What are the local-level impacts of zoning change? I study recent Chicago upzonings that increased allowed densities and reduced parking requirements in a manner exogenous of development plans and neighborhood characteristics. To evaluate outcomes, I use difference-in-differences tests on property transaction prices and housing-unit construction permits. I detect significant, robust increases in values for transactions on parcels that received a boost in allowed building size. I also identify value increases for residential condominiums, indicating that upzoning increased prices of existing housing units. I find no impacts of the reforms, however, on the number of newly permitted dwellings over five years. As such, I demonstrate that the short-term, local-level impacts of upzoning are higher property prices but no additional new housing construction.
AngottiTom. 2016. “Land Use and Zoning Matter.” In Zoned Out! edited by AngottiTomMorseSylvia, 18–44. New York: Terreform.
2.
Atkinson-PalomboCarol. 2010. “Comparing the Capitalisation Benefits of Light-Rail Transit and Overlay Zoning for Single-Family Houses and Condos by Neighborhood Type in Metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona.” Urban Studies47 (11): 2409–26. doi:10.1177/0042098009357963.
3.
BeenVickiEllenIngrid GouldGedalMichaelGlaeserEdwardMcCabeBrian. 2016. “Preserving History or Restricting Development? The Heterogeneous Effects of Historic Districts on Local Housing Markets in New York City.” Journal of Urban Economics92:16–30. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.002.
4.
BeenVickiMadarJosiahMcDonnellSimon. 2014. “Urban Land-Use Regulation: Are Homevoters Overtaking the Growth Machine?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies11 (2): 227–65. doi:10.1111/jels.12040.
5.
ChakrabortyArnabKnaapGerrit-JanNguyenDoanShinJung Ho. 2010. “The Effects of High-Density Zoning on Multifamily Housing Construction in the Suburbs of Six US Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Studies47 (2): 437–51. doi:10.1177/0042098009348325.
EmanuelRahm. 2015. Emanuel Administration Second Term Priorities Committee: Recommendations for the Next Four Years. Chicago: City of Chicago.
12.
FeinDavid. 1985. “Historic Districts: Preserving City Neighborhoods for the Privileged.” New York University Law Review60:64–103.
13.
FischelWilliam A.2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
14.
FischelWilliam A.2015. Zoning Rules! The Economics of Land Use Regulation. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
15.
FreemanLanceSchuetzJenny. 2017. “Producing Affordable Housing in Rising Markets: What Works?” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research19 (1): 217–36.
16.
FreemarkYonah. 2018. “Challenges in the Creation of Mixed-Use Affordable Housing: Measuring and Explaining Its Limited Prevalence.” Housing Policy Debate28 (6): 1004–21. doi:10.1080/10511482.2018.1506813.
17.
FurmanJason. 2015. “Barriers to Shared Growth: The Case of Land Use Regulation and Economic Rents.” The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
18.
GabbeC. J.2017. “How Do Developers Respond to Land Use Regulation? An Analysis of New Housing in Los Angeles.” Housing Policy Debate28 (3): 411–27. doi:10.1080/10511482.2017.1368031.
19.
GlaeserEdward. 2012. Triumph of the City. New York: Penguin Books.
20.
GlaeserEdwardGyourkoJoseph. 2002. “The Impact of Zoning on Housing Affordability.” Working Paper No. 8835, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. doi:10.3386/w8835.
21.
GlaeserEdwardWardBryce A.2009. “The Causes and Consequences of Land Use Regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston.” Journal of Urban Economics65 (3): 265–78. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003.
22.
GyourkoJosephSaizAlbertSummersAnita A.2008. “A New Measure of the Local Regulatory Environment for Housing Markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index.” Urban Studies45 (3): 693–729. doi:10.1177/0042098007087341.
23.
HirtSonia A.2014. Zoned in the USA: The Origins and Implications of American Land-Use Regulation. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
24.
IhlanfeldtKeith R.2007. “The Effect of Land Use Regulation on Housing and Land Prices.” Journal of Urban Economics61:420–35. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.09.003.
25.
KokNilsMonkkonenPaavoQuigleyJohn M.2014. “Land Use Regulations and the Value of Land and Housing: An Intra-metropolitan Analysis.” Journal of Urban Economics81:136–48. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004.
26.
LensMichael C.MonkkonenPaavo. 2016. “Do Strict Land Use Regulations Make Metropolitan Areas More Segregated by Income?” Journal of the American Planning Association82 (1): 6–21. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1111163.
27.
MalpezziStephenWachterSusan M.2005. “The Role of Speculation in Real Estate Cycles.” Journal of Real Estate Literature13 (2): 141–64.
28.
MayerChristopher J.SomervilleC. Tsuriel. 2000. “Land Use Regulation and New Construction.” Regional and Urban Economics30 (6): 639–62. doi:10.1016/s0166-0462(00)00055-7.
29.
McKinsey Global Institute.2014. “A Blueprint for Addressing the Global Affordable Housing Shortage.” New York.
30.
MolotchHarvey. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309–32. doi:10.1086/226311.
31.
MorrowGregory. 2013. “The Homeowner Revolution: Democracy, Land Use and the Los Angeles Slow-Growth Movement, 1965-1992.” Doctoral dissertation. Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
NelsonArthur C.PendallRolfDawkinsCasey J.KnappGerrit J.2002. “The Link Between Growth Management and Housing Affordability: The Academic Evidence.” Discussion Paper for the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. Washington: Brookings.
34.
PendallRolf. 2000. “Local Land Use Regulation and the Chain of Exclusion.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (2): 125–42. doi:10.1080/01944360008976094.
35.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922645.001.0001.
PollakowskiHenry O.WachterSusan M.1990. “The Effects of Land-Use Constraints on Housing Prices.” Land Economics66 (3): 315–24. doi:10.2307/3146732.
38.
QuigleyJohn M.Raphael S.Steven2005. “Regulation and the High Cost of Housing in California.” American Economic Review95 (2): 323–28. doi:10.1257/000282805774670293.
39.
QuigleyJohn M.RosenthalLarry A.2005. “The Effects of Land Use Regulation on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn?” Cityscape8 (1): 69–137.
40.
RothwellJonathanMasseyDouglas S.2009. “The Effect of Density Zoning on Racial Segregation in U.S. Urban Areas.” Urban Affairs Review44 (6): 779–806. doi:10.1177/1078087409334163.
41.
SchillMichael H.2005. “Regulations and Housing Development: What We Know.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research8 (1): 5–20.
42.
SchleicherDavid. 2013. “City Unplanning.” Yale Law Journal122 (7): 1670–1737.
43.
SchwietermanJoseph P.CaspallDana M.2006. The Politics of Place: A History of Zoning in Chicago. Edited by HeronJane. Chicago: Lake Claremont Press.
44.
ShertzerAllisonTwinamTateWalshRandall. 2016. “Zoning and the Economic Geography of Cities.” Working Paper No. 22658, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. doi:10.3386/w22658.
ThorsonJames A.1997. “The Effect of Zoning on Housing Construction.” Journal of Housing Economics6 (1): 81–91. doi:10.1006/jhec.1997.0205.
47.
WeissMarc Allan. 1987. The Rise of the Community Builders. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
48.
White House. 2016. Housing Development Toolkit. Washington, DC: White House.
49.
Wolf-PowersLaura. 2005. “Up-Zoning New York City’s Mixed-Use Neighborhoods.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (4): 379–93. doi:10.1177/0739456x04270125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
