Local law enforcement has dramatically increased its cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, while other localities refuse to cooperate. Although scholars have examined how sanctuary cities may differ from other places in terms of crime rates, attitudes toward local law enforcement’s collaboration with federal immigration authorities remain understudied. We utilize original data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES) to study attitudes toward local/federal collaboration. Our results demonstrate that those who most recognize the racial advantage of Whites are significantly less likely to support collaboration between local police and federal authorities. Confirming prior work, our results also support the critical role of partisanship, nativity, and education in explaining attitudes toward sanctuary policies. Our findings have important implications for understanding attitudes toward immigration enforcement and policies.
AbrajanoMarisaHajnalZoltan L.2015. White Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
2.
AlvarezR. MichaelBedollaLisa García. 2003. “The Foundations of Latino Voter Partisanship: Evidence from the 2000 Election.” The Journal of Politics65 (1): 31–49.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation.” American Sociological Review62 (3): 465–80.
7.
BraderTedValentinoNicholas A.SuhayElizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–78.
8.
BranscombeNylaSchmittMichaelSchiffhauerKristin. 2006. “Racial Attitudes in Response to Thoughts of White Privilege.” European Journal of Social Psychology37 (2): 203–15.
BurnsPeterGimpelJames. 2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly115 (2): 201–25.
11.
CasellasJason P.WallaceSophia J.2015. “The Role of Race, Ethnicity, and Party on Attitudes Towards Descriptive Representation.” American Politics Research43 (1): 144–69.
ChavezLeo R.2001. Covering Immigration: Popular Images and the Politics of the Nation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
14.
ChavezLeo R.2013. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press.
15.
CitrinJackGreenDonald P.MusteChristopherWongCara. 1997. “Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” The Journal of Politics59 (3): 858–81.
16.
CreekHeatherYoderStephen. 2012. “With a Little Help from Our Feds: Understanding State Immigration Enforcement Policy Adoption in American Federalism.” Policy Studies Journal40 (4): 674–97.
17.
CrollPaul. 2013. “Explanations for Racial Disadvantage and Racial Advantage: Beliefs About Both Sides of Inequality in America.” Ethnic and Racial Studies36 (1): 47–74.
18.
CummingsScott. 1980. “White Ethnics, Racial Prejudice, and Labor Market Segmentation.” American Journal of Sociology90:938–50.
ChristopherDeSanteSmithCandis Watts. 2017. “Fear, Institutionalized Racism, and Empathy: The Two Dimensions of Whites’ Racial Attitudes.” Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April 7.
21.
EndersAdamScottJamil. 2018. “The Increasing Racialization of American Electoral Politics, 1988–2016.” American Politics Research. Published electronically February 27. doi:10.1177/1532673X18755654.
22.
EspenshadeThomasHempsteadKatherine. 1996. “Contemporary American Attitudes Toward U.S. Immigration.” International Migration Review30 (2): 535–70.
23.
FeldmanStanleyHuddyLeony. 2005. “Racial Resentment and White Opposition to Race Conscious Programs: Principles or Prejudice?” American Journal of Political Science49 (1): 168–83.
24.
FetzerJoel S.2000. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States, France and Germany. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
25.
ForbesHugh Donald. 1997. Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
26.
GarnerSteve. 2006. “The Uses of Whiteness: What Sociologists Working on Europe Can Draw from U.S. Research on Whiteness.” Sociology40 (2): 257–75.
27.
GilensMartin. 1996. “‘Race-Coding’ and White Opposition to Welfare.” American Political Science Review90 (3): 593–604.
28.
GonzálezBenjaminCollingwoodLorenEl-KhatibStephen Omar. 2017. “The Politics of Refuge: Sanctuary Cities, Crime, and Undocumented Immigration.” Urban Affairs Review. Published electronically May 7. doi:10.1177/1078087417704974.
29.
GulasekaramPratheepanRamakrishnanS. Karthick. 2015. The New Immigration Federalism. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
30.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael. 2010. “Attitudes Toward Highly Skilled and Low Skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 61–84.
Hayes-BautistaDavid E.RodriguezGregory. 1995. “The Unintended Political Earthquake Set off by Prop. 187.” Los Angeles Times, November12, M6.
33.
HoodM. V.MorrisIrwin. 1998. “Give Us Your Tired and Poor . . . But Make Sure They Have a Green Card: The Effects of Documented and Undocumented Migrant Context on Anglo Opinion Toward Immigration.” Political Behavior20:1–15.
34.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 40–61.
35.
HuangXiLiuCathy Yang. 2018. “Welcoming Cities: Immigration Policy at the Local Government Level.” Urban Affairs Review54 (1): 3–32.
36.
HuntingtonSamuel. 2004. Who Are We?New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
KinderDonaldSandersLynn. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
38.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWhittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347–61.
LienPei-teConwayM. MargaretWongJanelle. 2004. The Politics of Asian Americans: Diversity and Community. New York: Routledge Press.
42.
LiuCathy Yang. 2013. “Latino Immigration and the Low-Skill Urban Labor Market: The Case of Atlanta.” Social Science Quarterly94 (1): 137–51.
43.
LongJames Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
44.
Lopez BunyasiTehama. 2015. “Color-Cognizance and Color-Blindness in White America.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity1 (2): 209–24.
45.
LyonsChristopher J.VelezMaría B.SantoroWayne A.2013. “Neighborhood Immigration, Violence, and City-Level Immigrant Political Opportunities.” American Sociological Review78(4): 604-32.
46.
Macías RojasPatrisia. 2016. From Deportation to Prison: The Politics of Immigration Enforcement in the Post-Civil Rights America. New York: New York Univ. Press.
MasuokaNatalieJunnJane. 2013. The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion, and Immigration. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
49.
McClainPaulaCarterNiambiSotoVictoria DeFrancescoLyleMoniqueGrynaviskiJeffreyNunnallyShaylaScottoThomas J.KendrickJ. AlanLackeyGerald F.CottonKendra Davenport. 2006. “Racial Distancing in a Southern City: Latino Immigrants’ Views of Black Americans.” Journal of Politics68 (3): 571–84.
NevilleHelen A.AwadGermine H.BrooksJames E.FloresMichelle P.JaimieBluemel. 2013. “Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology.” American Psychologist68(6):455–66.
52.
NewmanBenjamin. 2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 374–90.
53.
NewmanBenjaminShahSonoCollingwoodLoren. 2018. “Race, Place, and Building a Base: Latino Population Growth and the Nascent Trump Campaign for President.” Public Opinion Quarterly82:122–34. doi:10.1093/poq/nfx039.
54.
NewmanBenjaminVelezYamil. 2014. “Group Size versus Change? Assessing Americans’ Perception of Local Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly67 (2): 293–303.
55.
NewtonLina. 2012. “Policy Innovation or Vertical Integration? A View of Immigration Federalism from the States.” Law & Policy34 (2): 113–37.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1996. Racial Formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
59.
PantojaAdrian D.RamirezRicardoSeguraGary M.2001. “Citizens by Choice, Voters by Necessity: Patterns in Political Mobilization by Naturalized Latinos.” Political Research Quarterly54 (4): 729–50.
ProvineDoris MarieVarsanyiMonica W.LewisPaul G.DeckerScott H.2016. Policing Immigrants: Local Law Enforcement on the Front Lines. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
64.
RamakrishnanKarthickWongTom. 2010. “Partisanship, Not Spanish: Explaining Municipal Ordinances Affecting Undocumented Immigrants.” In Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States, edited by VarsanyiMonica, 73–96. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press.
65.
RamírezRicardo. 2013. Mobilizing Opportunities: The Evolving Latino Electorate and the Future of American Politics. Charlotte: Univ. of Virginia Press.
66.
RochaRene R.EspinoRodolfo. 2009. “Racial Threat, Residential Segregation, and Policy Attitudes of Anglos.” Political Research Quarterly62 (2): 415–26.
67.
RochaRene R.KnollBenjamin R.WrinkleRobert D.2015. “Immigration Enforcement and the Redistribution of Political Trust.” The Journal of Politics77 (4): 901–13.
68.
RochaRene R.LongoriaThomasWrinkleRobert D.KnollBenjamin R.PolinardJ. L.WenzelJames. 2011. “Ethnic Context and Immigration Policy Preferences Among Latinos and Anglos.” Social Science Quarterly92 (1): 1–19.
69.
RodríguezCristinaChishtiMuzaffarNormtanKimberly. 2010. “Legal Limits on Immigration Federalism.” In Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States, edited by Monica Varsanyi. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press
70.
SanchezGabriel R.2006. “The Role of Group Consciousness in Political Participation Among Latinos in the United States.” American Politics Research34 (4): 427–50.
71.
SchaffnerBrianMacWilliamsMatthewNtetaTatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly133 (1): 9–34.
TeslerMichael. 2016. Post-racial or Most Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
74.
TuchSteven A.HughesMichael. 2011. “Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century: The Continuing Significance of Racial Resentment.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science634 (1): 134–52.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedJardinaAshley E.2013. “The Antecedents of Immigration Opinion Among U.S. Whites: General Ethnocentrism or Media Priming of Latino Attitudes?” Political Psychology34 (2): 149–66.
77.
ValentinoNicholas A.NeunerFabianVandebroekL. Matthew. Forthcoming. “The Changing Norms of Racial Political Rhetoric and the End of Racial Priming.” Journal of Politics. Published online October 12, doi:10.1086/694845
78.
VarsanyiMonica W.2010. Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press.
79.
VarsanyiMonica W.LewisPaul G.ProvineDoris M.DeckerScott. 2012. “A Multi-layered Jurisdictional Patchwork: Immigration Federalism in the United States.” Law & Policy34 (2): 138–58.
80.
WallaceSophia J. 2014. “Papers Please: State-Level Anti-immigrant Legislation in the Wake of Arizona’s SB 1070.” Political Science Quarterly129 (2): 261–91.
81.
WaslinMichele. 2010. “Immigration Enforcement by State and Local Police: The Impact on the Enforcers and Their Communities.” In Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States, edited by VarsanyiMonica, 97–114. Redwood City, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
Zepeda-MillánChris. 2017. Latino Mass Mobilization: Immigration, Racialization, and Activism. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
