I use over-time variation resulting from geographic sorting to estimate the impact of local preferences on local policy. Building a new panel data set of county-level voting behavior and county-level policy choices, I find a causal impact of changes in preferences on changes in policy. However, this responsiveness is not unlimited. While public safety and infrastructure spending respond, policies more constrained by state laws do not; and while general purpose government spending is responsive, school and special district spending are not. These results corroborate recent evidence of local responsiveness using a more extensive sample, and a research design that rules out many alternative explanations. They also reveal many local policies to be unresponsive due to state-imposed constraints.
AbramsSamuel J.FiorinaMorris P. “‘The Big Sort’ That Wasn’t: A Skeptical Reexamination.” PS: Political Science & Politics45 (2): 203–10.
2.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1962. State Constitutional and Statutory Restrictions on Local Taxing Powers. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
3.
AllardScottBurnsNancyGammGerald. 1998. “Representing Urban Interests: The Local Politics of State Legislatures.” Studies in American Political Development12 (2): 267–302.
ArnoldR. DouglasCarnesNicholas. 2012. “Holding Mayors Accountable: New York’s Executives from Koch to Bloomberg.” American Journal of Political Science56(4): 949-963.
6.
AnsolabehereStephenSnyderJames M.2006. “Party Control of State Government and the Distribution of Public Expenditures.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics108 (4): 547–69.
7.
AnziaSarah F.MoeTerry M.2015. “Public Sector Unions and the Costs of Government.” The Journal of Politics77 (1): 114–27.
8.
BafumiJosephHerronMichael C.2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.” American Political Science Review104 (3): 519–42.
9.
BarnettJeffrey L.SheckellsCindy L.PetersonScottTydingsElizabeth M.2014. “2012 Census of Governments: Finance—State and Local Government Summary Report.” U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed June 27, 2016. https://www2.census.gov/govs/local/summary_report.pdf.
10.
BerkmanMichael B.PlutzerEric. 2005. Ten Thousand Democracies: Politics and Public Opinion in America’s School Districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
11.
BerryChristopher R.2008. “Piling On: Multilevel Government and the Fiscal Common-Pool.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 802–20.
BishopBillCushingRobert G.2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
16.
BoudreauCherylElmendorfChristopher S.MacKenzieScott A.2015. “Lost in Space? Information Shortcuts, Spatial Voting, and Local Government Representation.” Political Research Quarterly68 (4): 843–55.
17.
BurnsNancy. 1994. The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
ChoiSang OkBaeSang-SeokKwonSung-WookFeiockRichard. 2010. “County Limits: Policy Types and Expenditure Priorities.” The American Review of Public Administration40 (1): 29–45.
20.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and the Size of Municipal Government.” The Journal of Politics78:1124–38.
21.
EinsteinKatherine LevineKoganVladimir. 2016. “Pushing the City Limits: Policy Responsiveness in Municipal Government.” Urban Affairs Review52 (1): 3–32.
22.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
23.
GerberElisabeth R.2013. “Partisanship and Local Climate Policy.” Cityscape15 (1): 107–24.
24.
GerberElisabeth R.HopkinsDaniel J.2011. “When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 326–39.
25.
GlaeserEdward L.WardBryce A.2006. “Myths and Realities of American Political Geography.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives20 (2): 119–44.
26.
GuryanJonathan. 2001. “Desegregation and Black Dropout Rates.” Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed June 27, 2016. www.nber.org/papers/w8345.pdf.
27.
HajnalZoltan L.TrounstineJessica. 2010. “Who or What Governs? The Effects of Economics, Politics, Institutions, and Needs on Local Spending.” American Politics Research38 (6): 1130–63.
HughesSaraRunfolaDaniel MillerCormierBenjamin. 2018. “Issue Proximity and Policy Response in Local Governments.” Review of Policy Research35 (2): 192–212.
JacksonC. KiraboJohnsonRucker C.PersicoClaudia. 2016. “The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics131 (1): 157–218.
32.
KoganVladimir. 2017. “Administrative Centralization and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Evidence from the Food Stamp Program.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory27 (4): 629–46.
33.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2009. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 107–21.
34.
LenzGabriel S.2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1988. “The Dimensions of Residential Segregation.” Social Forces67 (2): 281–315.
37.
MatsusakaJohn G.2010. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science5 (2): 133–67.
38.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2009. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?” American Journal of Political Science53 (3): 666–80.
39.
MinkoffScott L.2009. “Minding Your Neighborhood: The Spatial Context of Local Redistribution.” Social Science Quarterly90 (3): 516–37.
40.
MullinMegan. 2009. Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41.
MummoloJonathanNallClayton. 2017. “Why Partisans Don’t Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation.” The Journal of Politics79:45–59.
42.
NallClayton. 2015. “The Political Consequences of Spatial Policies: How Interstate Highways Facilitated Geographic Polarization.” The Journal of Politics77 (2): 394–406.
OatesWallace E.2006. “The Many Faces of the Tiebout Model.” In The Tiebout Model at Fifty: Essays in Public Economics in Honor of Wallace Oates, edited by FischelWilliam A.OatesWallace E., 21–45. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
45.
PalusChristine Kelleher. 2010. “Responsiveness in American Local Governments.” State and Local Government Review42 (2): 133–50.
46.
ParkDavid K.GelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12 (4): 375–85.
47.
PeltzmanSam. 1980. “The Growth of Government.” The Journal of Law & Economics23 (2): 209–87.
48.
PercivalGarrick L.JohnsonMartinNeimanMax. 2009. “Representation and Local Policy: Relating County-Level Public Opinion to Policy Outputs.” Political Research Quarterly62 (1): 164–77.
49.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
50.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward L.2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
51.
PoterbaJames M.1997. “Demographic Structure and the Political Economy of Public Education.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management16 (1): 48–66.
52.
SancesMichael W.2018. “Ideology and Vote Choice in U.S. Mayoral Elections: Evidence from Facebook Surveys.” Political Behavior40 (3): 737–62.
53.
SolonGaryHaiderSteven J.WooldridgeJeffrey M.2015. “What Are We Weighting For?” The Journal of Human Resources50 (2): 301–16.
54.
SussellJesseThomsonJames A.2015. “Are Changing Constituencies Driving Rising Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Accessed June 24, 2016. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR896.html.
55.
SwitzerDavid. 2019. “Citizen Partisanship, Local Government, and Environmental Policy Implementation.” Urban Affairs Review55 (3): 675–702.
56.
TamChoK.WendyGimpelJames G.HuiIris S.2013. “Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers103 (4): 856–70.
57.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” The Journal of Politics75 (2): 330–42.
58.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–41.
59.
TheriaultSean M.2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
60.
TieboutCharles M.1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416–24.
WinklerRichelleJohnsonKenneth M.ChengChengBeaudoinJimVossPaul R.CurtisKatherine J.2013. “Age-Specific Net Migration Estimates for U.S. Counties, 1950-2010.” Applied Population Laboratory, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison. Accessed May 26, 2017. http://netmigration.wisc.edu/.
65.
WrightGerald C.EriksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.1987. “Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science31 (4): 980–1001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
