This article examines the relationship between the political fragmentation of cities in metropolitan regions, the distribution of social vulnerability, and the city-level economic and social sustainability strategies they adopt. Strategies emerge from prevailing community norms, and polycentric governance arrangements can support conditions in which both economic and social sustainability strategies emerge as compliments, contrary to the concern that fragmentation spurs zero-sum competition. Combining surveys of U.S. cities with social vulnerability data and text analysis of planning documents, we find that greater fragmentation has a negative impact on the sustainable development strategies cities adopt. However, growth and sustainable development strategies tend to develop alongside social sustainability efforts to address human needs. We conclude that development strategies emerge in polycentric systems in relation to the degree of fragmentation which exists, and that subsequent work should continue to focus on identifying these entropic thresholds in order to effectively address lingering inequities.
AligicaPaul DragosBoettkePeter J.. 2009. Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School. London, UK: Routledge.
3.
AligicaPaul D.TarkoVlad. 2012. “Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and Beyond.” Governance25 (2): 237–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01550.x.
4.
AligicaPaul DragosTarkoVlad. 2013. “Co-Production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited.” The American Political Science Review107 (4): 726–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000427
5.
AnastasopoulosL. J.MoldogazievT. T.ScottT.. 2020. “Organizational Context and Budget Orientations: A Computational Text Analysis.” International Public Management Journal23 (2): 292–313.
6.
AnderssonKrister P.OstromElinor. 2008. “Analyzing Decentralized Resource Regimes from a Polycentric Perspective.” Policy Sciences41 (1): 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6.
7.
AndrewsRhysBeynonMalcolm J.McDermottAoife M.. 2016. “Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory26 (2): 239–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv005.
8.
AndrewsRhysBoyneGeorge A.. 2010. “Capacity, Leadership, and Organizational Performance: Testing the Black Box Model of Public Management.” Public Administration Review70 (3): 443–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x.
9.
BerryChristopher R.2009. Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Governments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BlessettBrandiFudgeMarcGaynorTia. 2017. Moving from Theory to Practice: An Evaluative Assessment of Social Equity Approaches.Washington, DC: Center for Accountability and Performance.
11.
BrinkleyC.StahmerC.. 2021. “What is in a Plan? Using Natural Language Processing to Read 461 California City General Plans.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X21995890.
12.
BrysonJohn M.2016. “Strategic Planning and the Strategy Change Cycle.” The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, 240–73.
13.
CampbellScott D.2016. “The Planner’s Triangle Revisited: Sustainability and the Evolution of a Planning Ideal That Can't Stand Still.” Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association82 (4): 388–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080.
14.
CarlisleKeithGrubyRebecca L.. 2019. “Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons.” Policy Studies Journal47 (4): 927–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212.
15.
CarterDavid P.DeslatteAaronScottTyler A.. 2019. “The Formation and Administration of Multipurpose Development Districts: Private Interests Through Public Institutions.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance2 (1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy009.
16.
DeMarsChristine.2010. Item Response Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
DeslatteAaron.2020a. “Revisiting Bureaucratic Entrepreneurialism in the Age of Urban Austerity: Framing Issues, Taking Risks, and Building Collaborative Capacity.” Urban Studies and Entrepreneurship, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-15164-5_8.
18.
DeslatteAaron.2020b. “Managerial Friction and Land-Use Policy Punctuations in the Fragmented Metropolis.” Policy Studies Journal.
19.
DeslatteAaron.2022. “Organizing and Institutionalizing Local Sustainability: A Design Approach.” Elements in Public and Nonprofit Administration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105804.
20.
DeslatteAaronFeiockRichard C.WasselKathryn. 2017. “Urban Pressures and Innovations: Sustainability Commitment in the Face of Fragmentation and Inequality.” The Review of Policy Research34 (5): 700–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12242.
21.
DeslatteAaronKimSerenaHawkinsChristopher V.StokanEric. 2022. “Keeping Policy Commitments: An Organizational Capability Approach to Local Green Housing Equity.” The Review of Policy ResearchAugust, https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12499.
22.
DeslatteAaronSicilianoMichael D.KrauseRachel M.. 2023. “Local Government Managers Are on the Frontlines of Climate Change: Are They Ready?” Public Administration Review83 (6): 1506–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13726.
23.
DeslatteAaronStokanEric. 2019. “Hierarchies of Need in Sustainable Development: A Resource Dependence Approach for Local Governance.” Urban Affairs Review55 (4): 1125–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417737181.
24.
DeslatteAaronStokanEric. 2020. “Sustainability Synergies or Silos? The Opportunity Costs of Local Government Organizational Capabilities.” Public Administration Review80 (6): 1024–34.
25.
DeslatteAaronSwannWilliam L.. 2016. "Is the Price Right? Gauging the Marketplace for Local Sustainable Policy Tools.” Journal of Urban Affairs38 (4): 581–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12245.
26.
DeslatteAaronSwannWilliam L.. 2017. “Context Matters: A Bayesian Analysis of How Organizational Environments Shape the Strategic Management of Sustainable Development.” Public Administration95 (3): 807–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12330.
27.
DeslatteAaronTavaresAntónioFeiockRichard C.. 2018. “Policy of Delay: Evidence from a Bayesian Analysis of Metropolitan Land-Use Choices.” Policy Studies Journal46 (3): 674–99.
28.
DonaldBetsyGlasmeierAmyGrayMiaLobaoLinda. 2014. “Austerity in the City: Economic Crisis and Urban Service Decline?” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society7 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst040.
29.
FarmerJayce L.2021. “State-Level Influences on Community-Level Municipal Sustainable Energy Policies.” Urban Affairs ReviewMarch. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087421995262.
30.
FeiockRichard C.TavaresAntónio F.LubellMark. 2008. “Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation.” Policy Studies Journal36 (3): 461–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00277.x.
31.
FloridaRichard.2017. The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class-and What We Can Do About It. New York, New York, USA: Basic Books.
32.
GeorgeBertWalkerRichard M.MonsterJoost. 2019. “Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta-Analysis.” Public Administration Review79 (6): 810–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104.
33.
GoodenSusan T.2017. “Social Equity and Evidence: Insights from Local Government.” Public Administration Review77 (6): 822–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12851.
34.
GoodmanChristopher B.2019a. “Local Government Fragmentation: What Do We Know?” State and Local Government Review51 (2): 134–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X19856933.
35.
GoodmanChristopher B.2019b. “The Fiscal Impacts of Urban Sprawl: Evidence From U.S. County Areas.” Public Budgeting and Finance39 (4): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12239.
36.
GoodmanChristopher B.LelandSuzanne M.. 2019. “Do Cities and Counties Attempt to Circumvent Changes in Their Autonomy by Creating Special Districts?” American Review of Public Administration49 (2): 203–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804665.
37.
GrimmerJ.StewartB. M.. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis21 (3): 267–97.
38.
HardingAlan.1994. “Urban Regimes and Growth Machines Toward a Cross-National Research Agenda.” Urban Affairs Quarterly29 (3): 356–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749402900302.
39.
HawkinsChristopher V.2011. “Smart Growth Policy Choice: A Resource Dependency and Local Governance Explanation.” Policy Studies Journal39 (4): 679–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00427.x.
40.
HawkinsChristopher V.KrauseRachel M.DeslatteAaron. 2023. “Staff Support and Administrative Capacity in Strategic Planning for Local Sustainability.” Public Management Review. 25 (5): 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1999667.
41.
HendrickRebecca M.2011. Managing the Fiscal Metropolis: The Financial Policies, Practices, and Health of Suburban Municipalities. Washington, D.C. USA: Georgetown University Press.
42.
HendrickRebeccaShiYu. 2014. “Macro-Level Determinants of Local Government Interaction: How Metropolitan Regions in the United States Compare.” Urban Affairs Review51 (3): 414–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414530546.
43.
HendrickRebeccaShiYu. 2015. “Is Local Government Fragmentation Good or Bad for Cities? These Indices Will Help Inform the Debate.” USApp - American Politics and Policy Blog, September. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/75808/.
44.
HessDavid J.McKaneRachel G.. 2021. “Making Sustainability Plans More Equitable: An Analysis of 50 U.S Cities.” Local Environment26 (4): 461–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1892047.
45.
HomsyGeorge C.WarnerMildred E.. 2015. “Cities and Sustainability: Polycentric Action and Multilevel Governance.” Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414530545.
46.
Howell-MoroneyMichael.2008. “The Tiebout Hypothesis 50 Years Later: Lessons and Lingering Challenges for Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century.” Public Administration Review68 (1): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00840.x.
47.
HughesSara.2015. “A Meta-Analysis of Urban Climate Change Adaptation Planning in the U.S.” Urban Climate14 (December): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.003.
48.
HughesSara.2020. “Principles, Drivers, and Policy Tools for Just Climate Change Adaptation in Legacy Cities.” Environmental Science & Policy111 (September): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.007.
49.
HughesSaraHoffmannMatthew. 2020. “Just Urban Transitions: Toward a Research Agenda.” WIRES Climate Change11 (3): 115. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.640.
50.
IvankovaNataliya V.CreswellJohn W.StickSheldon L.. 2006. “Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice.” Field Methods18 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260.
51.
JimenezBenedict S.2014. “Separate, Unequal, and Ignored? Interjurisdictional Competition and the Budgetary Choices of Poor and Affluent Municipalities.” Public Administration Review74 (2): 246–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12186.
52.
JimenezBenedict S.2016. “Externalities in the Fragmented Metropolis: Local Institutional Choices and the Efficiency–Equity Trade-Off.” American Review of Public Administration46 (3): 314–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014550703.
53.
JimenezBenedict S.HendrickRebecca. 2010. “Is Government Consolidation the Answer?” State and Local Government Review42 (3): 258–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X10386805.
KruegerSkipBernickEthan M.. 2009. “State Rules and Local Governance Choices.” Publius40 (4): 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjp037.
56.
KuhnK. D.. 2018. “Using Structural Topic Modeling to Identify Latent Topics and Trends in Aviation Incident Reports.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies87: 105–22.
57.
KwonMyungjungTangShui-YanKimCheongsin. 2018. “Examining Strategic Sustainability Plans and Smart-Growth Land-Use Measures in California Cities.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management61 (9): 1570–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1355779.
58.
LiaoLuWarnerMildred E.HomsyGeorge C.. 2019. “Sustainability’s Forgotten Third E: What Influences Local Government Actions on Social Equity?” Local Environment24 (12): 1197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1683725.
59.
LoweryDavid.1998. “Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-Market Failure.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8 (2): 137–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024376.
60.
LoweryDavid.1999. “Sorting in the Fragmented Metropolis: Updating the Social Stratification-Government Inequality Debate.” Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory1 (1): 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037800000002.
61.
LoweryDavidLyonsWilliam E.. 1989. “The Impact of Jurisdictional Boundaries: An Individual-Level Test of the Tiebout Model.” The Journal of Politics51 (1): 73–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131610.
62.
McGinnisMichael D.OstromElinor. 2012. “Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, Public Administration, and Polycentricity.” Public Administration Review72 (1): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02488.x.
63.
MeerowSara.2020. “The Politics of Multifunctional Green Infrastructure Planning in New York City.” Cities100 (May): 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102621.
64.
MeleValentinaBelardinelliPaolo. 2019. “Mixed Methods in Public Administration Research: Selecting, Sequencing, and Connecting.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory29 (3): 334–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy046.
65.
MimnoD.WallachH.TalleyE.LeendersM.McCallumA.. 2011, July. “Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models.” In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 262–72.
66.
MolotchHarvey.1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” The American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/226311.
67.
NelsonArthur C.SanchezThomas W.DawkinsCasey J.. 2004. “The Effect of Urban Containment and Mandatory Housing Elements on Racial Segregation in Us Metropolitan Areas, 1990–2000.” Journal of Urban Affairs26 (3): 339–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00203.x.
68.
OppS. M.SaundersK. L.. 2013. “Pillar Talk: Local Sustainability Initiatives and Policies in the United States—Finding Evidence of the ‘Three E’s’: Economic Development, Environmental Protection, and Social Equity” Urban Affairs Review 49 (5): 678–717. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1078087412469344.
69.
OstromElinor.1983. “The Social Stratification-Government Inequality Thesis Explored.” Urban Affairs Quarterly19 (1): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168301900107.
70.
OstromVincentOstromElinor. 1965. “A Behavioral Approach to the Study of Intergovernmental Relations.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science359 (1): 137–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626535900115.
71.
OttoIlona M.ReckienDianaReyerChristopher P. O.MarcusRachelMassonVirginie LeJonesLindseyNortonAndrewSerdecznyOlivia. 2017. “Social Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Review of Concepts and Evidence.” Regional Environmental Change17 (6): 1651–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1105-9.
72.
PartelowStefan.2016. “Coevolving Ostrom’s Social–Ecological Systems (SES) Framework and Sustainability Science: Four Key Co-Benefits.” Sustainability Science11 (3): 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0351-3.
73.
PoisterTheodore H.2010. “The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector: Linking Strategic Management and Performance.” Public Administration Review70 (December): s246–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x.
74.
PoisterTheodore H.PittsDavid W.EdwardsLauren Hamilton. 2010. “Strategic Management Research in the Public Sector: A Review, Synthesis, and Future Directions.” American Review of Public Administration40 (5): 522–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010370617.
75.
PoisterTheodore H.StreibGregory. 2005. “Elements of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: Status After Two Decades.” Public Administration Review65 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00429.x.
76.
PortneyKent E.2013. Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously: Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities. Cambridge, MA. USA: MIT Press.
77.
PortneyKent E.BerryJeffrey M.. 2010. “Participation and the Pursuit of Sustainability in US Cities.” Urban Affairs Review46 (1): 119–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410366122.
78.
ReamesTony G.2020. “Distributional Disparities in Residential Rooftop Solar Potential and Penetration in Four Cities in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science69 (November): 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101612.
79.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.AiroldiE. M.. 2016. “A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences.” Journal of the American Statistical Association111 (515): 988–1003.
80.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.TingleyD.LucasC.Leder-LuisJ.GadarianS. K.AlbertsonB.RandD. G.. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 1064–82.
81.
SadlerRichard CaseyHighsmithAndrew R.. 2016. “Rethinking Tiebout: The Contribution of Political Fragmentation and Racial/Economic Segregation to the Flint Water Crisis.” Environmental Justice9 (5): 143–51. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2016.0015.
82.
Sanchez RodriguezRobertoÜrge-VorsatzDianaBarauAliyu Salisu. 2018. “Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Change Adaptation in Cities.” Nature Climate Change8 (3): 181–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0098-9.
SchaeferAlexander.2023. “Polycentricity and Adaptation: A Multilevel Selectionist Approach.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization210 (June): 265–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.004.
85.
ShawKeithTheobaldKate. 2011. “Resilient Local Government and Climate Change Interventions in the UK.” Local Environment16 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.544296.
86.
StazykEdmund C.MoldavanovaAlisaFredericksonH. George. 2016. “Sustainability, Intergenerational Social Equity, and the Socially Responsible Organization.” Administration & Society48 (6): 655–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713519094.
87.
SteyversM.GriffithsT.. 2007. "Probabilistic Topic Models." In Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, 439–60. London, UK: Psychology Press.
88.
StokanEricDeslatteAaron. 2020. “Beyond Borders: Governmental Fragmentation and the Political Market for Growth in American Cities.” State and Local Government Review.
89.
StokanEricDeslatteAaronHatchMegan E.. 2021. “Exploring the Trade-Offs Local Governments Make in the Pursuit of Economic Growth and Equity.” Urban Affairs Review 57 (4): 1084–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420926648.
90.
StokanEricHatchMegan E.OvertonMichael. 2023. “Fifty Years as the Fourth Pillar of Public Administration: A Polycentric Extension of the Social Equity Framework.” Public Administration 101 (4): 1427–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12888.
91.
StokanEricOvertonMichaelDeslatteAaronZhangChristine. 2024. “Whose Neighborhood Needs? Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Federal Community Development Funds.” Urban Affairs Review: 60 (3): 983–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874231212843.
92.
SwannWilliam L.DeslatteAaron. 2019. “What Do We Know About Urban Sustainability? A Research Synthesis and Nonparametric Assessment.” Urban Studies. 56 (9) 1729–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018779713.
93.
TavaresAntónio F.RodriguesMiguel. 2015. “The Economic and Political Impacts of top-Down Territorial Reforms: The Case of sub-City Governments.” Local Government Studies41 (6): 956–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1057278.
94.
TeskePaulSchneiderMarkMintromMichaelBestSamuel. 1993. “Establishing The Micro Foundations of a Macro Theory: Information, Movers, and the Competitive Local Market for Public Goods.” The American Political Science Review87 (3): 702–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938745.
95.
TrounstineJessica.2018. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
96.
TumlinJeffrey.2012. Sustainable Transportation Planning: Tools for Creating Vibrant, Healthy, and Resilient Communities. Hoboken, NJ USA: John Wiley & Sons.
97.
ZeemeringEric S.2009. “What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials?” Urban Affairs Review45 (2): 247–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409337297.
