Many scholars examine what role cities can play in addressing racial inequality. Yet existing research presents little direct evidence of local political elites’ perceptions of racial inequality and preferred strategies to address it. Which mayors perceive racial inequality to be a problem in their cities, and which mayors prefer substantive rather than symbolic solutions to this problem? To answer this question, we survey more than 100 mayors of large and mid-sized American cities. We find that, while a sizable proportion of mayors advocate for policy change, many others either deny that racial inequality exists, claim that they do not have control over racial inequality, or promote symbolic dialogues about race. Democratic mayors are substantially more likely to acknowledge racial inequality in a variety of domains. Non-White mayors and mayors of cities facing larger racial income inequality are also somewhat more aware of racial inequality, although the relationship is less consistent. Perceptual screens may prevent many mayors from pursuing vigorous policy solutions to racial inequality.
BaumanJohn F.1992. “W. Wilson Goode: The Black Mayor as Urban Entrepreneur.” The Journal of Negro History77 (3): 141–58.
2.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2017. Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. 5th ed.New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
BriffaultRichard. 1990. “Our Localism: Part I—The Structure of Local Government Law.”Columbia Law Review90 (1): 1–115.
4.
BroockmanDavid E.SkovronChristopher. 2018. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review112:542–63.
5.
BrowningRufus P.MarshallDale RogersTabbDavid H.1984. Protest Is not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
6.
CarlstonDonal E.SmithEliot R. 1996. “Principles of Mental Representation.” In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by HigginsE. ToryKruglanskiArie W., 184–210. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
ChambersStefanieNelsonWilliam E. 2014. “Black Mayoral Leadership in New Orleans: Minority Incorporation Revisited.” National Political Science Review16:117–34.
8.
ChambersStefanieSchreiber-StainthorpWill. 2013. “Chapter 7 Michael Coleman: The Midwestern Middleman.” In 21st Century Urban Race Politics: Representing Minorities as Universal Interests, edited by PerryRavi K., 133–62. Bingley: Emerald.
9.
ChettyRajHendrenNathanielKlinePatrickSaezEmmanuel. 2014. “Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1554–623.
10.
CookCorey. 2013. “Chapter 2 Constructing a Moderate Multiracial Coalition in ‘America’s Most Diverse City’: Kevin Johnson and Coalition Politics in Sacramento.” In 21st Century Urban Race Politics: Representing Minorities as Universal Interests, edited by PerryRavi K., 13–31. Bingley: Emerald.
11.
CraigMaureen A.RichesonJennifer A. 2018. “Majority No More? The Influence of Neighborhood Racial Diversity and Salient National Population Changes on Whites’ Perceptions of Racial Discrimination.” The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences4 (5): 141–57.
12.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1124–38.
13.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid M. 2017. “Cities in American Federalism: Evidence on State-Local Government Conflict from a Survey of Mayors.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism47 (4): 599–621.
14.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid M. 2018. “Mayors, Partisanship, and Redistribution: Evidence Directly from U.S. Mayors.”Urban Affairs Review54 (1): 74–106.
15.
EinsteinKatherine LevineKoganVladimir. 2016. “Pushing the City Limits: Policy Responsiveness in Municipal Government.”Urban Affairs Review1 (52): 3–32.
16.
EisingerPeter K.1982. “Black Employment in Municipal Jobs: The Impact of Black Political Power.”American Political Science Review76 (2): 380–92.
17.
FarrisEmily M.HolmanMirya R. 2015. “Public Officials and a ‘Private’ Matter: Attitudes and Policies in the County Sheriff Office Regarding Violence Against Women.”Social Science Quarterly96 (4): 1117–35.
18.
FarrisEmily M.HolmanMirya R. 2017. “All Politics Is Local? County Sheriffs and Localized Policies of Immigration Enforcement.” Political Research Quarterly70 (1): 142–54.
19.
FennoRichard Francis. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. London: Pearson Longman Classics.
20.
FriesemaH. Paul. 1969. “Black Control of Central Cities: The Hollow Prize.”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (2): 75–9.
21.
FrymerPaulStrolovitchDara ZWarrenDorian T. 2006. “New Orleans Is not the Exception: Re-politicizing the Study of Racial Inequality.”Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race3 (1): 37–57.
22.
GerberElisabeth R.2013. “Partisanship and Local Climate Policy.” Cityscape15:107–24.
23.
GerberElisabeth R.HenryAdam DouglasLubellMark. 2013. “Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 598–610.
24.
GerberElisabeth R.HopkinsDaniel J.2011. “When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.”American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 326–39.
HajnalZoltan. 2007. “Black Exceptionalism: Insights from Direct Democracy on the Race vs. Class Debate.”Public Opinion Quarterly71 (4): 560–87.
27.
HopkinsDaniel J.McCabeKatherine T. 2012. “After It’s Too Late: Estimating the Policy Impacts of Black Mayoralties in U.S. Cities.”American Politics Research40 (4): 665–700.
28.
JaffeHarrySherwoodTom. 1994. Dream City: Race, Power, and the Decline of Washington, D.C. New York: Simon & Schuster.
NelsonWilliam E.1992. “Black Mayoral Leadership: A Twenty Year Perspective.” In Enduring Tensions in Urban Politics, edited by JuddDennis R.KantorPaul, 188–95. New York: Macmillan.
47.
NelsonWilliam E.MerantoPhilip J. 1977. Electing Black Mayors: Political Action in the Black Community. Columbus: The Ohio State Univ. Press.
48.
NivolaPietro S.1996. Tense Commandments: Federal Prescriptions and City Problems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
49.
NortonMichael I.SommersSamuel R. 2011. “Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game that They Are Now Losing.” Perspectives on Psychological Science6 (3): 215–18.
50.
NyeJohn V.RainerIliaStratmannThomas. 2010. “Do Black Mayors Improve Black Employment Outcomes? Evidence from Large U.S. Cities.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization31:383–430.
51.
OgorzalekThomas K.2018. The Cities on the Hill: How Urban Institutions Transformed National Politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
52.
PerryHuey L.1991. “Deracialization as an Analytical Construct in American Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review27 (2): 181–91.
53.
PerryRavi K.2013. “Deracialization Reconsidered: Theorizing Targeted Universalistic Urban Politics.” In 21st Century Urban Race Politics: Representing Minorities as Universal Interests, edited by PerryRavi K., xxiii–xliii. Bingley: Emerald.
54.
PerryRavi K.Owens-JonesAndrea. 2013. “Chapter 9 Balancing Act: Racial Empowerment and the Dual Expectations of Jack Ford in Toledo, Ohio.” In 21st Century Urban Race Politics: Representing Minorities as Universal Interests, edited by PerryRavi K., 181–200. Bingley: Emerald.
55.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
56.
Pew Research Center. 2013. King’s Dream Remains an Elusive Goal: Many Americans See Racial Disparities. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
57.
PhoenixDavin L.2013. “Chapter 6 the Mile High Difference: Examining the Impact of Political and Institutional Context on the Electoral Strategies Pursued by Minority Mayors in Denver, and the Impacts of Those Strategies on Minority Communities.” In 21st Century Urban Race Politics: Representing Minorities as Universal Interests, edited by PerryRavi K., 111–32. Bingley: Emerald.
58.
QuillianLincolnDevahPagerHexelOleMidtbøenArnfinn H.2017. “Meta-analysis of Field Experiments Shows No Change in Racial Discrimination in Hiring over Time.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114 (41): 10870–75.
59.
RothsteinRichard. 2017. The Color of Law. New York: W.W. Norton.
60.
SaltzsteinGrace Hall. 1989. “Black Mayors and Police Policies.” The Journal of Politics51 (3): 525–44.
SchaffnerBrian F.MacwilliamsMatthewNtetaTatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly113 (1): 9–34.
63.
SegalJeffrey A.CoverAlbert D. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review83 (2): 557–65.
64.
ShefferLiorLoewenPeter JohnSorokaStuartWalgraveStefaanSheaferTamir. 2018. “Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians.” American Political Science Review112 (2): 302–21.
65.
SossJoeWeaverVesla. 2017. “Police Are Our Government: Politics, Political Science, and the Policing of Race–Class Subjugated Communities.” Annual Review of Political Science20:565–91.
66.
StoneClarence Nathan. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
67.
SugrueThomas J.2014. The Origins of the Urban Crisis. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
68.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108:605–41.
69.
TrounstineJessica. 2016. “Segregation and Inequality in Public Goods.” American Journal of Political Science60 (3): 709–25.
70.
TrounstineJessica. 2018. Segregation by Design. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
71.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2007. Census of Governments. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
72.
WilliamsLinda Faye. 2003. The Constraint of Race: Legacies of White Skin Privilege. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
73.
WilliamsonAbigail Fisher. 2018. Welcoming New Americans? Local Governments and Immigrant Incorporation. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
