This article presents a method to assess the quality of local governance practices. The multicriteria decision analysis modeling approach is illustrated through a real application (Portuguese municipalities). To define the criteria, performance descriptors, and reference levels in each dimension of local governance, and to account for the differences in preference of scoring in each criterion, the judgments of legitimate stakeholders were considered through decision conferencing. The constructed “Municipal Governance Indicator” is calculated for the case of Lisbon to show the outputs of the model and its potential usefulness.
AndrewsMattHayRogerMyersJerrett. 2010. “Can Governance Indicators Make Sense? Towards a New Approach to Sector-Specific Measures of Governance.”Oxford Development Studies38:391–410.
2.
Bana e CostaCarlosCarneroMaría CarmenOliveiraMónica. 2012. “A Multi-criteria Model for Auditing a Predictive Maintenance Programme.”European Journal of Operational Research217:381–93.
3.
Bana e CostaCarlosOliveiraMónica. 2012. “A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Model for Faculty Evaluation.”Omega40:424–36.
4.
BouckaertGeertVan de WalleSteven. 2003. “Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators.”International Review of Administrative Sciences69:329–43.
5.
BovairdTonyLöfflerElke. 2003. “Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies.”International Review of Administrative Sciences69:313–28.
6.
da CruzNuno F.MarquesRui Cunha. 2013. “New Development: The Challenges of Designing Municipal Governance Indicators.”Public Money & Management33:209–12.
7.
da CruzNuno F.MarquesRui Cunha. 2017. “Structuring Composite Local Governance Indicators.”Policy Studies38:109–29.
8.
da CruzNuno F.TavaresAntónio F.MarquesRui CunhaJorgeSusanade SousaLuís. 2016. “Measuring Local Government Transparency.”Public Management Review18:866–93.
9.
de SousaLuís. 2008. “‘I Don’t Bribe, I Just Pull Strings’: Assessing the Fluidity of Social Representations of Corruption in Portuguese Society.”Perspectives on European Politics and Society91:8–23.
10.
de SousaLuísTavaresAntónio F.da CruzNuno F.JorgeSusana. 2015. A Reforma do Poder Local em Debate [Debating the Reform of Local Government]. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
11.
FukuyamaFrancis. 2013. “Commentary: What Is Governance?”Governance26:347–68.
HeinrichCarolyn J.LynnLaurence E.MilwardBrinton. 2010. “A State of Agents? Sharpening the Debate and Evidence over the Extent and Impact of the Transformation of Governance.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20:i3–i19.
14.
HendriksFrank. 2014. “Understanding Good Urban Governance: Essentials, Shifts, and Values.”Urban Affairs Review50:553–76.
15.
HerianMitchel N.HammJoseph A.TomkinsAlan J.ZilligLisa M. Pytlik. 2012. “Public Participation, Procedural Fairness, and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22:815–40.
16.
KaufmannDanielKraayAartMastruzziMassimo. 2011. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.”Hague Journal on the Rule of Law3:220-246.
17.
KeeneyRalph L.1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
18.
MateusRicardoFerreiraJosé AntunesCarreiraJoão. 2008. “Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): Central Porto High-Speed Railway Station.”European Journal of Operational Research187:1–18.
19.
MoraisPauloCamanhoAna. 2011. “Evaluation of Performance of European Cities with the Aim to Promote Quality of Life Improvements.”Omega39:398–409.
20.
MundaGiuseppe. 2004. “Social Multi-criteria Evaluation: Methodological Foundations and Operational Consequences.”European Journal of Operational Research158:662–77.
21.
PhillipsLawrence. 2007. “Decision Conferencing.” In Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications, edited by EdwardsWardMilesRalph F.von WinterfeldtDetlof, 375–99. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
22.
PierreJon. 2014. “Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics.”Urban Affairs Review50:864–89.
23.
SiskosEleftheriosAskounisDimitrisPsarrasJohn. 2014. “Multicriteria Decision Support for Global e-Government Evaluation.”Omega46:51–63.
24.
StewartKennedy. 2006. “Designing Good Urban Governance Indicators: The Importance of Citizen Participation and Its Evaluation in Greater Vancouver.”Cities23:196–204.
25.
TavaresAntónioCamõesPedro. 2010. “New Forms of Local Governance: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Municipal Corporations in Portugal.”Public Management Review12:587–608.
26.
UN-Habitat. 2005. Urban Governance Index: Conceptual Foundation and Field Test Report. Nairobi: Global Urban Observatory.
27.
von WinterfeldtDetlofEdwardsWard. 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioural Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
WilliamsAndrewSiddiqueAbu. 2008. “The Use (and Abuse) of Governance Indicators in Economics: A Review.”Economics of Governance9:131–75.
29.
WilsonRobCornfordJamesBainesSueMawsonJohn. 2011. “Information for Localism? Policy Sensemaking for Local Governance.”Public Money & Management31:295–300.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
