Scholarship has explored how descriptive representation translates into substantive representation in American schools with mixed findings. I argue here that electoral institutions condition this relationship between descriptive and substantive representation, with Hispanic representatives elected to serve single-member districts providing better representation for bilingual students than their at-large counterparts, particularly when demand for bilingual programming is high. Using data from urban school campuses in Texas from 2003 to 2011, I seek to assess how the interaction between electoral institutions, descriptive representation, and demand affects substantive representation, here measured as bilingual funding. Results demonstrate that Hispanic representatives, elected to serve either at-large or a single-member district, have a positive effect on campus bilingual funding when there is low demand for the program. Yet, only Hispanic representatives elected to serve single-member districts substantively represent bilingual constituencies when there is high demand.
AjwadMohamed Ihsan. 2006. “Is Intrajurisdictional Resource Allocation Equitable? An Analysis of Campus-Level Spending Data for Texas Elementary Schools.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance46 (4): 552–64.
3.
BoustanLeah PlattFerreiraFernandoWinklerHernanZoltEric. 2010. “Income Inequality and Local Government in the United States, 1970-2000.” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
4.
CasellasJason P.2009. “The Institutional and Demographic Determinants of Latino Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (3): 399–426.
5.
DeHoogRuth Hoogland. 1997. “Urban Service Delivery.” In Handbook of Research on Urban Politics and Policy in the United States, edited by VogelRonald, 197–209. Westport: Greenwood Press.
6.
EndersCraig K.TofighiDavood. 2007. “Centering Predictor Variables in Cross-Sectional Multilevel Models: A New Look at an Old Issue.” Psychological Methods12 (2): 121–38.
7.
FlinkCarla M.MolinaAngel Luis. 2016. “Politics or Professionalism? Budgeting for Bilingual Education.” Urban Affairs Review53 (6): 1064–87.
8.
HertertLinda. 1994. “Resource Allocation Patterns in Public Education: An Analysis of School-Level Equity in California.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles.
9.
HuddyLeonieSearsDavid O.1990. “Qualified Public Support for Bilingual Education: Some Policy Implications.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science508 (1): 119–34.
10.
JonesClinton B.1976. “The Impact of Local Election Systems on Black Political Representation.” Urban Affairs Review11 (3): 345–56.
11.
KarnigAlbert K.1976. “Black Representation on City Councils: The Impact of District Elections and Socioeconomic Factors.” Urban Affairs Review12 (2): 223–42.
12.
KarnigAlbert K.1979. “Black Resources and City Council Representation.” Journal of Politics41 (1): 134–49.
13.
KarnigAlbert K.WelchSusan. 1982. “Electoral Structure and Black Representation on City Councils.” Social Science Quarterly63:99–114.
14.
KeiserLael R.WilkinsVicky M.MeierKenneth J.HollandCatherine A.2002. “Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review96 (3): 553–64.
15.
LealDavidHessFrederick M.2000. “The Politics of Bilingual Education Expenditures in Urban School Districts.” Social Science Quarterly81 (4): 1064–72.
16.
LealDavidMartinez-EbersValerieMeierKenneth J.2004. “The Politics of Latino Education: The Biases of At-large Elections.” Journal of Politics66 (4): 1224–44.
17.
LevyFrankMeltsnerArnold J.WildavskyAaron B.1974. Urban Outcomes: Schools, Streets, and Libraries. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
18.
LineberryRobert L.1977. Equality and Urban Policy: The Distribution of Municipal Public Services. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
19.
MacManusSusan A.1978. “City Council Election Procedures and Minority Representation: Are They Related?” Social Science Quarterly59 (1): 153–61.
20.
MarschallMelissa J.RuhilAnirudhShahParu R.2010. “The New Racial Calculus: Electoral Institutions and Black Representation in Local Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 107–24.
21.
MasseyDouglasDentonNancy. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
22.
MeierKenneth J.1993. “Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory3 (4): 393–414.
23.
MeierKenneth J.JuenkeEric GonzalezWrinkleRobert D.PolinardJ. L.2005. “Structural Choices and Representational Biases: The Post-election Color of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 758–68.
24.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.2006. “Political Control Versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate.” Public Administration Review66 (2): 177–92.
25.
MeierKenneth J.RutherfordAmanda. 2014. “Partisanship, Structure, and Representation: The Puzzle of African American Education Politics.” American Political Science Review108 (2): 265–80.
26.
MeierKenneth J.RutherfordAmanda. 2016. The Politics of African-American Education: Representation, Partisanship, and Educational Equity. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
27.
MeierKenneth J.WrinkleRobert D.PolinardJerry L.1999. “Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question.” Journal of Politics61 (4): 1025–39.
28.
NezlekJohn B.2012. “Multilevel Modeling Analyses of Diary-Style Data.” In Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life, edited by MehlMatthias R.ConnerTamlin S., 357–83. New York: Guilford Press.
29.
PitkinHanna F.1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
30.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
31.
RobinsonScott E.2002. “Rules, Roles, and Minority Representation: The Dynamics of Budgeting for Bilingual Education in Texas.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly2 (1): 52–65.
32.
RobinsonTheodore P.DyeThomas R.1978. “Reformism and Black Representation on City Councils.” Social Science Quarterly59 (1): 133–41.
33.
RochaRene R.HawesDaniel P.2009. “Racial Diversity, Representative Bureaucracy, and Equity in Multiracial School Districts.” Social Science Quarterly90 (2): 326–44.
34.
RochaRene R.WrinkleRobert D.2011. “Gender, Ethnicity, and Support for Bilingual Education: Will Just Any Woman or Latino Do? A Contingent ‘No.’” Policy Studies Journal39 (2): 309–28.
35.
RubensteinRossSchwartzAmy EllenStiefelLeannaHadj AmorHella Bel. 2007. “From Districts to Schools: The Distribution of Resources Across Schools in Big City School Districts.” Economics of Education Review26 (5): 532–45.
36.
ShahParu. 2010. “Racing Toward Representation: A Hurdle Model of Latino Incorporation.” American Politics Research38 (1): 84–109.
37.
StewartJosephJr.EnglandRobert E.MeierKenneth J.1989. “Black Representation in Urban School Districts: From School Board to Office to Classroom.” Western Political Quarterly42 (2): 287–305.
38.
StiefelLeannaRubensteinRossBerneRobert. 1998. “Intra-district Equity in Four Large Cities: Data, Methods and Results.” Journal of Education Finance23 (4): 447–67.
39.
TaebelDelbert. 1978. “Minority Representation on City Councils: The Impact of Structure on Blacks and Hispanics.” Social Science Quarterly59 (1): 142–52.
40.
TheobaldNick A.2007. “¡Mue’streme el Dinero! Assessing the Linkage Between Latino School Superintendents and English-Language Learner Program Resources.” In Latino Politics: Identity, Mobilization, and Representation, edited by EspinoRodolfoLealDavid L.MeierKenneth J., 249–64. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press.
41.
WelchSusan. 1990. “The Impact of At-large Elections on the Representation of Blacks and Hispanics.” Journal of Politics52 (4): 1050–76.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
