Despite advances in quantitative methodology, many quantitative gentrification scholars rely on under-theorized and speculative presumptions about who gentrifiers are. This study uses Claritas Potential Rating Index for Zip Marketers (PRIZM), a geodemographic marketing data source on the lifestyles and consumer habits of U.S. households, to augment a Census-based analysis of Chicago neighborhoods that gentrified from 2000 to 2017. PRIZM data reveal that the households moving into gentrified neighborhoods represent a range of lifestyles, calling into question the attribution of “gentrifier” to any particular social group or demographic category. In some cases, despite having the same social class positions, gentrifiers pursue varying interests, suggesting they have different effects on neighborhoods. Once lifestyle is accounted for, many assumptions about gentrifiers on which quantitative studies are built become inadequate. The article’s conclusion not only proposes ways in which scholars can integrate geodemographic marketing data into future gentrification research, but it also outlines reasons to be cautious when using the data.
BaderMichaelAilshireJenniferMorenoffJeffreyHouseJames. 2010. “Measurement of the Local Food Environment: A Comparison of Existing Data Sources.” American Journal of Epidemiology171 (5): 609–17.
2.
BaderMichaelMooneyStephenBennettBlakeRundleAndrew. 2017. “The Promise, Practicalities, and Perils of Virtually Auditing Neighborhoods Using Google Street View.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science669 (1): 18–40.
3.
BartonMichael. 2016. “An Exploration of the Importance of the Strategy Used to Identify Gentrification.” Urban Studies53 (1): 92–111.
4.
BartonMichaelCohenIsaiah. 2019. “How Is Gentrification Associated with Changes in the Academic Performance of Neighborhood Schools?” Social Science Research80:230–42.
5.
BeauregardR. A.1990. “Trajectories of Neighborhood Change: The Case of Gentrification.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space22 (7): 855–74.
6.
BetancurJohn. 2011. “Gentrification and Community Fabric in Chicago.” Urban Studies48 (2): 383–406.
7.
BlasiusJörgFriedrichsJürgenRühlHeiko. 2016. “Pioneers and Gentrifiers in the Process of Gentrification.” International Journal of Housing Policy16 (1): 50–69.
8.
BoustanLeah PlattMargoRobertMillerMatthewReevesJamesSteilJustin. 2019. “Does Condominium Development Lead to Gentrification?” Working Paper No. 26170, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
9.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2009. A Neighborhood that Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
10.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2017. “Explicating Divided Approaches to Gentrification and Growing Income Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology43:515–39.
11.
Brown-SaracinoJaponicaRumpfCesraea. 2011. “Diverse Imageries of Gentrification: Evidence from Newspaper Coverage in Seven US Cities, 1986–2006.” Journal of Urban Affairs33 (3): 289–315.
12.
BrummetQuentinReedDavin. 2019. The Effects of Gentrification on the Well-Being and Opportunity of Original Resident Adults and Children. Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
13.
BurrowsRogerGaneNicholas. 2006. “Geodemographics, Software and Class.” Sociology40 (5): 793–812.
14.
ButlerTim. 1997. Gentrification and the Middle Classes. London: Ashgate Publishing.
15.
ButlerTimRobsonGarry. 2001. “Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbourhood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods.” Urban Studies38 (12): 2145–62.
16.
CarlsonH. Jacob. 2020. “Measuring Displacement: Assessing Proxies for Involuntary Residential Mobility.” City & Community. Published electronically January 11. doi:10.1111/cico.12482.
17.
Claritas. 2018. Claritas PRIZM Premier Methodology 2019. Cincinnati: Claritas.
18.
ClayPhillip. 1979. Neighborhood Renewal: Middle-Class Resettlement and Incumbent Upgrading in American Neighborhoods. Lexington: D.C. Heath.
19.
DeenerAndrew. 2007. “Commerce as the Structure and Symbol of Neighborhood Life: Reshaping the Meaning of Community in Venice, California.” City & Community6 (4): 291–314.
20.
DelmelleElizabeth. 2015. “Five Decades of Neighborhood Classifications and Their Transitions: A Comparison of Four US Cities, 1970–2010.” Applied Geography57:1–11.
21.
DingLeiHwangJackelynDivringiEileen. 2016. “Gentrification and Residential Mobility in Philadelphia.” Regional Science and Urban Economics61:38–51.
22.
DouglasGordon C. C.2012. “The Edge of the Island: Cultural Ideology and Neighbourhood Identity at the Gentrification Frontier.” Urban Studies49 (16): 3579–94.
23.
DraganKacieEllenIngridGliedSherry. 2019. “Does Gentrification Displace Poor Children? New Evidence from New York City Medicaid Data.” Working Paper No. 25809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
24.
EllenIngrid GouldO’ReganKatherine. 2011. “How Low-Income Neighborhoods Change: Entry, Exit, and Enhancement.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41 (2): 89–97.
25.
FleischhackerSheilaRodriguezDanielEvensonKellyHenleyAmandaGizliceZiyaSotoDollyRamachandranGowri. 2012. “Evidence for Validity of Five Secondary Data Sources for Enumerating Retail Food Outlets in Seven American Indian Communities in North Carolina.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity9:137.
26.
FloridaRichard. 2014. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
27.
FloridaRichard. 2017. The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class—And What We Can Do About It. New York: Basic Books.
28.
FreemanLance. 2005. “Displacement or Succession? Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review40 (4): 463–91.
29.
FreemanLanceBraconiFrank. 2004. “Gentrification and Displacement New York City in the 1990s.” Journal of the American Planning Association70 (1): 39–52.
30.
GeoLytics. 2019. Neighborhood Change Database. East Brunswick: GeoLytics.
31.
GibbonsJosephBartonMichaelRelingTimothy. 2020. “Do Gentrifying Neighbourhoods Have Less Community? Evidence from Philadelphia.” Urban Studies57:1143–63.
32.
GlaeserEdwardKimHyunjinLucaMichael. 2018. “Measuring Gentrification: Using Yelp Data to Quantify Neighborhood Change.” Working Paper No. 24952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
33.
GossJon. 1995. “‘We Know Who You Are and We Know Where You Live’: The Instrumental Rationality of Geodemographic Systems.” Economic Geography71 (2): 171–98.
34.
HackworthJason. 2002. “Postrecession Gentrification in New York City.” Urban Affairs Review37 (6): 815–43.
35.
HammelDanielWylyElvin. 1996. “A Model for Identifying Gentrified Areas with Census Data.” Urban Geography17 (3): 248–68.
36.
HamnettChris. 1991. “The Blind Men and the Elephant: The Explanation of Gentrification.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers16 (2): 173–89.
37.
HarrisBrandonSchmalzDorothyLarsonLincolnFernandezMarielaGriffinSarah. 2019. “Contested Spaces: Intimate Segregation and Environmental Gentrification on Chicago’s 606 Trail.” City & Community. Published electronically August 6. doi:10.1111/cico.12422.
38.
HartleyDaniel. 2013. “Gentrification and Financial Health.” Cleveland Federal Reserve Working Papers. Accessed April 16, 2020. https://www.clevelandfed.org:443/newsroom and events/publications/economic trends/2013 economic trends/et 20131106 gentrification and financial health.
39.
HwangJackelynSampsonRobert. 2014. “Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods.” American Sociological Review79 (4): 726–51.
40.
KefalasMaria. 2003. Working-Class Heroes: Protecting Home, Community, and Nation in a Chicago Neighborhood. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
41.
KersteinRobert. 1990. “Stage Models of Gentrification: An Examination.” Urban Affairs Quarterly25 (4): 620–39.
42.
KlinenbergEric. 2015. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
MooreKesha. 2009. “Gentrification in Black Face? The Return of the Black Middle Class to Urban Neighborhoods.” Urban Geography30 (2): 118–42.
52.
MorenoffJeffreyTiendaMarta. 1997. “Underclass Neighborhoods in Temporal and Ecological Perspective.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science551 (1): 59–72.
53.
MossHowardKirbySusanDonodeoFred. 2009. “Characterizing and Reaching High-Risk Drinkers Using Audience Segmentation.” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research33 (8): 1336–45.
54.
OcejoRichard. 2011. “The Early Gentrifier: Weaving a Nostalgia Narrative on the Lower East Side.” City & Community10 (3): 285–310.
55.
OwensAnnCandipanJennifer. 2019. “Racial/Ethnic Transition and Hierarchy Among Ascending Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review55 (6): 1550–78.
56.
PapachristosAndrewSmithChrisSchererMaryFugieroMelissa. 2011. “More Coffee, Less Crime? The Relationship between Gentrification and Neighborhood Crime Rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005.” City & Community10 (3): 215–40.
57.
RoseDamaris. 1984. “Rethinking Gentrification: Beyond the Uneven Development of Marxist Urban Theory.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2 (1): 47–74.
58.
SampsonRobert. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
59.
SchlichtmanJohn JoePatchJasonHillMarc Lamont. 2017. Gentrifier. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
60.
SibalisMichael. 2004. “Urban Space and Homosexuality: The Example of the Marais, Paris’ ‘Gay Ghetto.’” Urban Studies41 (9): 1739–58.
SingletonAlexanderSpielmanSeth. 2014. “The Past, Present, and Future of Geodemographic Research in the United States and United Kingdom.” The Professional Geographer66 (4): 558–67.
63.
SlaterTom. 2006. “The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30 (4): 737–57.
64.
SmithNeil. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
65.
SomashekharMahesh. 2019. “Racial Inequality Between Gentrifiers: How the Race of Gentrifiers Affects Retail Development in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” City & Community. Published electronically August 20. doi:10.1111/cico.12421.
66.
SuttonStacey. 2020. “Gentrification and the Increasing Significance of Racial Transition in New York City 1970–2010.” Urban Affairs Review56 (1): 65–95.
67.
TamChristina. 2019. “Beyond the Immigrant Enclave: Differentiating Between Coethnic Neighborhoods for the Study of Health and Social Problems.” GeoJournal84 (4): 983–99.
68.
TimberlakeJeffreyJohns-WolfeElaina. 2017. “Neighborhood Ethnoracial Composition and Gentrification in Chicago and New York, 1980 to 2010.” Urban Affairs Review53 (2): 236–72.
69.
van AltenaVanessaMieijboomJoséTiessensWessel. 2007. The Image Project: New Tools for Neighborhood Regeneration. Delft: City of Delft.
70.
VoasDavidWilliamsonPaul. 2001. “The Diversity of Diversity: A Critique of Geodemographic Classification.” Area33 (1): 63–76.
71.
WebberRichard. 2007. “The Metropolitan Habitus: Its Manifestations, Locations, and Consumption Profiles.” Environment and Planning A39 (1): 182–207.
72.
WeissMichael. 1988. The Clustering of America. New York: Perennial Library.
73.
WeissMichael. 2000. The Clustered World: How We Live, What We Buy, and What It All Means About Who We Are. Boston: Little Brown.
74.
WilsonDavidSternbergCarolina. 2012. “Changing Realities: The New Racialized Redevelopment Rhetoric in Chicago.” Urban Geography33 (7): 979–99.
75.
ZuccaroCataldoSavardMartin. 2010. “Hybrid Segmentation of Internet Banking Users.” International Journal of Bank Marketing28 (6): 448–64.
76.
ZukinSharon. 2014. Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
