This article investigates the role of urban political economy, private-public property relations, and race and ethnicity in the social production of Milwaukee's urban forest. By integrating urban-forest canopy-cover data from aerial photography, United States Census data, and qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews, this analysis suggests that there is an inequitable distribution of urban canopy cover within Milwaukee. Since urban trees positively affect quality of life, the spatially inequitable distribution of urban trees in relation to race and ethnicity is yet another instance of urban environmental inequality that deserves greater consideration in light of contemporary and dynamic property relations within capitalist societies.
American Forests. 1996. Urban ecological analysis for Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Washington, DC: American Forests.
2.
Anderson, L. M., and H. K. Cordell. 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning15: 153–164.
3.
Benton, T.1996. Marxism and natural limits: An ecological critique and reconstruction. In The Greening of Marxism, edited by T. Benton, 157–186. New York: Guilford.
4.
Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
5.
Bullard, R.1990. Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
Castree, N.2000. Marxism and the production of nature. Capital & Class72: 5–37.
7.
Cook, D. I.1978. Trees, solid barriers, and combinations: Alternatives for noise control. In Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference, edited by G. Hopkins, 330–339. New York: USDA Forest Service, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry.
8.
Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S.Naeem, R. V.O'Neill, J.Paruelo, R. G.Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature387: 253–260.
9.
Craig, W., T. Harris, and D. Weiner, eds. 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor & Francis.
10.
Cronon, W.1991. Nature's metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W. W. Norton.
11.
Daly, H., and J. B. Cobb. 1994. For the common good. Boston: Beacon.
12.
Desfor, G., and R. Keil. 2005. Nature and the city: Making environmental policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.
13.
Di Chiro, G.1996. Nature as community: The convergence of environment and social justice. In Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature, edited by W. Cronon, 298–320. New York: W. W. Norton.
14.
Dobson, A.1999. Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
15.
Dorney, J. R., G. R. Guntenspergen, J. R. Keough, and F. Stearns. 1984. Composition and structure of an urban woody plant community. Urban Ecology8: 69–90.
16.
Elliot, J., and M. Sims. 2001. Ghettos and barrios: The impact of neighborhood poverty and race on job matching among Blacks and Latinos. Social Problems48: 341–361.
17.
Emmanuel, R.1997. Urban vegetational changes as an indicator of demographic trends in cities: The case of Detroit. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24: 415–426.
18.
Faber, D., ed. 1998. The struggle for ecological democracy: Environmental justice movement in United States. New York: Guilford.
19.
Foster, J.2000. Marx's ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
20.
Gandy, M.2002. Concrete and clay: Reworking nature in New York City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Girdner, E. J., and J. Smith. 2002. Killing me softly: Toxic waste, corporate profit and the struggle for environmental justice. New York: Monthly Review Press.
22.
Gurda, J.1999. The making of Milwaukee. Brookfield, WI: Milwaukee County Historical Society.
23.
Harvey, D.1982. The limits to capital. New ed.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Reprint.
24.
Harvey, D.1989. The urban experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
25.
Harvey, D.1996. Justice, nature & the geography of difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26.
Heisler, G. M.1986. Energy savings with trees. Journal of Arboriculture12: 113–125.
27.
Heynen, N.2003. The scalar production of injustice within the urban forest. Antipode: A Journal of Radical Geography35 (5): 980–998.
28.
Heynen, N.2006. Green urban political ecologies: Toward a better understanding of inner city environmental change. Environment and Planning A38 (3): 499–516.
29.
Heynen, N., M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw. 2006. In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. New York: Routledge.
30.
Heynen, N., and G. Lindsey. 2003. Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: Implications for local public works. Public Works Management and Policy8 (1): 33–47.
31.
Heynen, N., and H. Perkins. 2005. Scalar dialectics in green: Urban private property and the contradictions of the neoliberalization of nature. Capitalism Nature Socialism16 (1): 99–113.
32.
Heynen, N., and P. Robbins. 2005. The neoliberalization of nature: Governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation. Capitalism Nature Socialism16 (1): 5–8.
33.
Iverson, L. R., and E. A. Cook. 2000. Urban forest cover of the Chicago region and its relation to household density and income. Urban Ecosystems4: 105–124.
34.
Jim, C. Y.2004. Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities21 (4): 311–320.
35.
Johnson, C. W.1988. Planning for avian wildlife in urbanizing areas in America desert/mountain valley environments. Landscape and Urban Planning16: 245–252.
36.
Kaika, M.2005. City of flows: Modernity, nature and the city. New York: Routledge.
37.
Keil, R.1995. The environmental problematic in world cities. In World cities in a world system, edited by P. Knox and P. Taylor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
38.
Keil, R.2003. Urban political ecology. Urban Geography24: 723–738.
39.
Keil, R., and G. Desfor. 2003. Ecological modernization in Los Angeles and Toronto. Local Environment8 (1): 27–44.
40.
Keil, R., G. Werkerle, and D. Bell, eds. 1996. Local places in the age of the global city. Montreal: Black Rose.
41.
Kweon, B. S., W. C. Sullivan, and A. R. Wiley. 1998. Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior30 (6): 832–858.
42.
Lefebvre, H.1991. The production of space. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
43.
Lefebvre, H.1996. Writings on cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
44.
Lefebvre, H.2003. The urban revolution. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
45.
Lejano, R., and H. Iseki. 2001. Environmental justice: Spatial distribution of hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Planning and Development127: 51–62.
46.
Luke, T.2003. Global cities vs. “global cities”: Rethinking contemporary urbanism and public ecology. Studies in Political Economy Spring:11–33.
47.
Marx, K.1867. Capital: A critique of political economy, Vol 1. Translated by B. Fowkes. New York: Penguin. Reprint, 1976.
48.
Massey, D., and N. Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
49.
McCarthy, J., and S. Prudham. 2004. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum35 (3): 275–283.
50.
McPherson, E. G.1990. Modeling residential landscape water and energy use to evaluate water conservation policies. Journal of Landscape9:122–134.
51.
Meier, A. K.1991. Measured cooling savings from vegetative landscapes. In Energy efficiency and the environment: Forging the link, edited by E. Vine, D. Crawley, and P. Centolella, 321–334. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
52.
Nowak D. J., and E. G. McPherson. 1993. Quantifying the impact of trees: The Chicago urban forest climate program. Unasylva44: 39–47.
53.
Nowak, D. J., R. A. Rowntree, E. G. Mcpherson, S. M. Sisinni, E. R. Kerkmann, and J. C. Stevens. 1996. Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning36: 49–57.
54.
Odland, J.1982. A statistical model for the development of spatial patterns: Applications to the spread of housing deterioration. Geographical Analysis14: 326–339.
55.
Oke, T. R.1989. The micrometeorology of the urban forest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences324: 335–349.
56.
Pedlowski, M. A., V. A. Carneiro Dasilva, J. J. C. Adell, and N. C. Heynen. 2002. Urban forest and environmental inequality in Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 6 (1-2): 9–20.
57.
Perkins, H. A., N. Heynen, and J. Wilson. 2004. Inequity in an urban reforestation program: The impact of housing tenure on urban forests. Cities21 (4): 291–299.
58.
Pulido, L.1996. Environmentalism and economic justice: Two Chicano struggles in the Southwest. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.
59.
Rindfuss, R. R., and P. C. Stearn. 1998. Linking remote sensing and social science: The need and the challenges. In People and pixels: Remote sensing and social science, edited by D. Liverman et al., 1–27. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
60.
Robbins, P.2003. Beyond ground truth: GIS and the environmental knowledge of herders, professional foresters, and other traditional communities. Human Ecology31 (1): 233–254.
61.
Robbins, P., A. Polderman, and T. Birkenholtz. 2001. An ecology of the city. Cities18 (6): 369–380.
62.
Rowntree, R. A.1986. Ecology of the urban forest—Introduction to part II. Urban Ecology9: 229–243.
63.
Rowntree, R. A., and D. J. Nowak. 1991. Quantifying the role of urban forests in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture17: 269–275.
64.
Sanders, R. A.1986. Urban vegetation impacts on the hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urban Ecology9: 361–376.
65.
Schmid, J. A.1975. Urban vegetation. Chicago: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.
66.
Schmidt, A.1971. The concept of nature in Marx. London: NLB.
67.
Schroeder, H. W.1989. Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Environmental Psychology11: 231–248.
68.
Smith, N.1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
69.
Smith, W. H.1990. Air pollution and forests. New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
70.
Swyngedouw, E.1999. Modernity and hybridity: The production of nature, water, modernisation in Spain. Annals of the Association of American Geographers89: 443–465.
71.
Swyngedouw, E.2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
72.
Swyngedouw, E., and N. Heynen. 2003. Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode35: 898–918.
73.
Swyngedouw, E., M. Kaika, and E. Castro. 2002. Urban water: A political-ecology perspective. Built Environment28 (2): 124–137.
74.
Szasz, A.1994. EcoPopulism: Toxic waste and the movement for environmental justice. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
75.
Talarchek, G. M.1990. The urban forest of New Orleans: An exploratory analysis of relationships. Urban Geography11: 65–86.
76.
Talen, E.1997. The social equity of urban service distribution: An exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado, and Macon, Georgia. Urban Geography18 (6): 521–541.
77.
Taylor, A. F., A. Wiley, F. E. Kuo, and W. C. Sullivan. 1998. Growing up in the inner-city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior. 30 (1): 3–27.
78.
Turner, M. D.2003. Methodological reflections on the use of remote sensing and geographic information science in human ecological research. Human Ecology31 (2): 255–279.
79.
Ulrich, R. S.1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science224: 420–421.
80.
United States Census Bureau. 2000. Population Census: Milwaukee, WI.
81.
Wenz, P. S.1988. Environmental justice. New York: State Univ. of New York Press.
82.
Williams, R.1973. The country and the city. London: Hogarth.
