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 138–49.
68.
ReedAdolphJr.1999. Stirrings in the Jug: Black Politics in the Post-Segregation Era. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
69.
SelfRobert O.2003. American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland. Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, N.J: Princeton Univ. Press.
70.
SidneyMara. 2010. “Critical Perspectives on the City: Constructivist, Interpretive Analysis of Urban Politics.” In Critical Urban Studies: New Directions, edited by ImbroscioDavid L.DaviesJonathan S., 23–39. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.
71.
SiegelFredHymowitzKay S.1999. “Why Did Ed Rendell Fizzle Out?”City Journal Autumn2 (4): 14–27.
72.
SimonRoger D.AlnuttBrian. 2007. “Philadelphia, 1982–2007: Toward the Postindustrial City.”The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography131 (4): 395–444.
73.
SitesWilliam. 2003. Remaking New York: Primitive Globalization and the Politics of Urban Community. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
74.
SmithRogers M.2006. “Which Comes First, the Ideas or the Institutions?” In Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, edited by ShapiroIanSkowronekStephenGalvinDaniel, 91–113. New York: New York Univ. Press.
75.
SmithRogers M.2014. “Ideas and the Spiral of Politics: The Place of American Political Thought in American Political Development.”American Political Thought3 (1): 126–36.
76.
SmithStephen Samuel. 2004. Boom for Whom? Education, Desegregation, and Development in Charlotte. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
77.
StoneClarence N.1980. “Systemic Power in Community Decision Making: A Restatement of Stratification Theory.”The American Political Science Review74 (4): 978–90.
78.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
79.
StoneClarence N.2015. “Reflections on Regime Politics: From Governing Coalition to Urban Political Order.”Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 101–37.
80.
StoneClarence N.WhelanRobert. 2011. “When the Twain Meet: Urban Politics and APD.”Clio: Newsletter of Politics and History22 (2): 3.
81.
SugrueThomas J.2005. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
82.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. “Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000, Philadelphia City, Pennsylvania.”U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
83.
WarnerSam BassJr.1968. The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of Its Growth. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
84.
WeaverTimothy P. R.2016. Blazing the Neoliberal Trail: Urban Political Development in the United States and the United Kingdom. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
85.
WeirMargaret. 1989. “Ideas and Politics: The Acceptance of Keynesianism in Britain and the United States.” In The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations, edited by HallPeter A., 53–86. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
86.
WolfingerJames. 2007. Philadelphia Divided: Race & Politics in the City of Brotherly Love. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
87.
WolmanHarold. 1992. Urban Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
88.
WoodAnthony R.1992. “Enterprise Zones Are Promoted Congress Gets a Rendell Plea.”The Philadelphia Inquirer, April25, C10.
