This article examines local sustainability initiatives in the United States through the lens of the “three pillars” of sustainability: economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. A comprehensive index is created using national-level survey data on local sustainability initiatives, then census and other data are used to examine local activities related to all three pillars of sustainability. Analysis of a series of correlations and means comparisons provides evidence that several factors are interrelated with local government engagement in sustainability initiatives, including population size, central city locations, diversity, ethnicity and race, political leanings of a community, and region. In addition, cities are ranked by their scores on this index creating a “best cases” list for future research.
AlkonA.2008. Paradise or pavement: The social constructions of the environment in two urban farmer’s markets and their implications for environmental justice and sustainability. Local Environment13 (3): 271-89.
4.
AgyemanJ.2008. Towards a Just Sustainability? Continuum- Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 22,6: 751-757.
5.
AnglinR.2011. Promoting sustainable local and community economic development. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
6.
BanfieldE.1974. The unheavenly city. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
7.
BetsillM.RabeB.2011. Climate change and multilevel governance: The evolving state and local roles. In Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy, edited by MazmanianD.KraftM., 201-26. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8.
BettencourtK. D.2002. California’s attempt to remain the leader in environmental policy: Regulated carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles in the golden state. McGeorge Law Review34:465-68.
9.
CampbellS.1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (3): 21-33.
10.
ChifosC.2007. The sustainable communities experiment in the United States: Insights from three federal-level Initiatives. Journal of Planning Education and Research26:435-49.
ConroyM.2006. Moving the middle ahead: Challenges and opportunities of sustainability in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. Journal of Planning Education and Research26:18-27.
13.
DavisM. E.2005. Environmental politics in the US: A study of state sulfur dioxide standards. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management7 (3): 331-54.
14.
EmmettR.2006. Malthus reconsidered: Population, natural resources, and markets. PERC Policy Series. http://www.perc.org/pdf/ps38.pdf (accessed September 6, 2012).
15.
FitzgeraldJ.LeighN. G.2002. Economic revitalization: Cases and strategies for city and suburb. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
16.
GoodlandR.1995. The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics26:1-24.
17.
HaughtonG.1999. Environmental justice and the sustainable city. Journal of Planning Education and Research18:233-43.
18.
HeberleL.OppS., eds. 2008. Local sustainable urban development in a globalized world. Aldershot: Ashgate.
19.
HopwoodB.MellorM.O’BrienG.2005. Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development13:38-52.
JepsonE.2004. The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: How wide, how deep, and what role for planners?Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (2): 229-41.
23.
LeiserowitzA.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.HmielowskiJ.2011. Politics and global warming: Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and the tea party. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PoliticsGlobalWarming2011.pdf (accessed on January 3, 2012).
24.
LubellM.FeiockR.HandyS.2009. City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California’s Central Valley. Journal of the American Planning Association74 (3): 293-308.
25.
MazmanianD.KraftM., eds. 2009. Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
NijkampP.PeppingG.1998. A meta-analytical evaluation of sustainable city initiatives. Urban Studies35 (9): 1481-500.
28.
PearsallH.PierceJ.2010. Urban sustainability and environmental justice: Evaluating the linkages in public policy. Local Environment15:569-80.
29.
PetersonP.1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
30.
PierceJ. C.BuddW. W.LovrichN. P.2011. Resilience and sustainability in US urban areas. Environmental Politics20 (4): 566-84.
31.
PortneyK.2003. Taking sustainable cities seriously. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32.
SahaD.2009. Empirical research on local government sustainability efforts in the USA: Gaps in the current literature. Local Environment14 (1): 17-30.
33.
SahaD.PatersonR. G.2008. Local government efforts to promote the “Three E’s” of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research28 (21): 21-37.
34.
SlavinM.2011. Sustainability in America’s cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35.
SlavinM.CodigaD.ZellerJ.2011. Wind, waves, and watts: Creating a clean energy future. In Sustainability in America’s cities, edited by SlavinM., 133-56. Washington, DC: Island Press.
36.
TieboutC.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-24.
37.
VigN.KraftM., eds. 2013. Environmental policy: New directions for the 21st century. Los Angeles: SAGE.
38.
WarnerK.2002. Linking local sustainability initiatives with environmental justice. Local Environment7 (1): 35-47.
39.
WheelerS.BeatleyT.2009. The sustainable urban development reader. New York: Routledge Press.
40.
ZeemringE.2009. What does sustainability mean to city officials?Urban Affairs Review45 (2): 247-73.
